It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 3:48 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:49 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:21 pm
Posts: 850
Location: T.B. Diddler's
The WISE GUYS!

Image

_________________
My girlfriend has a bigger penis than your's does.

Fantasy Football is to Football as Gay Porn is to Gay Sex. Hey, I'm saying a good thing about Fantasy Football!

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 2:37 am 
Keeping Score - I didn't come here looking for your personal web log, so go get your own blog if you want to spew forth, but don't waste our time. Score Producer as Guest


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:31 am 
Anonymous wrote:
The only really stupid one is the one trying to make excuses for the failure of the score to increase it's audience AGAIN. The last time the excuse was that the new lineup wasn't in place, you and your favorite station just keeping losing and making excuses. It's old and tiresome.
The other two stations grew and the score continues to fall on the ratings list of all stations, but I guess that point is too complex for a shill like you.
You are too boring to continue to deal with.


I can't see why this is so difficult to understand. ESPN airing the play-by-play of the Sox would ABSOLUTELY prevent the score from gaining listeners during that time. In fact, that's likely why the ratings were steady because during the evening slot when the sox were on MVP, the score had fewer listeners than a normal night...because a huge majority of those regular listeners had the radio broadcast on. If you're in teh car and the Sox are playing in the World Series at that very moment. what are you going to be listening to? There's no debate, and it wouldn't matter what's on the score. Not to mention, they were the flagship at the time and the majority of fans of a particular team tend to stick with the flagship during the big stretch.

Sports is a very specific audience. Sports fans are going to pick between one of two stations in this town, and when the Sox are in the series, there isn't much the score could've done. Unless you are complete loser (and there's at least one on this board) you're not listening to two stations at once.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:58 am 
Come On, Come On - 3 things from the Radio 101 playbook: The Sox are the second banana baseball team in this, so you're not gonna have a big jump in listeners anyway; and since most people would rather WATCH a Sox world Series than Listen to it - again, not a big jump in listeners; and since radio ratings are averaged over a 3 month period and the six only played 4 World Series games in about a week - again, WMVP gets no bump from that. If you don't believe me, check the Comiskey attendance, they're just not a big draw in person or on the radio. If they were, WMVP would be in the Top Ten; instead they barely sniffed the top Twenty.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:18 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
Damn! I'm really beginning to think you're sleeping with North.

Dude?!?!

Have you ever been laid?

Other than by Mike of course.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:41 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
Who is this guy? Can you be serious?

TWO sports stations.

one 99% local and one 75% (at least) national.


YOU ARE TELLING ME THAT MVP WON LAST MONTH BECAUSE OF THE SOX?

If I want to hear about my Sox, I would listen to the "LOCAL" station. "LOCAL" reaction. "LOCAL" media types and guests.

Sure MVP had the team but they have T-W-O ( 2 ) "LOCAL" shows.

Dan Patrick, Jim Rome do it for ya on the White Sox?

AT best the Sox helped but the National shows should help the Score get better ratings at the same time slots. Apparently they dont.

People in THIS city would rather listen to a NATIONAL sports show talking about the Yankees, T.O., Selig, and the NBA dress code over a "LOCAL" show hosted by this DIPSHIT with three teams doing so well in CHICAGO.

Thats is the bottom line. And that is sad!


Oh come on, we all know North is king of talk radio!! LOL!!!!!!
It is sad, but very true, that the station that is "local" puts out such an inferior product. No matter what keeping score tries to tell people, the score puts out an inferior product and listeners know it. Your post states the case very well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:11 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:54 pm
Posts: 399
In my personal opinion, I think WSCR would spank WMVP without any doubts, if there was a qualified co-host to keep up with North (or that North could keep up with?), and they get rid of the non-sports talk.

Having said that, I think more people just listen to Mike & Mike right now. I think that is a valid belief.

No offense, I don't think Stock and Jocks is the reason, and I think everybody knows Murph and Fred is not the morning show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 10:02 pm
Posts: 121
Contempt wrote:
In my personal opinion, I think WSCR would spank WMVP without any doubts, if there was a qualified co-host to keep up with North (or that North could keep up with?), and they get rid of the non-sports talk.

Having said that, I think more people just listen to Mike & Mike right now. I think that is a valid belief.

No offense, I don't think Stock and Jocks is the reason, and I think everybody knows Murph and Fred is not the morning show.


At this point, I would take four hours of Stocks & Jocks over Pappy.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:19 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:33 am
Posts: 226
Keeping Score,

Flawed or not, the ratings are the scorecard for the radio business. They have been for a long time. The excuses you are making about ESPN manipulating the ratings, or stocks and jocks making people forget to change the station are ridiculous. You like the North show, good for you. But open your eyes, you are out numbered in this category by a landslide. And you know what? The ratings back it up, so enjoy the North show. You're part of a very unique group.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82202
Ratings conversation is fairly boring stuff. What I would like to know is whether the Sox increased the overall pool of people listening to sports talk. Did 1000 and 670 see a combined rise that it would have a chance to sustain.

