bigfan wrote:
Since the one and done rule hit college hoops, the Landscape has changed.
top 10 high school kids are looking for where they can get exposure nationally and Champaign Urbana isnt on that list.
They can get there, maybe but they need to develop a history of winning again. not just one decent year or 2 wins int he NCAA. a program needs to develop now. Go get some big guys that just dont have the skills they need yet, they take longer to get good, but if they get there, you really have something.
Outside of kentucky, UCLA, Duke, UNC, Kansas, Arizona, .....would Groce leave if Louisville came knocking? Texas? Oklahoma? Schools that sink money into the arena and the program? I think he would...thus making it a stepping stone of a program. Illinois's best chance is getting connected to the CPS feeder system, which the top programs are already in.
However, Illinois isnt connected into any Prep school system like Duke, UNC and Kansas are on the east coast or the way AZ and UCLA are from Bishop-Grom, or Findlay....these guys are recruited to come to these schools....years ahead of day 1. The Findlay facilties are nicer than the U of I facilities.
Groce is a stepping stone of a coach as well. Its not that he isnt good...because I think he is....but a top 100 player who gets calls from guys he knows...Self, Coach K, Pitino, Donovan.....sorry, but that call from coach Groce isnt returned.
Groce has a chance to be one of those guys. He has a program with some tools to develop a good team that gets National rankings, national TV and face time.
Then when that happens the BIG TIME programs come knocking....most guys like Groce are walking.
Shaka Smart didnt. Its a very unique case, but it was his chance to get a shot at one of these elite top 10 programs.
What you're saying is true in that Illinois isn't likely to have a super-team loaded with one and done guys. But that's a double-edged sword for teams like Kentucky. They have to constantly keep reloading. And that has resulted in getting beaten by Robert Morris and the rise of programs like Butler and VCU.
Twenty-five years ago I would have been extremely depressed had my team lost Snider and Alexander on signing day after it appeared they were coming. Now, it's not as big a deal. To tell you the truth, I'm not sure you're better off with one year of Snider than with four years of Tate. Having a guy like Snider was certainly going to set back the development of a guy like Tate, if not causing him to transfer to a mid-major where he might kick your teeth in in a second round game a couple seasons down the road when Snider is gone.