It is currently Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:14 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82811
I want to acknowledge that she is no less than our equal on this Woman's Equality Day.

Congratulations being the equal of such luminaries!

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
I want to acknowledge that she is no less than our equal on this Woman's Equality Day.

Congratulations being the equal of such luminaries!


I thought this was last week

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93200
Location: To the left of my post
No.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65989
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Can she fix an ice machine?
No?

Equal to brick.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:59 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Darkside wrote:
Can she fix an ice machine?
No?

Equal to brick.



Except she would only be paid 79% of what BRick got for trying.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
Is it Administrative Assistant Day already?

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Can she fix an ice machine?
No?

Equal to brick.



Except she would only be paid 79% of what BRick got for trying.


Well, 98.8% when you actually correctly normalize the stats.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Congrats on being the only chick that's managed to consistently post on this board throughout the years. Especially with all these jerks and mouthbreathers.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:10 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SomeGuy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Can she fix an ice machine?
No?

Equal to brick.



Except she would only be paid 79% of what BRick got for trying.


Well, 98.8% when you actually correctly normalize the stats.


So regardless of which way you massage the numbers it will be less?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
redskingreg wrote:
Is it Administrative Assistant Day already?


:D sounds like an Archer line


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:13 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Can she fix an ice machine?
No?

Equal to brick.



Except she would only be paid 79% of what BRick got for trying.


Well, 98.8% when you actually correctly normalize the stats.


So regardless of which way you massage the numbers it will be less?


No.

http://time.com/3222543/wage-pay-gap-my ... ign=buffer

"No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.

Wage gap activists say women with identical backgrounds and jobs as men still earn less. But they always fail to take into account critical variables. Activist groups like the National Organization for Women have a fallback position: that women’s education and career choices are not truly free—they are driven by powerful sexist stereotypes. In this view, women’s tendency to retreat from the workplace to raise children or to enter fields like early childhood education and psychology, rather than better paying professions like petroleum engineering, is evidence of continued social coercion. Here is the problem: American women are among the best informed and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot."

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11253
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
redskingreg wrote:
Is it Administrative Assistant Day already?


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:28 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Can she fix an ice machine?
No?

Equal to brick.



Except she would only be paid 79% of what BRick got for trying.


Well, 98.8% when you actually correctly normalize the stats.


So regardless of which way you massage the numbers it will be less?


No.

http://time.com/3222543/wage-pay-gap-my ... ign=buffer

"No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.

Wage gap activists say women with identical backgrounds and jobs as men still earn less. But they always fail to take into account critical variables. Activist groups like the National Organization for Women have a fallback position: that women’s education and career choices are not truly free—they are driven by powerful sexist stereotypes. In this view, women’s tendency to retreat from the workplace to raise children or to enter fields like early childhood education and psychology, rather than better paying professions like petroleum engineering, is evidence of continued social coercion. Here is the problem: American women are among the best informed and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot."


You realize that still says they earn less even when other things are factored in?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Can she fix an ice machine?
No?

Equal to brick.



Except she would only be paid 79% of what BRick got for trying.


Well, 98.8% when you actually correctly normalize the stats.


So regardless of which way you massage the numbers it will be less?


No.

http://time.com/3222543/wage-pay-gap-my ... ign=buffer

"No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.

Wage gap activists say women with identical backgrounds and jobs as men still earn less. But they always fail to take into account critical variables. Activist groups like the National Organization for Women have a fallback position: that women’s education and career choices are not truly free—they are driven by powerful sexist stereotypes. In this view, women’s tendency to retreat from the workplace to raise children or to enter fields like early childhood education and psychology, rather than better paying professions like petroleum engineering, is evidence of continued social coercion. Here is the problem: American women are among the best informed and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot."


You realize that still says they earn less even when other things are factored in?


Not when the comparison is apples to apples. Don't you support a woman's right to choose her profession?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:07 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38597
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Congrats Spaulding.

For choosing a career as a mother and homemaker and putting your children before yourself.

