tommy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Semantics but its not that he doesnt have a job. It's that they think he's being treated unfairly in his current situation.
The only major takeaway is that he may simply not want an NFL job since he already turned down a job that would pay much more than he should have expected on the open market with a qb situation that was bad enough he had a good chance of playing.
Wait--was it confirmed that he turned down a contract a few weeks ago? I thought I heard some people say that did not happen. Then some people said he did. Never sure what the real story was.
He needs to get rid of that woman of his.
There was a report that he was from an unreliable source. There was another that him and Seattle were "apart on money" which the Kaep side denied and the reporter supposedly took back but no one posted the link of the reporter taking it back. The reporter was an NFL network reporter.
This all hinges on the
Pete Carroll comment. Do we really believe they worked him out and
said he was TOO GOOD to be their backup? That's honestly less believable than anything else in this story.
This is a sticking point for me. Have we ever heard a coach say no thanks you are too good and I can get you for an absolute financial steal. No thanks.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
