It is currently Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:22 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Ardent capitalists will not like this proposal one bit.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/17/ch ... ogram.html

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Ardent capitalists will not like this proposal one bit.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/17/ch ... ogram.html


As noted they are starting this in Stockton, CA. I don't know how Chicago would finance this. It's certainly the way we are headed though.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 8:16 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80131
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtpgkX588nM

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ardent capitalists will not like this proposal one bit.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/17/ch ... ogram.html


As noted they are starting this in Stockton, CA. I don't know how Chicago would finance this. It's certainly the way we are headed though.


I hear people like you and Brick mention this but never really see any serious movement in an actual government. Does not matter either way really but I think we will see a huge resistance to this from the people just above whatever cut off line would differentiate between the working and non working.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15048
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
Ardent capitalists will not like this proposal one bit.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/17/ch ... ogram.html


Funny shit. A pilot program is also going on in Sacramento also. Free money? NOTHING IS FREE!!!!!!

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56488
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
pittmike wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ardent capitalists will not like this proposal one bit.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/17/ch ... ogram.html


As noted they are starting this in Stockton, CA. I don't know how Chicago would finance this. It's certainly the way we are headed though.


I hear people like you and Brick mention this but never really see any serious movement in an actual government. Does not matter either way really but I think we will see a huge resistance to this from the people just above whatever cut off line would differentiate between the working and non working.

I have no idea how universal basic income will work on anything less than a federal level, but Ruffcorn is right that we are heading toward it. There's just not gonna be enough work to do.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ardent capitalists will not like this proposal one bit.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/17/ch ... ogram.html


As noted they are starting this in Stockton, CA. I don't know how Chicago would finance this. It's certainly the way we are headed though.


I hear people like you and Brick mention this but never really see any serious movement in an actual government. Does not matter either way really but I think we will see a huge resistance to this from the people just above whatever cut off line would differentiate between the working and non working.

I have no idea how universal basic income will work on anything less than a federal level, but Ruffcorn is right that we are heading toward it. There's just not gonna be enough work to do.


We have already reached a point where a significant amount of the work being done should be automated or at mostly computerized. I would say insurance claims are something that a computer could likely do. And anytime someone's job is to move things on spreadsheets, it's likely they should be doing it in a different way.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ardent capitalists will not like this proposal one bit.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/17/ch ... ogram.html


As noted they are starting this in Stockton, CA. I don't know how Chicago would finance this. It's certainly the way we are headed though.


I hear people like you and Brick mention this but never really see any serious movement in an actual government. Does not matter either way really but I think we will see a huge resistance to this from the people just above whatever cut off line would differentiate between the working and non working.

I have no idea how universal basic income will work on anything less than a federal level, but Ruffcorn is right that we are heading toward it. There's just not gonna be enough work to do.


We have already reached a point where a significant amount of the work being done should be automated or at mostly computerized. I would say insurance claims are something that a computer could likely do. And anytime someone's job is to move things on spreadsheets, it's likely they should be doing it in a different way.

People will go crazy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33208
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
CH is correct. It has to be at the Federal level, and it must be a more robust benefit. If you do it only in Chicago, you will have people moving in to gain the benefit and drive up housing costs. The people taxed to cover it will move out.

Immigration will cause problems on a national scale because it would cause even more pressure for people to come to the U.S.

It is an interesting concept. Just makes sure there is revenue to support it.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
tommy wrote:
People will go crazy


This is all I am saying. Not that it is right or wrong or that is should or should not happen. I can't see how it will actually come about and how people with go for it.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
denisdman wrote:
CH is correct. It has to be at the Federal level, and it must be a more robust benefit. If you do it only in Chicago, you will have people moving in to gain the benefit and drive up housing costs. The people taxed to cover it will move out.

Immigration will cause problems on a national scale because it would cause even more pressure for people to come to the U.S.

It is an interesting concept. [b]Just makes sure there is revenue to support it.[/b]


It really does not matter. At some point whether it is a Robin Hood action, just printing pretend money or flat out socialism there will be a sizable faction of the population unhappy.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56488
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
We have already reached a point where a significant amount of the work being done should be automated or at mostly computerized. I would say insurance claims are something that a computer could likely do. And anytime someone's job is to move things on spreadsheets, it's likely they should be doing it in a different way.


One of the liberal arguments against M4A has been that it will put cubicle jockeys out of work, and because many of them are women, wanting Medicare for all means you hate all women and want them to lose their jobs. Great. But yeah, if we're going to automate semitrucks, we should be able to automate Microsoft Excel drones. I'd even say we should do that first.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19490
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
When I was flying in for my brothers funeral. I was listening to this guy talk about something like it.
In stead of an income tax there is a universal federal sales tax. Then everyone gets an equal payment. You want more you work. The only way it could work is if we fixed immigration and the prison system.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Curious Hair wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
We have already reached a point where a significant amount of the work being done should be automated or at mostly computerized. I would say insurance claims are something that a computer could likely do. And anytime someone's job is to move things on spreadsheets, it's likely they should be doing it in a different way.


One of the liberal arguments against M4A.


It's a fine audio format, and fukk ewe if you don't like it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
chaspoppcap wrote:
When I was flying in for my brothers funeral. I was listening to this guy talk about something like it.
In stead of an income tax there is a universal federal sales tax. Then everyone gets an equal payment. You want more you work. The only way it could work is if we fixed immigration and the prison system.