And also for choosing to be part of the economy that is unpaid because what you have chosen is priceless.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32117
pizza_Place: Milano's
Seacrest wrote:
Congrats Spaulding.

For choosing a career as a mother and homemaker and putting your children before yourself.

And also for choosing to be part of the economy that is unpaid because what you have chosen is priceless.


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Adam Carolla's not exactly the best authority to cite on these topics; but he points out regularly that if women really made 72 cents on the dollar for the same work as men, business owners would be daft to hire men. Simply staff your firm with women and pocket the difference as profit.


Last edited by Hussra on Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Seacrest wrote:
Congrats Spaulding.

For choosing a career as a mother and homemaker and putting your children before yourself.

And also for choosing to be part of the economy that is unpaid because what you have chosen is priceless.


:puker:

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Seacrest wrote:
Congrats Spaulding.

For choosing a career as a mother and homemaker and putting your children before yourself.

And also for choosing to be part of the economy that is unpaid because what you have chosen is priceless.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Image

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:35 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Can she fix an ice machine?
No?

Equal to brick.



Except she would only be paid 79% of what BRick got for trying.


Well, 98.8% when you actually correctly normalize the stats.


So regardless of which way you massage the numbers it will be less?


No.

http://time.com/3222543/wage-pay-gap-my ... ign=buffer

"No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.

Wage gap activists say women with identical backgrounds and jobs as men still earn less. But they always fail to take into account critical variables. Activist groups like the National Organization for Women have a fallback position: that women’s education and career choices are not truly free—they are driven by powerful sexist stereotypes. In this view, women’s tendency to retreat from the workplace to raise children or to enter fields like early childhood education and psychology, rather than better paying professions like petroleum engineering, is evidence of continued social coercion. Here is the problem: American women are among the best informed and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot."


You realize that still says they earn less even when other things are factored in?


Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Not when the comparison is apples to apples. Don't you support a woman's right to choose her profession?


"It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing."

This is what you posted. It literally says there is a gap.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Image

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:42 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
"It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing."

This is what you posted. It literally says there is a gap.


Yeah, and who knows what might account for said statistically insignificant "gap"? Would you feel better if women made a fraction of a cent more? Because I'm sure we're headed there.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:50 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
"It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing."

This is what you posted. It literally says there is a gap.


Yeah, and who knows what might account for said statistically insignificant "gap"? Would you feel better if women made a fraction of a cent more? Because I'm sure we're headed there.


Here you go again trying to shift the debate instead of just admitting that you were wrong. How about them making the same as men? No one has argued they should make more. You've argued that there was no gap but even the article you posted acknowledges that a gap exists.

I just read that entire article and it made me sick.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
"It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing."

This is what you posted. It literally says there is a gap.


Yeah, and who knows what might account for said statistically insignificant "gap"? Would you feel better if women made a fraction of a cent more? Because I'm sure we're headed there.


Here you go again trying to shift the debate instead of just admitting that you were wrong. How about them making the same as men? No one has argued they should make more. You've argued that there was no gap but even the article you posted acknowledges that a gap exists.

I just read that entire article and it made me sick.


Sure, a 2% gap with an actual relevant, accurate and apples to apples comparison. Not the 75% lie that gets touted and shouted from the hills by all the usual idiots.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
"It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing."

This is what you posted. It literally says there is a gap.


Yeah, and who knows what might account for said statistically insignificant "gap"? Would you feel better if women made a fraction of a cent more? Because I'm sure we're headed there.


Here you go again trying to shift the debate instead of just admitting that you were wrong. How about them making the same as men? No one has argued they should make more. You've argued that there was no gap but even the article you posted acknowledges that a gap exists.

I just read that entire article and it made me sick.


I posted it. I know what it said. There could be any number of things that account for a statistically insignificant "gap" in wages between the sexes. Or do you expect that woman and men are always going to receive the exact same pay? That's kind of silly, not to mention impossible. And when women are on the plus side, which is bound to happen, you- and a million other "feminists"- won't be going around talking about a wage gap at all or you'll still be lying about 77 cents.

