Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Tony Romo
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=105861		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Seacrest [ Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Tony Romo
Replacing Phil Simms as #1 analyst on CBS.

Best play you have ever made.
Author:  Caller Bob [ Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Movie Reference...
Author:  ToxicMasculinity [ Tue Apr 04, 2017 3:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
The only better news today would have been finding out Phil Simms was killed by a swarm of bees.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
There would have been quite the media buzz over that.
Author:  Elmhurst Steve [ Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Seacrest wrote:
Replacing Phil Simms as #1 analyst on CBS.

Best play you have ever made.


Great judgment. Too many concussions already behind a great offensive line. Behind a lesser one, he would be lucky to get through the first half of a season.
Author:  newper [ Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Bernstein called it "total crap" that Romo would get on the #1 broadcast team with NO live broadcast experience.

Bonnie.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/bonnie-ber ... 39790.html
Author:  Peoria Matt [ Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Frank Coztansa wrote:
There would have been quite the media buzz over that.



:lol:


Very nice.
Author:  Colonel Angus [ Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
If he can speak English @ an 8th grade level, he's already better than his predecessor.
Author:  Darkside [ Wed Apr 05, 2017 2:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Colonel Angus wrote:
If he can speak English @ an 8th grade level, he's already better than his predecessor.

Even if he can't I'll take him anyway.
Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
I wonder whether Jerry Jones threw CBS a few dollars to make it happen.
Author:  pittmike [ Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I wonder whether Jerry Jones threw CBS a few dollars to make it happen.


Doesn't JJ get stuck with a big dead money cap hit.
Author:  walkrman5 [ Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
pittmike wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I wonder whether Jerry Jones threw CBS a few dollars to make it happen.


Doesn't JJ get stuck with a big dead money cap hit.


Approx...Cowboys take a 19M salary cap hit...which they might be able to spread over two years. If Romo was on roster..it would've been 24M. Also, The Cowboys "released" Romo so that he didn't have to pay back a portion of his signing bonus. Jerry took care of Romo. No surprise.
Author:  Godfella [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 7:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Tony Romo is pretty sharp figuring out and calling the next play just by looking at the offensive formation.

So, why hasn't a team offered him a job on their Defensive staff?
Author:  Brick [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 7:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Godfella wrote:
Tony Romo is pretty sharp figuring out and calling the next play just by looking at the offensive formation.

So, why hasn't a team offered him a job on their Defensive staff?

They don't want to pay him 5 million?
Author:  veganfan21 [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Part of me was impressed but then I figured that was his job for 12 years or whatever and he was pretty good at it so maybe I shouldn't be surprised. Now my question is why aren't the other QBs who do analysis as perceptive as Romo? Is it matter of history...like maybe the game was vastly different when Aikman was starting that he isn't as in the know about modern playcalling as Romo is? But knowing that stuff is his job so...idk.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 7:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Finally gets to a Super Bowl.
Author:  Darkside [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 7:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Godfella wrote:
Tony Romo is pretty sharp figuring out and calling the next play just by looking at the offensive formation.

So, why hasn't a team offered him a job on their Defensive staff?

Because he sucks.
Author:  newper [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Finally gets to a Super Bowl.

:thumleft: He's much more deserving for the announcing than the QB playing at least!!
Author:  ToxicMasculinity [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Solid dude. Solid announcer
Author:  Scooter [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
I usually have volume way low anyway so I pay no attention to whomever is announcing.
Author:  Darkside [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Solid dude. Solid announcer

Solod in the sense that hes not composed of glasses? I agree. He is made of solids.
Author:  Freelance Mortician [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 10:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Darkside wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Solid dude. Solid announcer

Solod in the sense that hes not composed of glasses? I agree. He is made of solids.


Huh? Did you forget to log in as PittMike?
Author:  Darkside [ Mon Jan 21, 2019 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
Freelance Mortician wrote:
Darkside wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Solid dude. Solid announcer

Solod in the sense that hes not composed of glasses? I agree. He is made of solids.


Huh? Did you forget to log in as PittMike?

Yes.
Author:  pittmike [ Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
:lol: Anyway Romo is great for his insight. I think he talks too much or too often though.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jan 22, 2019 9:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Tony Romo
I like how authentic he sounds. You can tell he really enjoys watching the games.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/