Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Minneapolis Supreme Court
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=125025		 Page 1 of 3
Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Minneapolis Supreme Court
Quote:
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a person can’t be found guilty of sexually assaulting someone, who is mentally incapacitated due to intoxication, if that person became intoxicated by voluntarily ingesting drugs or alcohol.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 027981002/

Now if they could only revoke the book deals of heroines who told their truth of victimhood.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Please move to politics.

Thanks, mods.
Author:  JORR [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
I'm sure there will be a lot of screaming about this, but if a person isn't responsible for his/her actions after they become willfully intoxicated we need to toss out all D.U.I. laws.
Author:  JORR [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Please move to politics.

Thanks, mods.



Is this really a political topic? I'd say it's a culture issue that touches on politics.
Author:  Curious Hair [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Culture and politics are one now.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Please move to politics.

Thanks, mods.
Is this really a political topic? I'd say it's a culture issue that touches on politics.
Preemptive. We all know this more than likely will end up a political discussion.
Author:  JORR [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Curious Hair wrote:
Culture and politics are one now.


I agree. I think everything is politicized now. But if we move everything to Politics, it kind of defeats the purpose.
Author:  JORR [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Please move to politics.

Thanks, mods.
Is this really a political topic? I'd say it's a culture issue that touches on politics.
Preemptive. We all know this more than likely will end up a political discussion.


You're probably right.
Author:  W_Z [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
u ever taken a shit while driving drunk thinkin bout fuckin someone??!
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
This is already the law in Minnesota. Not sure what the big deal is.

Legislature in Minn. Stat. § 609.341, subd. 7 (2020). The statute provides:
“Mentally incapacitated” means that a person under the influence of alcohol,
a narcotic, anesthetic, or any other substance, administered to that person
without the person’s agreement, lacks the judgment to give a reasoned
consent to sexual contact or sexual penetration.
Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
This is not a political issue. It's good to see that some people in positions of power don't default to believe all "victims". And this guy seems like he actually got off in the transaction, unlike master criminal Brock Turner.
Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
The Saint George Floyd Autonomous Zone does not recognize this law .
Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
badrogue17 wrote:
The Saint George Floyd Autonomous Zone does not recognize this law .


It does if you bought the booze with counterfeit $20s.
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This is not a political issue. It's good to see that some people in positions of power don't default to believe all "victims". And this guy seems like he actually got off in the transaction, unlike master criminal Brock Turner.


Quote:
The State chose not to charge Khalil with fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct which criminalizes
nonconsensual sexual contact, a charge both the State and Khalil conceded would cover
the conduct alleged in this case but which is a gross misdemeanor rather than a felony for
a first offense. See Minn. Stat. § 609.3451 (2020).


LOL
Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
SpiralStairs wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This is not a political issue. It's good to see that some people in positions of power don't default to believe all "victims". And this guy seems like he actually got off in the transaction, unlike master criminal Brock Turner.


Quote:
The State chose not to charge Khalil with fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct which criminalizes
nonconsensual sexual contact, a charge both the State and Khalil conceded would cover
the conduct alleged in this case but which is a gross misdemeanor rather than a felony for
a first offense. See Minn. Stat. § 609.3451 (2020).


LOL


Just like you to pile on a POC.
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
It's a shame. Knowing about tasta could have helped you understand this case better.
Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 3:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Thank God the world is safe for creepy fucks who want to fuck passed out chicks.
Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Anyone who ever had sex with a drunk chick is a creepy fuck.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Being drunk and "mentally incapacitated" are two different things. I'd except you to be an expert on the latter, having lived with it for so long.
Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Anyone who ever had sex with a drunk chick is a creepy fuck.


You know being drunk isn't the same as being passed out. Come on.

Are you telling me if you are at a party and a girl is passed out drunk, you're looking at it like a free chance to score? Or if you saw someone fondling her and trying to fuck her, you wouldn't think that guy is a creepy fuck?
Author:  This Ends in Antioch [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 4:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Being drunk and "mentally incapacitated" are two different things.

And should you have a preference between those two options, you’ll have an easy time picking a winner in FarveFan v. Frank.
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Terry's Peeps wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Anyone who ever had sex with a drunk chick is a creepy fuck.


You know being drunk isn't the same as being passed out. Come on.

Are you telling me if you are at a party and a girl is passed out drunk, you're looking at it like a free chance to score? Or if you saw someone fondling her and trying to fuck her, you wouldn't think that guy is a creepy fuck?


She was just pretending to be passed out!
Author:  good dolphin [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
I don't think this ruling means what the writer appears to say it means.

It's not like you can just go around dead horsing women.

It's just that a person can't claim rape based on lack of consent due to impariment.

No still means no. It's just that yes means yes, even tomorrow if there is some regret.
Author:  KDdidit [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Finally a win for white men. We were in a rough stretch, but now that we can screw passed out chicks, maybe we’ll get that big momentum back.
Author:  shakes [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
SpiralStairs wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Anyone who ever had sex with a drunk chick is a creepy fuck.


You know being drunk isn't the same as being passed out. Come on.

Are you telling me if you are at a party and a girl is passed out drunk, you're looking at it like a free chance to score? Or if you saw someone fondling her and trying to fuck her, you wouldn't think that guy is a creepy fuck?


She was just pretending to be passed out!


:lol: :lol:
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
All the attention this case is getting likely means the law that WfR is so fond of is going to be changed to cover what happened here.

:lol:

Shout out to the MN Supreme Court indeed.
Author:  IkeSouth [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
what the fuck is this law? now girls have more reasons not to get shitface drunk? this is the opposite world i want to live in.
Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
Terry's Peeps wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Anyone who ever had sex with a drunk chick is a creepy fuck.


You know being drunk isn't the same as being passed out. Come on.

Are you telling me if you are at a party and a girl is passed out drunk, you're looking at it like a free chance to score? Or if you saw someone fondling her and trying to fuck her, you wouldn't think that guy is a creepy fuck?


I don't know the exact circumstances of these cases. And likely neither do any of the participants. Also, I don't believe that it said she passed out. It said she "blacked out", and apparently you can drive all over the suburbs and go to casinos in that state.

The problem with this is the principle. Women are equal. They can do anything a man can. They are stronger than men in fact. Unless they get really drunk and go home with a guy. Then believe all women. They are damsels. It's on the guy if the girl is drinking.
Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
SpiralStairs wrote:
All the attention this case is getting likely means the law that WfR is so fond of is going to be changed to cover what happened here.

:lol:

Shout out to the MN Supreme Court indeed.


Big win for SS! The legislature should just pass a law that any women that feels objectified should be allowed to have any man arrested. Believe all women.
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Minneapolis Supreme Court
What is it that you think happened in this case?
Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/