Also, I'm sorry that a woman having an opinion different than yours and backing it up with real facts and research "makes you sick".

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
who?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
"It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing."

This is what you posted. It literally says there is a gap.


Yeah, and who knows what might account for said statistically insignificant "gap"? Would you feel better if women made a fraction of a cent more? Because I'm sure we're headed there.


Here you go again trying to shift the debate instead of just admitting that you were wrong. How about them making the same as men? No one has argued they should make more. You've argued that there was no gap but even the article you posted acknowledges that a gap exists.

I just read that entire article and it made me sick.


I posted it. I know what it said. There could be any number of things that account for a statistically insignificant "gap" in wages between the sexes. or do you expect that woman and men are always going to receive the exact same pay? That's kind of silly, not to mention impossible. And when women are on the plus side, which is bound to happen, you- and a million other "feminists"- won't be going around talking about a wage gap at all or you'll still be lying about 77 cents.

Also, I'm sorry that a woman having an opinion different than yours and backing it up with real facts and research "makes you sick".


There is a gap between 2-23%. I know a woman wrote it and her excuse making still made me sick. This isn't 1956.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:04 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80171
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
"It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing."

This is what you posted. It literally says there is a gap.


Yeah, and who knows what might account for said statistically insignificant "gap"? Would you feel better if women made a fraction of a cent more? Because I'm sure we're headed there.


Here you go again trying to shift the debate instead of just admitting that you were wrong. How about them making the same as men? No one has argued they should make more. You've argued that there was no gap but even the article you posted acknowledges that a gap exists.

I just read that entire article and it made me sick.


I posted it. I know what it said. There could be any number of things that account for a statistically insignificant "gap" in wages between the sexes. or do you expect that woman and men are always going to receive the exact same pay? That's kind of silly, not to mention impossible. And when women are on the plus side, which is bound to happen, you- and a million other "feminists"- won't be going around talking about a wage gap at all or you'll still be lying about 77 cents.

Also, I'm sorry that a woman having an opinion different than yours and backing it up with real facts and research "makes you sick".


There is a gap between 2-23%. I know a woman wrote it and her excuse making still made me sick. This isn't 1956.


The gap isn't between 2% and 23% and even if it is, that's not the 77% that "feminists" including the next president constantly say it is. What does "it's not 1956" even mean? That in 2016 lies are okay if they push some agenda you support? Finally, Christina Hoff Sommers isn't some fire-breathing right-wing lunatic. She's a classical liberal feminist. I'm sorry you have an issue with a strong woman not named Hillary speaking her mind.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spaulding
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38597
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
"It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing."

This is what you posted. It literally says there is a gap.


Yeah, and who knows what might account for said statistically insignificant "gap"? Would you feel better if women made a fraction of a cent more? Because I'm sure we're headed there.


Here you go again trying to shift the debate instead of just admitting that you were wrong. How about them making the same as men? No one has argued they should make more. You've argued that there was no gap but even the article you posted acknowledges that a gap exists.

I just read that entire article and it made me sick.


I posted it. I know what it said. There could be any number of things that account for a statistically insignificant "gap" in wages between the sexes. or do you expect that woman and men are always going to receive the exact same pay? That's kind of silly, not to mention impossible. And when women are on the plus side, which is bound to happen, you- and a million other "feminists"- won't be going around talking about a wage gap at all or you'll still be lying about 77 cents.

Also, I'm sorry that a woman having an opinion different than yours and backing it up with real facts and research "makes you sick".


There is a gap between 2-23%. I know a woman wrote it and her excuse making still made me sick. This isn't 1956.


The gap isn't between 2% and 23% and even if it is, that's not the 77% that "feminists" including the next president constantly say it is. What does "it's not 1956" even mean? That in 2016 lies are okay if they push some agenda you support? Finally, Christina Hoff Sommers isn't some fire-breathing right-wing lunatic. She's a classical liberal feminist. I'm sorry you have an issue with a strong woman not named Hillary speaking her mind.



I didn't really want to meet Friday anyway.

Let me know how this ends up.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group