I watched Die Hard 2 this weekend and it was still excellent. I say we elect McClane for president.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| John McClane https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=70931 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Mini Ditka [ Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | John McClane |
I watched Die Hard 2 this weekend and it was still excellent. I say we elect McClane for president.
|
|
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
isn't there a die hard 5 coming out in the near/future? this guy just doesn't take a hint... i wish he'd get back into smoking and stop being a role model for the damn kids! |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
Die Hard 2 blows. |
|
| Author: | K Effective [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
Just finished watching it on ION Television as we speak. Still a CLASSIC! Yippee KII Yaa indeed. |
|
| Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
Douchebag wrote: Die Hard 2 blows. It was definitely a letdown. The last one was God-awful. I understand it's an action flick but there has to be some degree of plausibility.
|
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Douchebag wrote: Die Hard 2 blows. It was definitely a letdown. The last one was God-awful. I understand it's an action flick but there has to be some degree of plausibility.That's what was so great about the the first one. The 2nd one was, well, alright and the 3rd I really enjoyed. The 4th was a mess and PG-13 w/ Justin Long as the side kick....fuck that and fuck you Hollywood! |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Douchebag wrote: Die Hard 2 blows. It was definitely a letdown. The last one was God-awful. I understand it's an action flick but there has to be some degree of plausibility.Most definitely. Die Hard 4 was an abomination. |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
I liked the last one... |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
lipidquadcab wrote: I liked the last one... You might want to think about wrapping yourself in a towel and cause yourself to overheat ... |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
Douchebag wrote: lipidquadcab wrote: I liked the last one... You might want to think about wrapping yourself in a towel and cause yourself to overheat ...  I'm going to stuff myself in a box and send it to Microsoft...defective... |
|
| Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
Fuck that. Im with Lipid. I liked the last Die Hard. It can't compare to the first... not much can compare to Alan Rickman and Bruce Willis on the same TV at the same time... but it was still good enough. |
|
| Author: | Mini Ditka [ Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John McClane |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: I understand it's an action flick but there has to be some degree of plausibility. The runaway scene where he lights the jet fuel is epic. I don't care if it's plausible, I just wanted to see the terrorists plane explode. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|