Apparently you guys don't even watch the Sox anymore.
This is great.
Hint: check their score.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| The Pirates 10 https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=107332 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Brick [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | The Pirates 10 |
The Cubs 0. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
| Apparently you guys don't even watch the Sox anymore. This is great. Hint: check their score. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leashyourkids wrote: :lol: Apparently you guys don't even watch the Sox anymore. This is great. Hint: check their score. Sox are supposed to lose this year. Today was a success for them. Opposite holds true for your team. Sorry, bud. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
FavreFan wrote: leashyourkids wrote: :lol: Apparently you guys don't even watch the Sox anymore. This is great. Hint: check their score. Sox are supposed to lose this year. Today was a success for them. Opposite holds true for your team. Sorry, bud. Were they supposed to get nearly no-hit by a rookie? |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: leashyourkids wrote: :lol: Apparently you guys don't even watch the Sox anymore. This is great. Hint: check their score. Sox are supposed to lose this year. Today was a success for them. Opposite holds true for your team. Sorry, bud. Were they supposed to get nearly no-hit by a rookie? I think so. Have you seen their lineup? |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
There's no glory in getting MANY hits versus just 1. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
FavreFan wrote: leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: leashyourkids wrote: :lol: Apparently you guys don't even watch the Sox anymore. This is great. Hint: check their score. Sox are supposed to lose this year. Today was a success for them. Opposite holds true for your team. Sorry, bud. Were they supposed to get nearly no-hit by a rookie? I think so. Have you seen their lineup? Honestly, no. I've never watched more than an inning of a Sox game in my life. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: leashyourkids wrote: :lol: Apparently you guys don't even watch the Sox anymore. This is great. Hint: check their score. Sox are supposed to lose this year. Today was a success for them. Opposite holds true for your team. Sorry, bud. Were they supposed to get nearly no-hit by a rookie? I think so. Have you seen their lineup? Honestly, no. I've never watched more than an inning of a Sox game in my life. That's a lie |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
Let's all be glad we aren't the Blue Jays. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
When I typed it, I figured I was embellishing, but the more I think about it, it's absolutely true. Maybe once or twice just to watch Sale but that's it. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Let's all be glad we aren't the Blue Jays. Quiet, pacifist. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leashyourkids wrote: When I typed it, I figured I was embellishing, but the more I think about it, it's absolutely true. Maybe once or twice just to watch Sale but that's it. 2005. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
Terry's Peeps wrote: leashyourkids wrote: When I typed it, I figured I was embellishing, but the more I think about it, it's absolutely true. Maybe once or twice just to watch Sale but that's it. 2005. Yup. Bet you did. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
Terry's Peeps wrote: leashyourkids wrote: When I typed it, I figured I was embellishing, but the more I think about it, it's absolutely true. Maybe once or twice just to watch Sale but that's it. 2005. Nope, not then either. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
I just can't even think you look like Hunter ST anymore. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
pittmike wrote: I just can't even think you look like Hunter ST anymore. Fuckin weird, isn't it? Meeting people from the board is a mindfuck. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leashyourkids wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Let's all be glad we aren't the Blue Jays. Quiet, pacifist. Fuckin' Canadian. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: The Cubs 0.
|
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leashyourkids wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: leashyourkids wrote: When I typed it, I figured I was embellishing, but the more I think about it, it's absolutely true. Maybe once or twice just to watch Sale but that's it. 2005. Nope, not then either. You should watch other teams. Helps when figuring out which shortstops are star players. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
FavreFan wrote: leashyourkids wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: leashyourkids wrote: When I typed it, I figured I was embellishing, but the more I think about it, it's absolutely true. Maybe once or twice just to watch Sale but that's it. 2005. Nope, not then either. You should watch other teams. Helps when figuring out which shortstops are star players. NBA section vibe |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leashyourkids wrote: :lol: I don't.
Apparently you guys don't even watch the Sox anymore. This is great. Hint: check their score. |
|
| Author: | formerlyknownas [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
pittmike wrote: I just can't even think you look like Hunter ST anymore. first time i saw it, i thought it was MacArthur |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leash doesnt watch Sox games. But watched Sale pitch. And presumably watches when its Sox vs Cubs. But he has never watched an inning of the Sox in his life, he says. |
|
| Author: | W_Z [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: More productive losing! http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=82312 |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
| This isn't me trying to irk Sox fans. I'm being honest. You are correct, though, flapjacks. I forgot about when they play the Cubs. But other than that, no, I couldn't even tell you any position players on the Sox other than Davidson, Abreoo, and Garcia. Oh, and I do look at Quintana's box scores occasionally out of curiosity. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
Ok. Also, in fairness, it took the Rockies 20 outs to get their 10 runs. It took the Pirates 2. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Ok. Also, in fairness, it took the Rockies 20 outs to get their 10 runs. It took the Pirates 2. Wow, I'd never thought of it that way. A philosopher-king, if ever there was one. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leashyourkids wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Ok. Also, in fairness, it took the Rockies 20 outs to get their 10 runs. It took the Pirates 2. Wow, I'd never thought of it that way. A philosopher-king, if ever there was one. Why don't you crown him then? |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
leashyourkids wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Ok. Also, in fairness, it took the Rockies 20 outs to get their 10 runs. It took the Pirates 2. Wow, I'd never thought of it that way. A philosopher-king, if ever there was one. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Sun Jul 09, 2017 9:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Pirates 10 |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Ok. Also, in fairness, it took the Rockies 20 outs to get their 10 runs. It took the Pirates 2. Yup. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|