Telegram Sam wrote:
Drop In's right. It was on "Hit and Run."
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Conor McKnight https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=67922 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | bigfan [ Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Conor McKnight |
Excellent questions to Hoyer about why he thought Rizzo was brought up to early? What things he saw that made him think it was too early. Hoyer said that when Rizzo did poorly, he started changing his swing and getting away from what he did well in the minors. Been waiting for someone to ask this question for 2 months now! as all I heard is Hoyer saying he brought Rizzo up to early. |
|
| Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
What show is Conor hosting that he was able to pull an interview with Hoyer? |
|
| Author: | Drop In [ Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Urlacher's missing neck wrote: What show is Conor hosting that he was able to pull an interview with Hoyer? Hit and Run, or as I still enjoy calling it, Hit and Ralph. I started listening to this every Sunday last year. Rozner and Spiegel are a great pairing. As Big Fan stated, Connor was solid during the interview and has been a good fill-in for Spiegel today. |
|
| Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Did he ask Hoyer if they had corrected Rizzo in San Diego or if they are still in the process of doing it now that both are with the Cubs. |
|
| Author: | Telegram Sam [ Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Drop In's right. It was on "Hit and Run." |
|
| Author: | Drop In [ Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Telegram Sam wrote: Drop In's right. It was on "Hit and Run."
|
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Drop In wrote: Urlacher's missing neck wrote: What show is Conor hosting that he was able to pull an interview with Hoyer? Hit and Run, or as I still enjoy calling it, Hit and Ralph. I started listening to this every Sunday last year. Rozner and Spiegel are a great pairing. As Big Fan stated, Connor was solid during the interview and has been a good fill-in for Spiegel today. Spiegs already missing his Hit N Run appearances huh? |
|
| Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
For a guy that won a contest, I have been generally happy with him on the air. After just a few weeks on the Hawks beat, he is already better than Jesse Rogers. |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Connor is a pro. He has worked out just a little bit better than Maya Gavin. Connor has a bright future. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Scorehead wrote: Connor is a pro. He has worked out just a little bit better than Maya Gavin. Connor has a bright future. +1 |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Scorehead wrote: Connor is a pro. He has worked out just a little bit better than Maya Gavin. Connor has a bright future. Yep. From a distance it seems that good ole' Connor, who in Meats eyes is probably "just a producer!", is putting more effort into and adding more onto Hit and Run than Speigs is. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
He's definitely not awful. Arrow pointing up. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Conor and Shep, try it! |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Welcome to the Connor Bandwagon gentleman |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Connor's heading out to that Arizona crib that Laurence Holmes was staying at while he was covering Spring Training... |
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Conor is already better than both Mully and Hanley combined... |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
He's good, but "Connor McKnight" is a really douchey name. I'm sure that was beyond his control, though. When your given name is Connor McKnight, it's like you're already destined for broadcasting. I look forward to the day he replaces Eric and Kathy at the Mix, as host of McKnight in the McMorning. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Curious Hair wrote: He's good, but "Connor McKnight" is a really douchey name. I'm sure that was beyond his control, though. When your given name is Connor McKnight, it's like you're already destined for broadcasting. I look forward to the day he replaces Eric and Kathy at the Mix, as host of McKnight in the McMorning. Well, The Mix always has someone who could host morning drive if Eric & Kathy eventually leave. That's Brian "The Whipping Boy" Paruch. Remember him? |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Yes, but ten years from now, there'll be no Paruchs at all. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Conor McKnight |
Curious Hair wrote: Yes, but ten years from now, there'll be no Paruchs at all.
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|