What?

What?

As 2 guys I have met and seem to be smart guys (Badrogue and WZ) had no problem understanding exactly what I meant and exactly what happened, why do you think it was so hard for you to understand what occurred?

As 2 guys I have met and seem to be smart guys (Badrogue and WZ) had no problem understanding exactly what I meant and exactly what happened, why do you think it was so hard for you to understand what occurred?

Yeah ummmm thats not exactly going to bolster your argument there big fella.

I don't know where to start. It's a ridiculous premise.

First, Anthony could have been referring to any number of things: youth, athleticism, All-Americans, etc. Kentucky clearly wins in all these categories, so it would usually be safe to assume that they are also quicker.

Second, comparing quickness to intelligence is ridiculous. If you don't understand the difference, then I would venture a guess that you are overly-sensitive to "reverse" racism. If Steve Kerr would have said "believe it or not, Kentucky is smarter"... that would warrant some explanation. Greg Anthony's comment does not. You're looking for things where they don't exist. And it doesn't matter to me who agrees with you.

bigfanpoppcap

bigfanpoppcap

Lets not talk about who didnt see things the right way Mr. 'Hawkeye Vince Steal Kentucky"

Not looking for anything, he said it.

When you brought up Kerr, and the fantasy scenario that never happened, you were looking for something.

I looked at the second half line, instead of the game line ONE TIME, and you somehow equate that to you looking for "reverse racism" a la Chaspoppcap?

I heard the comment about Wisky being quicker. Like you, I disagree with that statement. When you brought up Kerr, and the "what if" scenario, including "Jessie", you lost me.

Cmon leash you're being a little naive there. You know exactly what Anthony was referring to. Why else would he use a qualifier like its surprising ? Because Wisconsin is mostly white and its a surprise to most people they would be quicker than a team full of blacks. Thats exactly what he meant by that.

Even if that is what he meant, it's a ridiculous comparison to "intelligence."

I don't want to take a ride down history lane to explain the prejudices, scars and memories that accompany calling black people less intelligent. To compare it to a debate about quickness is ignorant at best.

I don't want to take a ride down history lane to explain the prejudices, scars and memories that accompany calling black people less intelligent. .

Chus do you think Anthony would have mentioned the word surprise in stating that Wisconsin was a quicker team if they were starting 5 blacks?

Are you a 20 some year old white kid, whom I guess grew up in a white burb of Chicago?

Then what do you think he meant? I think it is an easy question to answer

What? You are a fucking idiot. You always go with these personal attacks like you are "in the know" and everyone else just grew up in some clueless area with no experience. It's frustrating to argue with you, and it's not just because I can't understand what you are saying half the time.

I think they're both terrible assumptions / sterotypes to make . Yet depending on who makes them, they certainly are treated differently.

I think they're both terrible assumptions / sterotypes to make . Yet depending on who makes them, they certainly are treated differently.