The concept has very little to do with immigration or prison. And those fixes are also a completely separate discussion.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10244
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
I'm fine with UBA if the money for it comes out of other more inefficient benefits programs which for those people would qualify. Let the people get a little more money by removing the inefficiency.

Now if he's going to fund it by just taxing every employer 1% of gross salaries, then he's fucked in the head.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40822
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
When I was flying in for my brothers funeral. I was listening to this guy talk about something like it.
In stead of an income tax there is a universal federal sales tax. Then everyone gets an equal payment. You want more you work. The only way it could work is if we fixed immigration and the prison system.


The concept has very little to do with immigration or prison. And those fixes are also a completely separate discussion.



Unless the thinking is that prisoners get the benefit as well as immigrants legal or otherwise. There can be discussion in those areas regarding this.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56488
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I'm fine with UBA if the money for it comes out of other more inefficient benefits programs which for those people would qualify. Let the people get a little more money by removing the inefficiency.


https://newrepublic.com/article/143758/ ... -wrong-ubi

Quote:
But Zuckerberg reveals exactly why the left should be alarmed that Silicon Valley is taking the lead on this issue.

First, the idea that UBI has bipartisan appeal is disingenuous. The left would have a policy that redistributes wealth by funding UBI through a more progressive tax scheme or the diverting of capital income. But libertarians like Charles Murray argue for a UBI that completely scraps our existing welfare state, including programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and housing subsidies. This would be extremely regressive, since money currently directed towards the poor would instead be spread out for a basic income for all. And certain benefits like health insurance can’t effectively be replaced with cash.

If you're on the same side as Charles Murray, you should get on the other side. If he ordered a chocolate shake, I'd order a vanilla.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10244
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Curious Hair wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I'm fine with UBA if the money for it comes out of other more inefficient benefits programs which for those people would qualify. Let the people get a little more money by removing the inefficiency.


https://newrepublic.com/article/143758/ ... -wrong-ubi

Quote:
But Zuckerberg reveals exactly why the left should be alarmed that Silicon Valley is taking the lead on this issue.

First, the idea that UBI has bipartisan appeal is disingenuous. The left would have a policy that redistributes wealth by funding UBI through a more progressive tax scheme or the diverting of capital income. But libertarians like Charles Murray argue for a UBI that completely scraps our existing welfare state, including programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and housing subsidies. This would be extremely regressive, since money currently directed towards the poor would instead be spread out for a basic income for all. And certain benefits like health insurance can’t effectively be replaced with cash.

If you're on the same side as Charles Murray, you should get on the other side. If he ordered a chocolate shake, I'd order a vanilla.


I'm fine with only modifying UBI to only be for people who qualify for other benefit programs, to avoid the pitfalls of Murray's approach. If it is revenue-neutral, I don't need a UBI while I am working.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
I would say insurance claims are something that a computer could likely do.

I would say it depends significantly on what line of business you're talking about.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Don Tiny wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
I would say insurance claims are something that a computer could likely do.

I would say it depends significantly on what line of business you're talking about.


I would say not for long.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82806
I doubt it is a coincidence that an alderman not running for re election is the originator of the legislation.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15048
pizza_Place: Grazianos
chaspoppcap wrote:
When I was flying in for my brothers funeral. I was listening to this guy talk about something like it.
In stead of an income tax there is a universal federal sales tax. Then everyone gets an equal payment. You want more you work. The only way it could work is if we fixed immigration and the prison system.


Sorry about your brother.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15048
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
Ardent capitalists will not like this proposal one bit.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/17/ch ... ogram.html


As long as it comes out of pockets of Democrat charitable giving, I am all for this. Also, wonder if their will be a racial test for who gets this money? Will it be given based on the racial make-up of the city(s)? How many Asians do you think will be given this charity I wonder?

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15048
pizza_Place: Grazianos
good dolphin wrote:
I doubt it is a coincidence that an alderman not running for re election is the originator of the legislation.



Maybe he is hoping that he makes the charitable list?

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65988
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
This very well may be the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my life.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80131
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Darkside wrote:
This very well may be the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my life.



Considering you're a longtime member of CFMB, I find that difficult to believe.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65988
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
This very well may be the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my life.



Considering you're a longtime member of CFMB, I find that difficult to believe.

Now that you mention it....
Nope still the stupidest.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17309
pizza_Place: Pequods
Darkside wrote:
This very well may be the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my life.

If (and this if is the only condition under which I would support this) you do away with every other welfare program, then I would be in favor of this. That is precisely what was in the proposal Milton Friedman had when he talked about the Negative Income Tax 50 years ago. In the end, it's a far more efficient system and gives people the power to either succeed or fail based upon their own decisions and merits. If they still sink with the negative income tax, then that's on them.

Of course those proposing the UBI today want it in conjunction with every other failed welfare program yet somehow expect it to yield different results

Also, can I just add that I really miss having Milton Friedman around? He is the man who got me interested in econ in the 1st place and why I eventually majored in it.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ameya Pawar
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:08 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80131
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
In the end, it's a far more efficient system and gives people the power to either succeed or fail based upon their own decisions and merits. If they still sink with the negative income tax, then that's on them.



And when they fail, then what? We let them starve in the streets?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group