BlazingSize wrote:
He does argue unrelated points but it's more stupidity than any technique.
He can only analyize by using analogies. The whole discussion becomes about the analogies and whether they apply. Nothing is learned or solved or even expressed.
An argument about Frank Thomas becomes one about Sosa, drifts into Zambrano, Zito, Burhley, ricochetes from there to another sport, team, position, or ownership, and crashlands somewhere around whether college athletes should be paid or what the Coach would do.
He's just stupid.
Jauron should not have been fired, Orton should still be the QB, Errol Flynn was our greatest actor, and how can Dusty Springfield be in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame ahead of Connie Francis?