Also Keeping, I think you meant apex not zenith.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:27 pm 
Keeping Score wrote:
Quote:
The Sox are the second banana baseball team in this, so you're not gonna have a big jump in listeners anyway


When a team has the best record in baseball for most of the year, which then turns into a compelling pennant race down the stretch, which leads to the dethroning of the reigning World Champions, and then on to next series which brought on a complete media blitz with the whole AJ thing and all, and then finally winning the WORLD SERIES - the first any Chicago team has seen since like the beginning of time.......um.....that whole "second banana" thing just doesn't wash.......in other words...it is N/A = NOT APPLICABLE = This Year. Maybe in most every other year - but certainly not this one.

Even when you had the whole city talking Sox already, a lot of people on this very board were jumping down Murph's throat for not talking about the Sox enough. The Sox didn't seem too "Second banannaish" when most were passionately ripping Murph a new one.

And how about the famous Danny Mac thread. Some were ripping into him for missing the day after the clincher, because they called it the biggest day in Chicago Sports in the last 20 years. And if it wasn't for the '85 Bears, it would've been the biggest event in Chicago Sports History period!
Heck, it even compelled Mac to finally sign in(for a change) and make his "first" official post. (Not counting his numerous "Guest" postings)

Anyways, NOBODY plays "second bananna" to ANYBODY considering all of those circumstances.


Average attendance at a Cubs game: 40,000.
Average attendance at a Sox game: 20,000. (during a World Series year!) This math thing is really very easy. It's the same with radio: WGN got huge ratings with the Cubs - WMVP got almost nothing with the Sox - that's why they bailed on the deal and let WSCR have it. What other hard cold facts do you need?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:31 pm 
Factually speaking the White Sox averaged 31,000 this past year


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 2:25 pm 
Not Keeping Score wrote:
Keeping Score wrote:
Quote:
The Sox are the second banana baseball team in this, so you're not gonna have a big jump in listeners anyway


When a team has the best record in baseball for most of the year, which then turns into a compelling pennant race down the stretch, which leads to the dethroning of the reigning World Champions, and then on to next series which brought on a complete media blitz with the whole AJ thing and all, and then finally winning the WORLD SERIES - the first any Chicago team has seen since like the beginning of time.......um.....that whole "second banana" thing just doesn't wash.......in other words...it is N/A = NOT APPLICABLE = This Year. Maybe in most every other year - but certainly not this one.

Even when you had the whole city talking Sox already, a lot of people on this very board were jumping down Murph's throat for not talking about the Sox enough. The Sox didn't seem too "Second banannaish" when most were passionately ripping Murph a new one.

And how about the famous Danny Mac thread. Some were ripping into him for missing the day after the clincher, because they called it the biggest day in Chicago Sports in the last 20 years. And if it wasn't for the '85 Bears, it would've been the biggest event in Chicago Sports History period!
Heck, it even compelled Mac to finally sign in(for a change) and make his "first" official post. (Not counting his numerous "Guest" postings)

Anyways, NOBODY plays "second bananna" to ANYBODY considering all of those circumstances.


Average attendance at a Cubs game: 40,000.
Average attendance at a Sox game: 20,000. (during a World Series year!) This math thing is really very easy. It's the same with radio: WGN got huge ratings with the Cubs - WMVP got almost nothing with the Sox - that's why they bailed on the deal and let WSCR have it. What other hard cold facts do you need?


You're right on this: numbers can be "cold hard facts". However, your cold hard facts don't support September and October. So what, they averaged less over the course of an entire season than the Cubs, but as in most towns (except Atlanta), when the playoffs come around all sorts of fans you didn't know you had start popping up. Did you see the Cell during ALL of the playoff series? It was like Yankee Stadium. I know for a fact is wasn't easy getting a ticket.

I love the people on this board that like to break out the "Radio 101" text book and try to tell us all the fundamentals of the business like they know what the hell they're talking about. The Sox being second place to the Cubs means nothing when the postseason rolls around. Most people got caught up this year toward the end of the season, Sox fan or not.

The bottom line is, most sports fans in September and October (which is where this latest trend is coming from) were likley listening to the Sox, not the Score, when they were in their car. Not to mention those people at home that were watching on TV and wanted the hometown call. Again, sports fans have two choices in this city, and I'm not sure what kind of Chicago sports fan you are if during this stretch run and especially the playoffs you weren't listening to the games when you weren't in postition to watch them. That's what most sports fans did in Chicago and that's why the score didn't gain any listeners because the nightime was so lopsided.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 2:31 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 1:51 am
Posts: 377
Location: Springfield, ??
Keeping Score wrote:
Quote:
Maybe you miss the point, there is NO GROWTH IN THE RATINGS.


Maybe YOU miss the point. Are they (670) really going to GROW when the SOX are at the PEAK of their DREAM SEASON? When's the last time this World Series thing went down in Chicago, like 1000 B.C.?
(that would be Before Christ for you slow ones)

And knowing how proprietary Chicago fans are, God only knows how many more people switched to the radio broadcast to avoid the national television product.


Funny that you make those points when you have stated numerous times that it wasn't a big deal that North was unprofessional by not staying up to see the end of Game 3. If you know that, why didn't your idol North know it. Maybe people listen to Mike and Mike because they watch the sporting events they talk about.

So the way I see it...his shows ratings are like life. You only get out, what you put in.

_________________
Homer: "Asleep at the switch"? I wasn't asleep, I was drunk!
Bart: I believe you, Dad.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 10:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 10:02 pm
Posts: 121
Anonymous wrote:
Factually speaking the White Sox averaged 31,000 this past year


Thank you. I thought 20k was too low.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group