chaspoppcap wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This thread title is apt given the latest content.
I actually addressed that too. They addressed me. If anyone cares to address content rather than poster they'd see that. Never Trumpers can never seem to do that though. Never ever ever. He dummied down the process. Hillary Clinton's "scandals" didn't. study any campaign and you will find that. Doesn't make it right but it's not all that appalling either.
Dude Trump is terrible. Should not be on the ballot, neither should HRC period. IF a picture of Gary Hart with a girl on his lap killed his presidential hopes then the shit that has raged around her should have done the same. If Gen Petraeus was forced to resign for giving information like he did to his GF a member of the media, then HRC should have suffered the same fate for mishandling sensitive information. For Cripes sake she had her maid print out the daily cover sheets!
The only reason any of the stuff did not bring down Clinton is because the Media does not like Trump, any other candidate and she would have been toast.
If she is such a great person/candidate and Trump is so terrible then why is the race as close as it is?
I am not against keeping Mexicans out. I am for keeping illegals out whether they are Mexican or Irish or even Polish.We have those in abundance. I have stated that before on numerous occasions.
As for the Muslim issue. We need to slow down the intake right now because of the inherent security issues, just look at the shit going down in Europe, Sweden to be exact.
I do not hide the fact I do not like the Islamic faith because of its doctrine of convert or die. Or its persecution of Christian peoples within there countries borders.They as a religion are not compatible with how we in the west carry ourselves, read the Quran if you do not believe me.
But the problem with people that generalize about Trump being terrible is that they never specify why. You just provided a critique for why Hillary wouldn't be good. There is validity there too. I could see why there would be pause.
There is never that sort of precision with Trump. People with exception of Chus, Leash, and Reader never say why he is terrible. There is also an incessant need to loop her in with the things that he does which leads me to think there is more support than people are willing to admit.
If he is your guy say it as opposed to bashing the guy that supports the other person.
There have been more people on here willing to say they support Johnson (safe space) than willing to admit they support Trump. Do you really think that is the case? Not against the law but it is disingenuous to state both are terrible while only ever bashing one of them. Credibility is the key.
_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.