Seacrest wrote:
I absolutely addressed it.
There was no case. Despite your pitiful and despicable insinuation that there was.
I'm 100% certain that Holder would have brought a case had there been one.
So to summarize your post, you are happy that a prosecutor who didn't go after a cop who was innocent, lost re-election in a state and city you have nothing more than a passing interest in.
You do realize that the standard in a federal civil rights prosecution is higher than it would have been for the charges McCulloch "attempted" to bring? And that there are multiple other reasons beyond the strict merits of the case that could have precluded Holder from taking further action, right? And that using the non-occurrence of federal civil rights case alone to conclude there was no case flat out at the state level doesn't logically follow, right?
To summarize your position, you are happy to let a prosecutor completely abdicate his responsibilities just because the accused happens to be a cop and believe that a separate federal charge not being brought simply proves he was right and justified all along to play defense attorney at the grand jury?