long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Also of note is the difference between the average NFL in-season game and the NFL Draft, 14.9 million and 11 million, respectively. If an off-season NFL event can draw 74% of the eyes that show up for a regular season game, it is likely that off-season talk is more compelling than my conservative 40% figure.
What's more, in 2017 the NFL's strictly national windows (SNF, MNF, TNF) averaged 13.3 million viewers. Now we're looking at the draft drawing 84% of the amount of viewers who show up for national broadcasts. The numbers available really do point to the average NFL fan being very interested in national-level NFL media, regardless of season state. Incorporating even a 70% figure for X in the above calculations results in a tentative Fan Interest Index for the NFL of 2.688, almost double that of the NBA's in-season FII. Even if we assume every NBA fan is interested in consumption of media about the NBA on a national scale (Y=1), a 70% NFL off-season fan interest rate still results in a FII 32% larger than the NBA's.
That is why Chicago sports talk radio talks about Odell Beckham in March over a Jazz-Thunder game the previous night.
This might be one of the dumbest arguments that you have ever attempted to make and that says a lot provided the particular subject. You really aren't particularly bright are you?
You had one incredibly weak retort ("use the average draw of the draft instead of total draw for.....no reason") and now you just have personal attacks and vitriol, despite the tone of the post you quoted being completely neutral.
Do you have anger issues?
Do you actually have common sense? The reason for not using the total draw is because the total draw (you may not have noticed) stretched out over three days. No matter the metric you use you lose.
No, the 11.2 million figure is the average amount of people watching over the life of the broadcast of Round 1, which is approximately a three hour event, just like an NFL game. It is perfectly acceptable to use the average amount of viewers for that day. Just because you don't like the result doesn't change that.
Quote:
You have no problem talking about a "meaningless regular season game between Milwaukee and Utah" whenever it floats your boat but for some reason you take issue with talking about days 2 and 3 of the draft. Is there any doubt as to whether we'd be arguing this if the numbers were actually in your favor?
Because you disingenuously want to incorporate them into an average instead of a total, knowing full-well that the lower numbers will drag down the average. What you may not be able to comprehend, though, is that averaging the viewership across all three days of the draft is pointless masturbation. It tells us nothing of use. The fact is, an average of 11.2 million people were interested in an off-season NFL event. Deal with it.
Quote:
First day of the draft 11 million viewers over 6 channels
Second Day 2 Million over 6 channels
Third Day 2 million over 6 channels.
11.2, 2.9 and 2.9 million, but yeah, keep showcasing just how disingenuous you will be. You'll notice in my bar napkin math I always rounded up.
Quote:
a Meaningless game between "Utah and Milwaukee" probably will outdraw days 2 and 3.
Funny you should say that, because a Cavs-Raptors match up in January of this year drew 1.8 million viewers on TNT, and that night across three national networks the NBA slate of games nabbed a total of 2.13 million viewers.
http://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2018/01 ... s-raptors/Is 2.9 million larger or smaller than 2.13 million?
Quote:
People actually care about the NBA more during NFL off Season. Get over it.
You literally have no evidence to show this, and I have shown you a metric shit ton of it.
Quote:
The NBA has about 10 inseason events that outdraw the highest rated event (first day of the NFL draft) during its season and post season. Again get over it.
......do you think the draft is the highest-rated in- or post-season event for the NFL?