Chicago Fanatics Message Board • View topic

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » FANTASY-ROTO

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Trade ruling

Page 1 of 1

[ 9 posts ]

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

jackref

Post subject: Trade ruling

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:49 am

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:10 pm
Posts: 3770
Location: NW Burbs
pizza_Place: Old World Pizza in Melrose Park

Need some help on this one.

Team A trades Matthew Stafford to Team B for Lance Moore straight up.

Team A already has Vick and Ryan as his QBs - Team B has Eli Manning and Fitzpatrick.
Team A has Santana Moss, Lee Evans, Brandon Lloyd as his WR
Team B has Nicks, Boldin, Calvin Johnson, and Lance Moore

Is this a fair trade?

In my mind I say no - of those 4 WR I would think any of them but Lance Moore would be acceptable, but that guy is a borderline WR3.

Thoughts?

_________________

Bobby Heenan wrote:

Oh...Eastern Illinois. They contacted me. I didn't take the entrance exam because I had 64 crayons instead of 3. But I loved going through Central Illinois. Watching people on bad cooked up Tide is the best.

Top

Northside_Dan

Post subject: Re: Trade ruling

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:51 am

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery

It's a little uneven for sure. Not sure why Team B would accept that trade unless he's a big lions fan. I'm not sure it's egregious enough to veto if that's what you are asking though

_________________
Team Cutler.

Top

jackref

Post subject: Re: Trade ruling

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:56 am

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:10 pm
Posts: 3770
Location: NW Burbs
pizza_Place: Old World Pizza in Melrose Park

Northside_Dan wrote:

It's a little uneven for sure. Not sure why Team B would accept that trade unless he's a big lions fan. I'm not sure it's egregious enough to veto if that's what you are asking though

Yea that is my dilemma - do I veto it or not.

Team A is 5-3 and Team B is 4-4. So its not like either team is out of it, but I don't see how this trade really helps Team A in any way. I am positive he could have gotten more for Stafford from other team owners.

_________________

Bobby Heenan wrote:

Top

mel junior

Post subject: Re: Trade ruling

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:06 am

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.

I don't think either Stafford or Moore are much more than bye week fill ins - I'd let the deal slide.

Top

Drop In

Post subject: Re: Trade ruling

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:13 am

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More

Not worth a veto. It's just an odd deal.

_________________

Telegram Sam wrote:

I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.

Top

Big Chicagoan

Post subject: Re: Trade ruling

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:09 am

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove

Seems fine to me. Both are mediocre fantasy players. No harm in trading one for another.

Top

jackref

Post subject: Re: Trade ruling

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:20 pm

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:10 pm
Posts: 3770
Location: NW Burbs
pizza_Place: Old World Pizza in Melrose Park

Cool. Thanks for the ruling

_________________

Bobby Heenan wrote:

Top

reents

Post subject: Re: Trade ruling

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:58 pm

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 2:46 pm
Posts: 6251
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut

It seems like a fair trade, because I like Stafford, but right is a little injury prone and Moore is not a bad player, brings punt returns and Brees does throw to him.

Top

FIRST TIME CALLER

Post subject: Re: Trade ruling

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:17 am

Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 7:32 pm
Posts: 214

fair trade ,let it go through

Top

Page 1 of 1

[ 9 posts ]

Trade ruling

Who is online