FavreFan wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Walt's got SomeGuy runnin' over hot coals!
Where is SPMACK to post about it??!!?!?!?!??!?
huh?
Maybe time for some warm milk and a nap, big guy.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Kansas City Royals https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=89767 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Kansas City Royals |
For making it to the World Series...despite having the worst manager,hitting the fewest dingers,bunting too much and being the Anti Saber Team of All Time. Congrats! |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: For making it to the World Series...despite having the worst manager,hitting the fewest dingers,bunting too much and being the Anti Saber Team of All Time. Congrats! Despite all those things? It seems that the Anti-Saber Thing has gotten them to a World Series.... |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
SomeGuy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: For making it to the World Series...despite having the worst manager,hitting the fewest dingers,bunting too much and being the Anti Saber Team of All Time. Congrats! Despite all those things? It seems that the Anti-Saber Thing has gotten them to a World Series.... huh |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Just forget it. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Walt's got SomeGuy runnin' over hot coals! |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
FavreFan wrote: Walt's got SomeGuy runnin' over hot coals! Where is SPMACK to post about it??!!?!?!?!??!? |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
SomeGuy wrote: FavreFan wrote: Walt's got SomeGuy runnin' over hot coals! Where is SPMACK to post about it??!!?!?!?!??!? Drinking an Angry Orchard at some OTB in Rockford probably. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
FavreFan wrote: SomeGuy wrote: FavreFan wrote: Walt's got SomeGuy runnin' over hot coals! Where is SPMACK to post about it??!!?!?!?!??!? Drinking an Angry Orchard at some OTB in Rockford probably. Yep. Sittin' there, sippin' on some apple sauce beer, makin' bets and HATIN'. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
SomeGuy wrote: FavreFan wrote: Walt's got SomeGuy runnin' over hot coals! Where is SPMACK to post about it??!!?!?!?!??!? huh? |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: SomeGuy wrote: FavreFan wrote: Walt's got SomeGuy runnin' over hot coals! Where is SPMACK to post about it??!!?!?!?!??!? huh? Maybe time for some warm milk and a nap, big guy. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
FavreFan wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: SomeGuy wrote: FavreFan wrote: Walt's got SomeGuy runnin' over hot coals! Where is SPMACK to post about it??!!?!?!?!??!? huh? Maybe time for some warm milk and a nap, big guy.
|
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
You're out to lunch, Walt! |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Wed Oct 15, 2014 7:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
SomeGuy wrote: You're out to lunch, Walt! Want me to bring you back a sammwich? |
|
| Author: | Tad Queasy [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: For making it to the World Series...despite having the worst manager,hitting the fewest dingers,bunting too much and being the Anti Saber Team of All Time. Congrats! I'm not a big baseball guy. Why is he a bad manager? How much bunting constitutes too much bunting and why is it bad? |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: For making it to the World Series...despite having the worst manager,hitting the fewest dingers,bunting too much and being the Anti Saber Team of All Time. Congrats! They are not anti saber They're winning with power hitting and power pitching. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
rogers park bryan wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: For making it to the World Series...despite having the worst manager,hitting the fewest dingers,bunting too much and being the Anti Saber Team of All Time. Congrats! They are not anti saber They're winning with power hitting and power pitching. So there are two types of Saber metrics regular season and post season? I was really liking your posts.....too bad  I lost all respect I had for you
|
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: I lost all respect I had for you 
|
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
[quote="Walt Williams Neck"]So there are two types of Saber metrics regular season and post season? I was really liking your posts.....too bad I lost all respect I had for you [/quote]I don't think there are really saber metric anything. Its dynamic But if you're talking about it in the sense Saber= Power, On base Non saber: fielding, speed They're as much the first one as the second. They're hitting homers at the rate of a power hitting team Consider that my triple R (Request for Respect Reinstatement) [img]http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view8/20131226/4935715/chappelle-mic-drop-o.gif[/img] |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
rogers park bryan wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: So there are two types of Saber metrics regular season and post season? I was really liking your posts.....too bad I lost all respect I had for you I don't think there are really saber metric anything. Its dynamic But if you're talking about it in the sense Saber= Power, On base Non saber: fielding, speed They're as much the first one as the second. They're hitting homers at the rate of a power hitting team Consider that my triple R (Request for Respect Reinstatement)  You have Morphed into FF and Frank....seek help man! |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: So there are two types of Saber metrics regular season and post season? I was really liking your posts.....too bad I lost all respect I had for you I don't think there are really saber metric anything. Its dynamic But if you're talking about it in the sense Saber= Power, On base Non saber: fielding, speed They're as much the first one as the second. They're hitting homers at the rate of a power hitting team Consider that my triple R (Request for Respect Reinstatement) You have Morphed into FF and Frank....seek help man! 
|
|
| Author: | JORR [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Tad Queasy wrote: How much bunting constitutes too much bunting and why is it bad? Any sacrifice bunting that is not done by a pitcher. It's bad because an out is worth far more than 90 feet on the bases. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How much bunting constitutes too much bunting and why is it bad? Any sacrifice bunting that is not done by a pitcher. It's bad because an out is worth far more than 90 feet on the bases. ie the Giants game winner over the Cards that probably turned the series....ps. I never respected you
|
|
| Author: | JORR [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How much bunting constitutes too much bunting and why is it bad? Any sacrifice bunting that is not done by a pitcher. It's bad because an out is worth far more than 90 feet on the bases. ie the Giants game winner over the Cards that probably turned the series....ps. I never respected you Fortunately, I don't concern myself with whether or not I am respected by the functionally illiterate. 
|
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How much bunting constitutes too much bunting and why is it bad? Any sacrifice bunting that is not done by a pitcher. It's bad because an out is worth far more than 90 feet on the bases. ie the Giants game winner over the Cards that probably turned the series....ps. I never respected you Fortunately, I don't concern myself with whether or not I am respected by the functionally illiterate. Let's address the point the Giants did WIN the game by bunting....it's easy...yes or no! |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How much bunting constitutes too much bunting and why is it bad? Any sacrifice bunting that is not done by a pitcher. It's bad because an out is worth far more than 90 feet on the bases. ie the Giants game winner over the Cards that probably turned the series....ps. I never respected you Fortunately, I don't concern myself with whether or not I am respected by the functionally illiterate. 
|
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
| Watching Walt and JORR is like watching Grumpy Old Men
|
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How much bunting constitutes too much bunting and why is it bad? Any sacrifice bunting that is not done by a pitcher. It's bad because an out is worth far more than 90 feet on the bases. ie the Giants game winner over the Cards that probably turned the series....ps. I never respected you You are correct Walt. Sabre metrics is taking a beating in the 2014 playoffs. Long live the bunt. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
RFDC wrote: :lol: Watching Walt and JORR is like watching Grumpy Old Men  Watching RFDC and anyone is like watching Dumb and Dumber |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
|
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kansas City Royals |
Dont you DARE double reply to me, WALT |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|