It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 4:08 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:36 pm
Posts: 793
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/portal/ncaahome?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/ncaa/ncaa/media+and+events/press+room/news+release+archive/2010/announcements/20100422+cbs+turner+ncaa+rights+agreement+rls


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Wow didn't expand to 96 teams and they will show every game of the tourney in real time...this actually sounds like it makes sense....this cant be real

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
Great news. They must have heard the backlash from the 96 teams idea.

Figuring out how to broadcast every game is great too. The online stuff was good but not as good as HD through cable.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
I'd like to see the 68vs 61, 62 v 67, 63 v 66 and 64 v 65 be bubble teams that are fighting to get into a 12 seed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
What is a bracket with 68 teams going to look like?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
RFDC wrote:
What is a bracket with 68 teams going to look like?



My Guess is that the 3 extra teams are going to be play-ins for a 16 seed to face the 1's

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
RFDC wrote:
What is a bracket with 68 teams going to look like?

Most likely four play in games versus one...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
So 4 play in games instead of just one. That works. Just make it so the play in games are between at large teams only.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
So 4 play in games instead of just one. That works. Just make it so the play in games are between at large teams only.

That's crazy. "Congrats on your #1 seed Kentucky, you get to face Arizona. #2 seed Kansas will face Northwest Missouri State"

Three more "major" teams will get in, but they'll still be 12-13 seeds. The play-ins will weed out the non-contending conferences.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
Irish Boy wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
So 4 play in games instead of just one. That works. Just make it so the play in games are between at large teams only.

That's crazy. "Congrats on your #1 seed Kentucky, you get to face Arizona. #2 seed Kansas will face Northwest Missouri State"
If they were to do that, the "play-in" games would likely face the 5th seed.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Irish Boy wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
So 4 play in games instead of just one. That works. Just make it so the play in games are between at large teams only.

That's crazy. "Congrats on your #1 seed Kentucky, you get to face Arizona. #2 seed Kansas will face Northwest Missouri State"

Three more "major" teams will get in, but they'll still be 12-13 seeds. The play-ins will weed out the non-contending conferences.

Well shit, I forgot to think that far. I just didn't want to see a small school win their conference and then not get into the field of 64.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
So 4 play in games instead of just one. That works. Just make it so the play in games are between at large teams only.

That's crazy. "Congrats on your #1 seed Kentucky, you get to face Arizona. #2 seed Kansas will face Northwest Missouri State"
If they were to do that, the "play-in" games would likely face the 5th seed.

Ok, last 4 in vs first 4 out for the 9 seed.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 2:46 pm
Posts: 6251
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
I think the play in winners will play the 1 seeds.

Well this will end the March Madness package on Directv.

Well we hear from the NFL today, saying they are mad this news came out on Draft day, like Selig was mad about the Mcnabb trade on opening day and Vitale mad Tiger was talking on the day of the national championship game, I would say no the NFL will not be mad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Ok, last 4 in vs first 4 out for the 9 seed.

That's better, but I still think it's not entirely fair. I mean, realistically, those 4 play in teams would be worlds better than the tagalongs that fill out the bottom end of the bracket. Why make them play seven games to win the championship, and let the detritus from the MEAC play only six (theoretically; of course they'll never win). But I'd prefer having them play for the 12 seed or whatever than the 16 seed.

And before people say "Butler!" or "George Mason!", those teams were five and eleven seeds. They were good enough for at large births anyway.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:14 pm
Posts: 155
Location: chicago
Does this mean no more DirecTV Mega Madness and suck-ass CBS switching away from games b/c Duke or UNC is about to tip off?

_________________
"i drink when and where i'm supposed to, at home and by myself."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group