Shakes!

JORR · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:10 am

good dolphin wrote:

badrogue17 wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

Wow, this is crazy

So who is the person that tweeted "you can find him posting as Shakes here"?

Cause, ya, Id vote for "dont invite Twitter mobs to this board for any reason."

Hoffy

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

I'd pay good money to see Graham and DiCaro go at it with Juggs. :alien:

Brick · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:13 am

good dolphin wrote:

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Come on. Let's not turn this around to make Hoffy the bad guy here.

rogers park bryan · **Joined:** Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm **Posts:** 81625

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Come on. Let's not turn this around to make Hoffy the bad guy here.

Not a bad guy. I think its something he may want to consider going forward though.

good dolphin · **Joined:** Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm **Posts:** 82818

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Come on. Let's not turn this around to make Hoffy the bad guy here.

separate and indepdendent acts

He's not a bad guy but is there any of us here who could withstand the scrutiny of a person on a mission to be offended?

No reason to tattle to the teacher in this instance.

JORR · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:38 am

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Come on. Let's not turn this around to make Hoffy the bad guy here.

shakes certainly isn't the bad guy here. Granted, his style may not have gone over so well on Twitter where people don't know him, but he hardly said anything outrageous. Tim Graham and Julie DiCaro have been going so hard at Kane right from the beginning that they simply can't back off even though it should be obvious that the accuser is a liar. But they- and others- are still trying to punish Kane. Can you imagine what these people would be saying if Kane had faked evidence? In fact, they were sure it was Kane who had! This case is as dead as a doornail. All shakes said is that those people who came at Kane with guns ablazing without knowing any actual facts are deserving of whatever backlash they're getting on social media. But these masters of spin even spun that into shakes celebrating death threats (which DiCaro has admitted don't actually exist).

leashyourkids · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:40 am

good dolphin wrote:

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Come on. Let's not turn this around to make Hoffy the bad guy here.

separate and indepdendent acts

He's not a bad guy but is there any of us here who could withstand the scrutiny of a person on a mission to be offended?

No reason to tattle to the teacher in this instance.

Right, but the subject of the thread was Shakes, who is clearly a douche.

JORR · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:42 am

leashyourkids wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Come on. Let's not turn this around to make Hoffy the bad guy here.

separate and indepdendent acts

He's not a bad guy but is there any of us here who could withstand the scrutiny of a person on a mission to be offended?

No reason to tattle to the teacher in this instance.

Right, but the subject of the thread was Shakes, who is clearly a douche.

True, but not because of anything he said during his ten minute foray onto Twitter.

Crystal Lake Hoffy · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:50 am

good dolphin wrote:

badrogue17 wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

Wow, this is crazy

So who is the person that tweeted "you can find him posting as Shakes here"?

Cause, ya, Id vote for "dont invite Twitter mobs to this board for any reason."

Hoffy

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Do you think anyone here really cares?

good dolphin · **Joined:** Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm **Posts:** 82818

Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

badrogue17 wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

Wow, this is crazy

So who is the person that tweeted "you can find him posting as Shakes here"?

Cause, ya, Id vote for "dont invite Twitter mobs to this board for any reason."

Hoffy

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Do you think anyone here really cares?

about what?

leashyourkids · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:05 am

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

leashyourkids wrote:

Right, but the subject of the thread was Shakes, who is clearly a douche.

True, but not because of anything he said during his ten minute foray onto Twitter.

Yes, not a defense of the douche parade (Graham, Dicaro, Bernstein, and sycophants)... just a general comment re: shakes.

Also, probably not smart to even engage in that type of conversation on Twitter using your real name if, in fact, you have some type of personal "brand" to protect (even if that brand was handed to you by fatha.)

Brick · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:11 am

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Come on. Let's not turn this around to make Hoffy the bad guy here.

shakes certainly isn't the bad guy here. Granted, his style may not have gone over so well on Twitter where people don't know him, but he hardly said anything outrageous. Tim Graham and Julie DiCaro have been going so hard at Kane right from the beginning that they simply can't back off even though it should be obvious that the accuser is a liar. But they- and others- are still trying to punish Kane. Can you imagine what these people would be saying if Kane had faked evidence? In fact, they were sure it was Kane who had! This case is as dead as a doornail. All shakes said is that those people who came at Kane with guns ablazing without knowing any actual facts are deserving of whatever backlash they're getting on social media. But these masters of spin even spun that into shakes celebrating death threats (which DiCaro has admitted don't actually exist).

Well, he deleted his account so obviously he thought that something he said wasn't good or right.

