Cutting through the party of pedophiles bullshit.

Keep positioning Hillary.

So you've read 300 pages and 10 hours of testimony in the last 12 hours? Fusion GPS didn't investigate anything about Russia and most importantly the FBI had slready been investigating based on blabbermouth Papadopoulos speaking with an Australian Diplomat.

To me the bottom line is, what are you interested in? If you're sincerely upset about foreign interference in our election, you should be concerned about Clinton/DNC paying foreign agents to gather information/opposition research.

My girls Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Kellyanne both tip their cap. Even they are impressed with this spin.

I read it this morning. It's not that difficult. Here it is if you're really interested:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... cript.html

Like I said, most of it is boring. His lawyer makes a lot of what I consider questionable suggestions regarding "privilege", but we have a lot of lawyers here who are more qualified to discuss that than I am.

To me the bottom line is, what are you interested in? If you're sincerely upset about foreign interference in our election, you should be concerned about Clinton/DNC paying foreign agents to gather information/opposition research.

I don't see how that's spin. It's a fact, isn't it?

Here's the Washington Post, not exactly a pro-Trump paper:

"...the dossier's author, Steele, wasn't brought into the mix until after Democrats retained Fusion GPS. So while both sides paid Fusion GPS, Steele was only funded by Democrats."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... bfb474c328

Who is defending the indefensible here? I'm certainly not defending Donald Trump. If he actually colluded with agents of a foreign government to influence the election, he should be impeached immediately and then we should go from there regarding further punishment. But so far the only entity we know actually paid foreign agents to influence the election is not Donald Trump. Explain how I have that wrong.

So you've read the entire thing? You've read that Steele was hired by Hillary? After reading the entire thing in record time your conclusion is "But Hillary" and "If Republicans had done.."? It's REALLY amazing that a guy who is dismissive of the actions of Flynn and others hasn't found a crime that he doesn't believe Hillary committed and then claim to be the ONLY person capable of being objective. That's impressive.

From my understanding, Fusion GPS is an investigative firm owned by a former Wall Street Journal reporter (Ameriican!). The Fusion GPS firm hired Christopher Steele, a former British (Huge Ally!), to carry out the opposition research.

Are you really saying it's okay to collude with foreigners to influence elections as long as their countries are "allies", whatever that means? And where did Steele get his information? Did he pay anyone? These are real questions.

Talk about spin. You really can't make this shit up!

Yeah, I mean there's a lot that you can skip over. The first twenty pages is just introductions and instructions.

And no, I didn't read that Steele was hired by Hillary or by anyone else. That's a question he refused to answer.

Also, I've never dismissed the actions of Flynn, but I haven't seen anything that suggests he "colluded" with Russia to influence the election.

I've also never said that I'm the ONLY person capable of being objective, but I am one of the few here who isn't a hard political partisan one way or the other. I think the fact that you've lost sight of the entire point of the investigation(s) and just so obviously want anything to come out that will destroy the Trump presidency speaks to your lack of objectivity. Tell the truth. You'd love to be able to say, "Well there was no Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, but Trump and Kushner laundered money through Deutsche Bank so he should be impeached." I'm pretty sure it was you who posted that phony story about Mueller going after Trump's bank accounts, wasn't it?

He won't answer, but I'd still like to know when the Washington Free Beacon became a liberal/Dem publication.

The question that no trumpet will ever address

Did I miss a post here? Who cited the Free Beacon?

But part of JORR's point is that the Russian aspect of the Fusion GPS investigation only began after it became a DNC-funded initiative. The Free Beacon had no connection to the hiring of Steele.

I'm not sure what you're saying here. It is a fact that the Free Beacon has no direct connection to the Steele dossier. This point was first revealed in David Corn's original reporting about the dossier's existence and has been further developed by other news organizations.

The owner of the Free Beacon was the one who originally financed it. How is that not a direct connection.