Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
John McCain https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=106977 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | John McCain |
For fighting off death and convincing his fellow lizards in Arizona that he still can embarrass them as their senator. And yes, he was just as bad today in his assistance of the lyin' Keebler elf. |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
He's pissed that Gifford got a warship named after her and now he is just lashing out at anybody. |
Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
KILL ME NOW, BILLY |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Did I misunderstand or was the basis for most if not all of his non-answers the contention that Trump might theoretically someday in the future decide to invoke Executive Privilege retroactively? What the hell is that shit? This is tolerated?!? |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Don Tiny wrote: Did I misunderstand or was the basis for most if not all of his non-answers the contention that Trump might theoretically someday in the future decide to invoke Executive Privilege? What the hell is that shit? This is tolerated?!? It's something that would have had him charged with contempt of Congress if the "leadership " weren't such brazenly hypocritical frauds. His bs claim is what Reed, Wydon & Kamala Harris were getting at. His claim doesn't exist in law. Angus King made him look foolish |
Author: | Brick [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Great American. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Great American. Right up until he left the Hanoi Hilton |
Author: | Brick [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Great American. Right up until he left the Hanoi Hilton I think you hate all Republicans. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Great American. Right up until he left the Hanoi Hilton I think you hate all Republicans. Racists, hypocrites, liars and perverts. In 2017 what's to like in this bunch? |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Don Tiny wrote: Did I misunderstand or was the basis for most if not all of his non-answers the contention that Trump might theoretically someday in the future decide to invoke Executive Privilege? What the hell is that shit? This is tolerated?!? It's something that would have had him charged with contempt of Congress if the "leadership " weren't such brazenly hypocritical frauds. His bs claim is what Reed, Wydon & Kamala Harris were getting at. His claim doesn't exist in law. Angus King made him look foolish Stop yourself. I expect this type of pandering from other posters. You raised not a peep when Eric Holder ignored Congressional subpoena for months. Behavior that snubbed the very laws he was sworn to protect, and behavior that you and I could never get away with. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Don Tiny wrote: Did I misunderstand or was the basis for most if not all of his non-answers the contention that Trump might theoretically someday in the future decide to invoke Executive Privilege? What the hell is that shit? This is tolerated?!? It's something that would have had him charged with contempt of Congress if the "leadership " weren't such brazenly hypocritical frauds. His bs claim is what Reed, Wydon & Kamala Harris were getting at. His claim doesn't exist in law. Angus King made him look foolish Stop yourself. I expect this type of pandering from other posters. You raised not a peep when Eric Holder ignored Congressional subpoena for months. Behavior that snubbed the very laws he was sworn to protect, and behavior that you and I could never get away with. Where have you ever seen me defend or laud Holder's performance as AG? I thought that he was just like his boss as an attorney, scared, calculated and overwhelmingly safely political. They weren't scandalous (which is rare today), but I thought only Loretta Lynch showed character |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Plus, congressional subpoenas and hearings then were nothing but limp wristed attempts at lynch mobs by today's party uber alles republicans. Now they're just limp, befitting Kim Il Trump's administration |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Don Tiny wrote: Did I misunderstand or was the basis for most if not all of his non-answers the contention that Trump might theoretically someday in the future decide to invoke Executive Privilege? What the hell is that shit? This is tolerated?!? It's something that would have had him charged with contempt of Congress if the "leadership " weren't such brazenly hypocritical frauds. His bs claim is what Reed, Wydon & Kamala Harris were getting at. His claim doesn't exist in law. Angus King made him look foolish Stop yourself. I expect this type of pandering from other posters. You raised not a peep when Eric Holder ignored Congressional subpoena for months. Behavior that snubbed the very laws he was sworn to protect, and behavior that you and I could never get away with. Where have you ever seen me defend or laud Holder's performance as AG? I thought that he was just like his boss as an attorney, scared, calculated and overwhelmingly safely political. They weren't scandalous (which is rare today), but I thought only Loretta Lynch showed character That's my point. You never condemned Holder the way you have Sessions. And Loretta Lynch has been given a free pass since meeting privately with Bill Clinton, and getting caught trying to tell Comey how to handle Hillary's investigation after she was forced to recuse herself. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Plus, congressional subpoenas and hearings were nothing but limp wristed attempts at lynch mobs by today's party uber alles republicans Try knocking on the door of Brian Terry's family and telling them that. