Bagels wrote:
wait is this that Loyola bitch ?
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Sr. Jean https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=128441 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Jul 26, 2022 2:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Sr. Jean |
103 years old today sticking around to bring us luck in the Atlantic 10 I'm old and she is more than double my age. Lot's of life to live. |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Tue Jul 26, 2022 3:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
wait is this that Loyola bitch ? |
|
| Author: | Peter Puck [ Tue Jul 26, 2022 3:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
She's going to get deposed... Gociman v. Loyola University of Chicago, No. 21-1304 (July 25, 2022) N.D. Ill., E. Div. Affirmed and vacated in part and remanded Dist. Ct. erred in granting defendant-University’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs-students’ class action, alleging that defendant breached contract by shutting down its campus and its in-person instruction, as well as deprived them of access to on-campus facilities during 2020 pandemic and shifted all coursework to online instruction only, where defendant had promised them in-person instruction and access to on-campus facilities in exchange for tuition and fees. While Dist. Ct. based dismissal, in part, on holding that plaintiffs had essentially pleaded educational malpractice action, Ct. of Appeals found that plaintiffs could proceed on instant action, where: (1) instant case was not educational malpractice claim, since plaintiffs’ lawsuit did not require analysis of quality of their education; and (2) lawsuit alleged existence of implied contract that was formed by defendant’s publications that promised in-person instruction and access to on-campus facilities in exchange for tuition and fees. Ct. further noted that plaintiffs, who sought refund of tuition and fees, had enrolled in on-campus program and had paid higher tuition and fees than students enrolled in defendant’s online program. Dist. Ct., though, did not err in dismissing plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim, where plaintiff had improperly alleged existence of contract between parties. Plaintiff, though, will be permitted on remand to file amended complaint on their unjust enrichment claim that omits allegations of existence of contract. (Partial dissent filed.) |
|
| Author: | Nardi [ Tue Jul 26, 2022 4:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
Bagels wrote: wait is this that Loyola bitch ?
|
|
| Author: | Tall Midget [ Wed Jul 27, 2022 1:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
It will be poignant to reflect on Sister Jean's gradual return to obscurity as Loyola's basketball program slowly declines over the next few years. Poor Sister Jean, poor Loyola, poor Dolphin. |
|
| Author: | Derplington [ Wed Jul 27, 2022 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
Bagels wrote: wait is this that Loyola bitch ? Have some class. They're called "broads" in today's PC world |
|
| Author: | JORR [ Sat Sep 03, 2022 11:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
| Author: | Hussra [ Sat Sep 03, 2022 11:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
|
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Sat Sep 03, 2022 11:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
Bagels wrote: wait is this that Loyola bitch ? Wow Enjoy Hell |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sat Sep 03, 2022 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
GD younger than 60? |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Sat Sep 03, 2022 2:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
Lot of mileage on dolphin. |
|
| Author: | Nardi [ Sat Sep 03, 2022 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sr. Jean |
Caller Bob wrote: Bagels wrote: wait is this that Loyola bitch ? Wow Enjoy Hell It's a top 2 post this month, Bob, right after Handsome Squidward. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|