In a case about electioneering vs. free speech questioning the lawyer on the electioneering side or the arguement. Talk about setting someone up for the kill.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Justice Samuel Alito https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=111081 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Franky T [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Justice Samuel Alito |
In a case about electioneering vs. free speech questioning the lawyer on the electioneering side or the arguement. Talk about setting someone up for the kill.
|
|
| Author: | JORR [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Speech is freely available to hermits. Otherwise, not so much. |
|
| Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
He took him behind the woodshed |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
That lawyer sucks. SPIT IT OUT, YOU PUSSY! |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example. Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under. |
|
| Author: | JORR [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place. It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government. The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"? |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Seacrest wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example. Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under. What was mentioned was this case being an example of free speech being under assault. Try and keep up. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place. It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government. The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"? Maybe. If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Seacrest wrote: Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example. Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under. This literally has nothing to do with the case being argued to the Supreme Court. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Douchebag wrote: Seacrest wrote: Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example. Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under. This literally has nothing to do with the case being argued to the Supreme Court. As well as being totally made up. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Seacrest wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example. Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under. What was mentioned was this case being an example of free speech being under assault. Try and keep up. If the lawyer arguing the case won't affirm that wearing a 1st amendment t-shirt isn't political, then, yes, it's under assault there as well. |
|
| Author: | JORR [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place. It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government. The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"? Maybe. If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue. The 11th Ward guys will need a discount from Men's Wearhouse. They usually vote in their McCormick Place work clothes. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Douchebag wrote: Seacrest wrote: Speakers who have differing views are not allowed to speak on college campuses. And that is one small example. Happy to see you were able to get an internet signal under whatever rock you are currently residing under. This literally has nothing to do with the case being argued to the Supreme Court. Seacrest wrote: Let's say it does.
|
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place. It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government. The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"? Maybe. If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue. The 11th Ward guys will need a discount from Men's Wearhouse. They usually vote in their McCormick Place work clothes. 
|
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place. It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government. The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"? Maybe. If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue. The 11th Ward guys will need a discount from Men's Wearhouse. They usually vote in their McCormick Place work clothes. $84 to have an 11th Ward "electrician" plug in your sound equipment back in the day. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Seacrest wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: This case is before the Supreme Court but free speech isn't under assault. It isn't. It's an extreme version of the law against handing out campaign materials within 100 feet of a polling place. I think it is as illustrated by the lawyer making the argument that the political speech he agrees with is okay to wear on a t-shirt at a polling place. It's not dissimilar to Youtube and Twitter deciding what is "fake" and purging the right-wing views and leaving the left, except those are private companies and this is the government. The enforcement would clearly be arbitrary and who gets to decide? What if a deep red county allowed in guys in Armalite t-shirts but kicked out a girl wearing a shirt that said "I can't breathe"? Maybe. If everyone had to wear a sport coat to vote, this wouldn't be an issue. The 11th Ward guys will need a discount from Men's Wearhouse. They usually vote in their McCormick Place work clothes. $84 to have an 11th Ward "electrician" plug in your sound equipment back in the day. Worth every penny. |
|
| Author: | Passepartout [ Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Because the reason it is not cool to hand out campaign materials 100 feet is to influence a vote or to probably have bribery avoiding. |
|
| Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
 What is this? You're going to wear the shirt of the candidate you're going to vote for? Don't be that guy. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Sat Mar 03, 2018 6:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Hatchetman wrote: Speech is freely available to hermits. Well, I've got that goin' for me, which is nice. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sat Mar 03, 2018 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Justice Samuel Alito |
Hatchetman wrote: Speech is freely available to hermits. Otherwise, not so much. This guy gets it. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|