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Don Tiny wrote: Did I misunderstand or was the basis for most if not all of his non-answers the contention that Trump might theoretically someday in the future decide to invoke Executive Privilege? What the hell is that shit? This is tolerated?!? It's something that would have had him charged with contempt of Congress if the "leadership " weren't such brazenly hypocritical frauds. His bs claim is what Reed, Wydon & Kamala Harris were getting at. His claim doesn't exist in law. Angus King made him look foolish Stop yourself. I expect this type of pandering from other posters. You raised not a peep when Eric Holder ignored Congressional subpoena for months. Behavior that snubbed the very laws he was sworn to protect, and behavior that you and I could never get away with. Where have you ever seen me defend or laud Holder's performance as AG? I thought that he was just like his boss as an attorney, scared, calculated and overwhelmingly safely political. They weren't scandalous (which is rare today), but I thought only Loretta Lynch showed character That's my point. You never condemned Holder the way you have Sessions. And Loretta Lynch has been given a free pass since meeting privately with Bill Clinton, and getting caught trying to tell Comey how to handle Hillary's investigation after she was forced to recuse herself. Please. IIRC that charge was related to the Bush policies that Obama continued, which republicans previously had no problem with, but is a convenient talking point now |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Plus, congressional subpoenas and hearings were nothing but limp wristed attempts at lynch mobs by today's party uber alles republicans Try knocking on the door of Brian Terry's family and telling them that. I respect the Sandy Hook families far more for their integrity than that family that took every attempt to wrap themselves in the flag and a faulty reading of the second amendment |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
What policies are you referring to? Lynch's activities have nothing to do with Bush. Holder's breaking the law had nothing to do with Bush policies either. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Plus, congressional subpoenas and hearings were nothing but limp wristed attempts at lynch mobs by today's party uber alles republicans Try knocking on the door of Brian Terry's family and telling them that. I respect the Sandy Hook families far more for their integrity than that family that took every attempt to wrap themselves in the flag and a faulty reading of the second amendment Brian Terry was killed in Operation Fast and Furious. Holder lied to Congress about his knowledge of it. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Seacrest wrote: What policies are you referring to? Lynch's activities have nothing to do with Bush. Holder's breaking the law had nothing to do with Bush policies either. Didn't Bush start the underlying program that he wouldn't answer to? I really don't know, like I said above I didn't really care for Holder, but Sessions is a complete liar hiding behind lawyerly arts, political friendship and a bullshit southern facade. But why won't you take your own purity test here? |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: What policies are you referring to? Lynch's activities have nothing to do with Bush. Holder's breaking the law had nothing to do with Bush policies either. Didn't Bush start the underlying program that he wouldn't answer to? I really don't know, like I said above I didn't really care for Holder, but Sessions is a complete liar hiding behind lawyerly arts, political friendship and a bullshit southern facade. But why won't you take your own purity test here? Which is? |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: What policies are you referring to? Lynch's activities have nothing to do with Bush. Holder's breaking the law had nothing to do with Bush policies either. Didn't Bush start the underlying program that he wouldn't answer to? I really don't know, like I said above I didn't really care for Holder, but Sessions is a complete liar hiding behind lawyerly arts, political friendship and a bullshit southern facade. But why won't you take your own purity test here? Holder, Ashcroft, Gonzales and Lynch. You can have all of them. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Seacrest wrote: What policies are you referring to? Lynch's activities have nothing to do with Bush. Holder's breaking the law had nothing to do with Bush policies either. I only referenced her to illustrate part of my distaste for Holder, not W I'm still waiting on you to hold a republican to the sometimey standards you post about when it suits your politics |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: What policies are you referring to? Lynch's activities have nothing to do with Bush. Holder's breaking the law had nothing to do with Bush policies either. I only referenced her to illustrate part of my distaste for Holder, not W I'm still waiting on you to hold a republican to the sometimey standards you post about when it suits your politics Seacrest wrote: Good riddance to the Bush and Clinton families.
|
Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
I've said it before, but we should've left him in Vietnam |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: What policies are you referring to? Lynch's activities have nothing to do with Bush. Holder's breaking the law had nothing to do with Bush policies either. I only referenced her to illustrate part of my distaste for Holder, not W I'm still waiting on you to hold a republican to the sometimey standards you post about when it suits your politics Seacrest wrote: Good riddance to the Bush and Clinton families. I really should've seen that one coming |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: What policies are you referring to? Lynch's activities have nothing to do with Bush. Holder's breaking the law had nothing to do with Bush policies either. I only referenced her to illustrate part of my distaste for Holder, not W I'm still waiting on you to hold a republican to the sometimey standards you post about when it suits your politics Seacrest wrote: Good riddance to the Bush and Clinton families. I really should've seen that one coming You did, because I had posted this in the past. It's time for something other than a two party system. Both sides have proven to be dishonest. And they are both happy that voters sit around pointing fingers at each other. |
Author: | Brick [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Great American. Right up until he left the Hanoi Hilton I think you hate all Republicans. Racists, hypocrites, liars and perverts. In 2017 what's to like in this bunch? The family values. |
Author: | BigW72 [ Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: John McCain |
Regular Reader wrote: Racists, hypocrites, liars and perverts. In 2017 what's to like in this bunch? Seacrest wrote: It's time for something other than a two party system. Both sides have proven to be dishonest. And they are both happy that voters sit around pointing fingers at each other. Seacrest gets it. RR...you are absolutely correct, but that vitriol should be held equally for the Democratic party. They are no different. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |