There are four primary ways in which Ronan betrayed the truth in writing his book.

1. He consistently failed to confirm stories told to him by his main sources.

2. He failed to provide evidence of important communications he alleges took place between accusers and me. In most cases, Ronan doesn’t even claim to have personally seen evidence of those communications.

3. He used misleading language to manipulate readers into believing things that could easily be false, or were at least un-provable. In some cases he undeniably withheld information from the reader that would call the credibility of sources into question.

4. He routinely presented stories in a way that would suit his activist goals, as opposed to any kind of journalistic standards.

At least Matt Lauer wasn't trespassing on a construction site.

Joe Biden brought down #metoo.

Talk about an honest conversation.

I'll cut to the chase. I'll get to the point.

Why should we give benefit of the doubt to people like Matt Lauer when you weren't willing to do so in the case of Ahmaud Abery?

It is. I'll cut to the chase. Why should we give benefit of the doubt to people like Matt Lauer when you weren't willing to do so in the case of Ahmaud Arbery?

This has nothing to do with "the benefit of the doubt". This is you being a dishonest troll. As Frank put it, B Mac without the swears. These two cases have nothing to do with each other at all. If you want to call me names just be honest about it instead of this strange attempt relate these two things.

Joe Biden brought down #metoo.

Did the accuser buy Matt Lauer alcohol?

Did the accuser buy Matt Lauer alcohol?

I wonder why Lauer hasn't sued Farrow???

lol @ giving Matt Lauer credibility in this matter. Nice work WFR. Can't say I'm surprised though.

It is. I'll cut to the chase. Why should we give benefit of the doubt to people like Matt Lauer when you weren't willing to do so in the case of Ahmaud Arbery?

Probably because the fact that Farrow does not practice good journalistic standards does not mean that Lauer isn't a creep.

lol @ giving Matt Lauer credibility in this matter. Nice work WFR. Can't say I'm surprised though.

Do you think these women had non consensual sex with Lauer ?

This has nothing to do with "the benefit of the doubt". This is you being a dishonest troll. As Frank put it, B Mac without the swears. These two cases have nothing to do with each other at all. If you want to call me names just be honest about it instead of this strange attempt relate these two things.

The Me Too movement was based on a lot of lies and after the fact reconsiderations. Believe all women or accusers is a religious order like edict to weed out heretics.

Do you think these women had non consensual sex with Lauer ?

I tend to believe a guy that would lock women in a room with him would rape them. At the very least I believe it destroys any credibility that man has to speak on this topic.

The whole point is that you were certain that Arbery was up to no good. He was causing trouble in the neighborhood. He even had one little fight and the two rednecks got scared.

I have no reason to call you names. I want to know why you didn't give Arbery the same benefit of the doubt you seem to be giving Lauer?

I tend to believe a guy that would lock women in a room with him would rape them. At the very least I believe it destroys any credibility that man has to speak on this topic.