It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 6:19 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:


Yes RPB I meant the '92 team. I figured that was obvious. Nobody, including Chris Paul's family, thinks Paul was better than the '87 Magic.

We don't know if we've seen Paul's prime. It's not fair or accurate to say Stockton's was better. Like most debates here we won't know the answer for years.

And I thought it would be even more obvious that I mean Paul's prime so far

I didn't realize you were just comparing their first 8 seasons. I think Paul has been better than Stockton was at the same points in their careers.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I don't see how. He might have been a better passer. Thats really it, and its debateable. And according to Ken Stockton was hurt. I think Paul wins that one.
So you think Paul is better than everything but passing, and that's debatable? Didn't you earlier say that either answer could be right?

FavreFan wrote:
Regardless, the Dream Team didn't NEED a PG at all. They would've dominated with anyone on the team playing that role basically. But if they wanted the best one available between 2012 Paul and 1992 Stockton, Paul's the better player.
Wouldn't you say that 1992 Stockton played better in the NBA than 2012 Paul did?

Stockton had better raw numbers, I believe Paul was the better player. As I said, Paul doesn't really have any weaknesses. Stockton did. Paul has yet to play with a top 3 PF of all time also.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
2012 PG is a very different position than 1992 PG


It makes the already difficult comparison even worse


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19490
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
rogers park bryan wrote:
2012 PG is a very different position than 1992 PG


It makes the already difficult comparison even worse



I wish lance Haffner was still making his games. They are perfect for this. They are number crunchy stat driven stuff awesome. I have the Prowrestling and Baseball games. Nothing like pitting the 27 Yankees vs the 1918 white sox or Hogan at his prime vs Lou These. Great stuff. He did games for everything.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
rogers park bryan wrote:
2012 PG is a very different position than 1992 PG


It makes the already difficult comparison even worse


I'm halfway done building a working flux capacitor so we should know by 2018 or so.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:46 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80118
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Stockton had better raw numbers, I believe Paul was the better player.


That's fine if you believe that, but it's a tough argument to make. You either have to make the case that something is different now that causes lesser numbers to be better or it sounds like you're just saying one guy is better based on "a feeling". And this is where B&b always go to the silly argument that players have "evolved". Humans are exactly the same as they were thirty years ago. Today's players may take different drugs and wear different shoes and lift different weights. I constantly hear about how much bigger today's players are, and yet, the Dream Team was far bigger than this collection of players.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
JORR, isnt it paritally true in football.

Even in the last 30 years the average weight of an O lineman has gone up like 50lbs (guessing)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:00 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80118
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
rogers park bryan wrote:
JORR, isnt it paritally true in football.

Even in the last 30 years the average weight of an O lineman has gone up like 50lbs (guessing)


Yeah, but I think that speaks more to the style of the game. Certain guys that can play now couldn't play then and vice versa. Today's offensive lineman are just big, fat, and strong, like giant boulders designed specifically to protect a passer. They couldn't get out and run in front of a sweep like Jerry Kramer did. But they don't have to. That speaks more to fashion than an actual change in humans.

Players exist in their own times. I read somewhere that a guy thought Nolan Ryan couldn't have made a rotation in the 40s or 50s because striking out in that time was anathema. The hitters of that era would have walked against him far more than the guys in his own time did, as patient batters were abundant. The converse is that today Ryan might average 13 Ks a game. There's no really way of knowing if that's true, of course, but the point is you have to look at guys in the context of their own eras.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15189
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I didn't expect it to be that great but it's downright shocking how little interior defense this team actually plays. Chandler is the only guy even making an attempt and if he's out it is nonexistent.

Also, disappointing how they just settle for being a 3-point shooting team. They are an excellent shooting team, don't get me wrong, but a team that has the ability to assemble that much talent should be more balanced on the offensive end.

I think I've seen Lebron post up about 5 times in the 3 games I've watched and that has been the extent of the low-post offense. As they currently play, they are one bad shooting night away from disaster. They've avoided one already.

The 3 Point shooting, you can chalk that up to the "offense" that coach K runs. I've been a Duke fan for forever, but all they run on offense is variations on four corners, a one/four flat or isolation pick and roll.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Stockton had better raw numbers, I believe Paul was the better player.


