This column is brutal. Here is a copy of the e-mail I sent to Mr. Kass:
=========
Dear Mr. Kass,
I read your January 10, 2007 column regarding Mike North and the naming of the Senn High School ball field, and I felt compelled to send you a note. While you used Mr. North's plight to shed light on probable political motivations, your column appears to minimize Mike North's culpability in this matter. The incident you refer to was indeed offensive, but that is not the entire story here.
During his Chicago broadcast career, Mr. North has offered numerous ethnic slurs and offended many with these types of 'unknowing' characterizations. Further, after saying these 'stupid things', Mr. North's initial reaction has been consistently to reject the notion that his comments could be construed as offensive. Mr. North followed this same pattern with respect to incident you describe in your column, but reversed course several days later in response to management pressure. Only then did Mr. North read a stilted, insincere, and qualified apology that was diminished further by his claim he did not know his terminology was offensive. Since that time, he and his co-workers have made light of the apology, further diminishing its value, by making sarcastic reference to other things he did not know were wrong.
My point here is that in my view, Mr. North is not role model; and in light of his transgressions, he truly is not worthy of the honor of having a community field named after him. Sometimes, even when politics is involved, there are legitimate reasons for a course of action. In this case, given the weight of Mr. North's pattern of unbecoming conduct, you ignored the obvious to highlight a lesser point. (Note, the real story here is how was Mr. North selected for this honor in the first place!)
As a final note, Mr. Kass, you conclude your column by noting that you know who loses here -- 'the kids.' I am wondering if you can elaborate on how actually the 'kids' lose if the field is not in fact named after Mike North? Has he committed to some type of guaranteed, continuing financial support to assure future field maintenance and repair? Or are you simply concerned that not naming the field after Mr. North would conceal the message that "It is OK to drop out of school, because you still could get lucky?" (A message that Mike North himself would reject as the 'pussification of America,' but that is another story for another day!)
Thank you in advance for your time and your reply.
|