I'm on record as some of the things being said to DiCaro are out of line, even with the fact that she has been wrong and has used this as a way to try and advance her career too. I'm guessing if most of us heard a relative or significant other being called those names we would feel the same way. She deserves to be called out for doing things wrong but the problem is people like shakes do it in a way that makes them look just as bad or worse.

Hawg Ass · **Joined:** Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm **Posts:** 30690

leashyourkids wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Come on. Let's not turn this around to make Hoffy the bad guy here.

separate and indepdendent acts

He's not a bad guy but is there any of us here who could withstand the scrutiny of a person on a mission to be offended?

No reason to tattle to the teacher in this instance.

Right, but the subject of the thread was Shakes, who is clearly a douche.

Shakes is a good dude.

JORR · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:40 am

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Did he really?

Hoffy, should the social justice warriors come here and not agree with one of your viewpoints, do you expect to be defended by board members?

Come on. Let's not turn this around to make Hoffy the bad guy here.

shakes certainly isn't the bad guy here. Granted, his style may not have gone over so well on Twitter where people don't know him, but he hardly said anything outrageous. Tim Graham and Julie DiCaro have been going so hard at Kane right from the beginning that they simply can't back off even though it should be obvious that the accuser is a liar. But they- and others- are still trying to punish Kane. Can you imagine what these people would be saying if Kane had faked evidence? In fact, they were sure it was Kane who had! This case is as dead as a doornail. All shakes said is that those people who came at Kane with guns ablazing without knowing any actual facts are deserving of whatever backlash they're getting on social media. But these masters of spin even spun that into shakes celebrating death threats (which DiCaro has admitted don't actually exist).

Well, he deleted his account so obviously he thought that something he said wasn't good or right.

I'm on record as some of the things being said to DiCaro are out of line, even with the fact that she has been wrong and has used this as a way to try and advance her career too. I'm guessing if most of us heard a relative or significant other being called those names we would feel the same way. She deserves to be called out for doing things wrong but the problem is people like shakes do it in a way that makes them look just as bad or worse.

But shakes didn't say anything the slightest bit offensive about DiCaro, or if he did, I missed it. And I think that would have been difficult with all Graham's sycophants sreencapping shakes' tweets for posterity.

We're talking about people who don't care about the facts. They believe Kane is guilty merely by virtue of being a man accused by a woman and if you disagree you're guilty too.

sjboyd0137 · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:42 am

Wait...Dicaro admitted the death threats weren't real?

JORR · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:42 am

G.O.P. wrote:

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

the problem is people like shakes do it in a way that makes them look just as bad or worse.

Very true. The same message could have been conveyed using smarter and/or more artful language, and with less liability attached.

I admire shakes for standing behind his thoughts with his real name. He's a lot more credible than a Lou Brown parody account. And what exactly did he tweet that you think could have been conveyed better?

Terry's Peeps · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:45 am

sjboyd0137 wrote:

Wait...Dicaro admitted the death threats weren't real?

Yes.

Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro Sep 25
Guys, I never said I received death threats. Just a threatening tweet that referenced my daily routine. NO DEATH THREATS.

Also supposedly remembers shakes.

Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro Sep 25
I remember @shakes from law school bc on the way out of his last exam he threw all his text books in the trash.HUGE noise during exam

Brick · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:45 am

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

But shakes didn't say anything the slightest bit offensive about DiCaro, or if he did, I missed it. And I think that would have been difficult with all Graham's sycophants sreencapping shakes' tweets for posterity.

Well, he certainly did on here, but shakes deleted his account pretty quickly on twitter.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

We're talking about people who don't care about the facts. They believe Kane is guilty merely by virtue of being a man accused by a woman and if you disagree you're guilty too.

DiCaro was getting a lot of hate on twitter including some pretty horrible names, and shakes said she deserved all of it, and on here he was calling her those same names.

sjboyd0137 · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:48 am

Terry's Peeps wrote:

sjboyd0137 wrote:

Wait...Dicaro admitted the death threats weren't real?

Yes.

Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro Sep 25
Guys, I never said I received death threats. Just a threatening tweet that referenced my daily routine. NO DEATH THREATS.

Also supposedly remembers shakes.

Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro Sep 25
I remember @shakes from law school bc on the way out of his last exam he threw all his text books in the trash.HUGE noise during exam

She only remember shakes because of the crush she had on him on Love Cruise.

The death threat thing is interesting...if it is true that she never said she got them, I wonder who made those up...

Tall Midget · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:52 am

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I admire shakes for standing behind his thoughts with his real name.

Doesn't the fact that shakes deleted his twitter account indicate that he's not standing by his thoughts with his real name?