That's fine if you believe that, but it's a tough argument to make. You either have to make the case that something is different now that causes lesser numbers to be better or it sounds like you're just saying one guy is better based on "a feeling". And this is where B&b always go to the silly argument that players have "evolved". Humans are exactly the same as they were thirty years ago. Today's players may take different drugs and wear different shoes and lift different weights. I constantly hear about how much bigger today's players are, and yet, the Dream Team was far bigger than this collection of players.

I've already made the case. You just never respond to it. And I used raw numbers for a reason. Chris Paul's PER was higher in almost every season he's played than Stockton's was in 1992. Chris Paul'a almost MVP season of 2008 pretty much kills any one season Stockton has had. And as I said, there's a significant difference between Karl Malone and David West/Blake. Also ever since Paul's ACL surgery he's paced himself for the first three quarters of games. He has said that, and it's also clear when you watch him play. The numbers all back it up too as his "advanced clutch" stats were off the charts also. It's really not a tough argument to make that Chris Paul is as good or better than Stockton. Stockton was never even the best player on his own team.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
A long time ago someone wrote this:
FavreFan wrote:
Who's righting off Stockton? Many smart basketball minds would say Paul is better. Many smart basketball minds would also say Stockton was better. Nobody's disrespecting anybody here.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30671
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
A long time ago someone wrote this:
FavreFan wrote:
Who's righting off Stockton? Many smart basketball minds would say Paul is better. Many smart basketball minds would also say Stockton was better. Nobody's disrespecting anybody here.

But, what were their G.P.A.'s?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
A long time ago someone wrote this:
FavreFan wrote:
Who's righting off Stockton? Many smart basketball minds would say Paul is better. Many smart basketball minds would also say Stockton was better. Nobody's disrespecting anybody here.

Not sure where you are going with this. Nothing I have said has been false, and nothing I have said is stating or implying that Stockton wasn't great. I just think Paul was better and responded accordingly.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
A long time ago someone wrote this:
FavreFan wrote:
Who's righting off Stockton? Many smart basketball minds would say Paul is better. Many smart basketball minds would also say Stockton was better. Nobody's disrespecting anybody here.

Not sure where you are going with this. Nothing I have said has been false, and nothing I have said is stating or implying that Stockton wasn't great. I just think Paul was better and responded accordingly.
You went from saying that to arguing that Paul is better in every way except passing, and even that is debatable.

You clearly think it's not even a discussion. Paul is far superior in your mind in pretty much every way.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nope. This is just Brick Bricking a thread again. You want me to say he's far superior because that's easier to argue against. That's your thing.

I said he's better in every area. He's a better scorer, probably by a decent margin. He's a little better at rebounding. He's a little better at defense because of the aforementioned weakness in that area. I said passing is debatable because in Paul's two best seasons his Ast% is almost on par with Stockton's best years. Paul is a better overall player, but not by a wide margin. I say this to you often but if you have a problem with what I say, argue against that, not what you wanted me to say.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:48 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80118
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
And as I said, there's a significant difference between Karl Malone and David West/Blake. Stockton was never even the best player on his own team.


And Paul wouldn't have been either had he played his whole career with Malone.

And wouldn't West have been a great player 20 years ago since the league is so superior today?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Nope. This is just Brick Bricking a thread again. You want me to say he's far superior because that's easier to argue against. That's your thing.

FavreFan wrote:
I said he's better in every area.
:lol:

You don't see my confusion here?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nope. This is just Brick Bricking a thread again. You want me to say he's far superior because that's easier to argue against. That's your thing.

FavreFan wrote:
I said he's better in every area.
:lol:

You don't see my confusion here?

You're not confused. You're just acting stupid. That second quote was in response to you saying I think he's far superior in every area, which I never said. I even spelled it out for you Sesame St style. I think Paul was slightly better in every area except passing, which I'd give a slight edge to Stockton in. Because of that I think Paul is a slightly better player. Which means I think he is a better player, but not far superior. It's close, but Paul is better.

If you're still confused now, then just quit the board.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
Interesting that "slightly better" seems to have entered the discussion.

Anyways, thanks for clarifying. There is literally nothing that Stockton did better than Paul, and Paul did everything better than Stockton except passing, but you only consider Paul to be slightly better than Stockton.

I do have one question though. If Paul is only slightly better than Stockton, why were you so confident that Paul would be the best at his position?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Slightly better entered the conversation because you felt the need to exaggerate my position and way "far superior" when all I originally said was better.

I feel Chris Paul is the better option because slightly better is still better. This isn't tough stuff to grasp OR.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group