Curious Hair wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Quote:
“People support publications that align with our values right now,” Weissman said, and Slate “has positioned itself in front of its readers and the public as part of the resistance.”
These fucking people.
Is he wrong that a publication shouldn't position itself as a voice of the #resistance while embracing "right to work"? Isn't it hard to have it both ways here?
We are a part of "the resistance"? First of all if you have an journalistic integrity you do not announce that you have joined a political movement. Secondly, Slate is a mountain of terrible ideas pandering in the worst of identity politics. If it goes away you can read Vox of Huff Post without skipping a beat.
Back to the resistance and the Right to Work. Rich people forming a club, and going on strike from jobs they don't need is not making any type of political statement. These are people who gleefully abandoned the working class as a part of the Democratic Party. Now they want to have a play strike to show how much of a part of the Resistance they are? Go away.
_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.