I actually like shakes and the douche character he plays on the CSFMB, but I think even he admits that his foray into twitter was ill-conceived.

Chus · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:54 am

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro Sep 25
I remember @shakes from law school bc on the way out of his last exam he threw all his text books in the trash.HUGE noise during exam

Classic Shakes.

JORR · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:54 am

Tall Midget wrote:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I admire shakes for standing behind his thoughts with his real name.

Doesn't the fact that shakes deleted his twitter account indicate that he's not standing by his thoughts with his real name?

I actually like shakes and the douche character he plays on the CSFMB, but I think even he admits that his foray into twitter was ill-conceived.

I just figured he was overwhelmed by the micromob, saw them linking his professional info, and figured, this isn't too good.

I don't remember him saying anything nasty about DiCaro. I think he may have called the accuser a "lying whore". I know he called Rick a "cuntbag". :lol:

Brick · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:56 am

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Tall Midget wrote:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I admire shakes for standing behind his thoughts with his real name.

Doesn't the fact that shakes deleted his twitter account indicate that he's not standing by his thoughts with his real name?

I actually like shakes and the douche character he plays on the CSFMB, but I think even he admits that his foray into twitter was ill-conceived.

I just figured he was overwhelmed by the micromob, saw them linking his professional info, and figured, this isn't too good.

I don't remember him saying anything nasty about DiCaro. I think he may have called the accuser a "lying whore". I know he called Rick a "cuntbag". :lol:

http://score670.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=95327&p=2318643&hilit=Caller Bob#p2318643

Hope that doesn't break any message board code.

badrogue17 · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:57 am

sjboyd0137 wrote:

Terry's Peeps wrote:

sjboyd0137 wrote:

Wait...Dicaro admitted the death threats weren't real?

Yes.

Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro Sep 25
Guys, I never said I received death threats. Just a threatening tweet that referenced my daily routine. NO DEATH THREATS.

Also supposedly remembers shakes.

Julie DiCaro ‏@JulieDiCaro Sep 25
I remember @shakes from law school bc on the way out of his last exam he threw all his text books in the trash.HUGE noise during exam

She only remember shakes because of the crush she had on him on Love Cruise.

The death threat thing is interesting...if it is true that she never said she got them, I wonder who made those up...

Sini was right on top of that in a few posts. Of course someone tweeted that possibility to her and was immediately shouted down by her SJW mob. Those same people would've also rapecultured you had you suggested pre Sept 25 that Mom fabricated evidence in an attempt to frame Kane.

rogers park bryan · **Joined:** Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm **Posts:** 81625

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

Hope that doesn't break any message board code.

Its not about code to me. I just dont want this world colliding with the real world.

Hockey Gay · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:00 am

I don't take kindly to people who break the unwritten rules of the board. Respect the board and post the right way.

Brick · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:02 am

I don't really think it will be a big deal for shakes. Being a lawyer and being a jerk is like being a lawyer and a being a person who breathes oxygen.

Crystal Lake Hoffy · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:05 am

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

I don't really think it will be a big deal for shakes. Being a lawyer and being a jerk is like being a lawyer and a being a person who breathes oxygen.

Three-quarters of this board is made up of lawyers... wait, that explains a lot.

W_Z · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:06 am

anyone who thinks they're being "threatened" on twitter is a delusional genius. especially in the media.

Kirkwood · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:11 am

i think we should focus on the main point of this thread.

shakes has been banned from multiple rec leagues.

what a jagbag.

JORR · **Posted:** Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:21 am

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Tall Midget wrote:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I admire shakes for standing behind his thoughts with his real name.

Doesn't the fact that shakes deleted his twitter account indicate that he's not standing by his thoughts with his real name?

I actually like shakes and the douche character he plays on the CSFMB, but I think even he admits that his foray into twitter was ill-conceived.

I just figured he was overwhelmed by the micromob, saw them linking his professional info, and figured, this isn't too good.

I don't remember him saying anything nasty about DiCaro. I think he may have called the accuser a "lying whore". I know he called Rick a "cuntbag". :lol:

http://score670.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=95327&p=2318643&hilit=Caller Bob#p2318643

Hope that doesn't break any message board code.

There's no denying that shakes is a crude motherfucker. But frankly, I'm more offended by him calling you a cuntbag. You're a guy I actually like. Sometimes. But see, that's the problem I have with this modern hybrid "feminism". It seems women get to decide when they are a fragile flower and when they are as strong as men. A real feminist shouldn't get too worked up over being called a Caller Bob. Me, I'm just hoping Rhonda Rousey never kicks my ass.

Shakes!

Who is online