| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Santino Marchiol https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=113853 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | 312player [ Wed Aug 22, 2018 6:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Santino Marchiol |
This kid is a pawn in a dirty game but he's found a way to get some leverage and be eligible to play this year..this will be the end of the sitting out one year after a transfer. https://www.google.com/amp/s/tucson.com ... a.amp.html |
|
| Author: | Keyser Soze [ Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Santino Marchiol |
The one time transfer rule is coming back. There’s no reason it shouldn’t. A coach can get up and leave for a better opportunity at any time but a player has to sit out a year. Even for the NCAA that is fucking stupid. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Santino Marchiol |
Keyser Soze wrote: The one time transfer rule is coming back. There’s no reason it shouldn’t. A coach can get up and leave for a better opportunity at any time but a player has to sit out a year. Even for the NCAA that is fucking stupid. Coaches have buyouts though. There has to be a penalty for transferring. It shouldn't cost a year of eligibility though. |
|
| Author: | Keyser Soze [ Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Santino Marchiol |
No there shouldn’t. They’re kids who made a life changing decision at 16-17 years old. If they decide they want to go to another school for whatever reason they shouldn’t be penalized for it. That’s just stupid. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Aug 22, 2018 9:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Santino Marchiol |
Keyser Soze wrote: No there shouldn’t. They’re kids who made a life changing decision at 16-17 years old. If they decide they want to go to another school for whatever reason they shouldn’t be penalized for it. That’s just stupid. It isn't a big penalty. You actually could say it isn't a penalty at all given you get two years of school for one year of playing. There just has to be something otherwise it would basically be that these players are being recruited every year. At least with the rule that they have to sit out a year a team has to allocate two years of scholarship for one year of playing(or if it happens earlier they still lost a scholarship for that year). There is a reason that no sports league has set it up where players can move like that. Players would leave the smaller schools in mass every year if there was no penalty. A school like Illinois would rebuild not through high school recruiting but through raiding the MAC and other places. It's also not a life changing decision to transfer. Players do it all the time already with the loss of a year of eligibility or their redshirt year. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Wed Aug 22, 2018 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Santino Marchiol |
Keyser Soze wrote: No there shouldn’t. They’re kids who made a life changing decision at 16-17 years old. If they decide they want to go to another school for whatever reason they shouldn’t be penalized for it. That’s just stupid. Exactly |
|
| Author: | America [ Wed Aug 22, 2018 5:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Santino Marchiol |
They fired the coach he wanted to play for. Its kinda gay that he put the new guy at A&M on blast but I like the loyalty. |
|
| Author: | Minooka Meatball [ Mon Aug 27, 2018 7:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Santino Marchiol |
Oops: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.azdese ... s-eligible |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|