Let he who is without sin delete the first post.

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.

ok, ok, my take....JORR's censorship isn’t so much about freedom of speech in a revolutionary sense—it’s about the subtle trimming of rough edges to keep brunch vibes undisturbed. Look at it through the lens of curated content. Nobody wants chaos in their feed. They want espresso shots of information—clean, ethical, aesthetically pleasing. A banned book? Sure, but only if it looks good on the coffee table next to the Kinfolk magazine and the candle that smells like “Mountain Air & White Privilege.” To him censorship isn't Orwellian—it’s just the algorithm doing its job. Keeping things “on brand.” After all, nobody wants to see dissent when you're sipping oat milk and planning your next sustainable getaway.

He's not against free speech. It’s just… could it come with better fonts and less confrontation?

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

Most people who claim to love Jesus would hate him and label him a socialist if they actually met him.

Socialists always say this, and it's utterly ignorant.

Jesus didn't tell anyone to involuntarily give their money to a criminal organization so that they could give 10% of it to the poor. Tax collectors were often used in Biblical metaphors as the corrupt party.

Jesus said to give to the poor. And no one is stopping anyone from doing that.

Equating voluntarily giving your wealth to those in need with socialism incoherent.

Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.

Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.

What was His position on retaliatory tariffs?

I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?

He should do it more often.

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

HOLD UP! That's my thing.

The other thing I can't stop watching are those bing bong videos. New York seems like a fun time.

I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?

I can't stop watching that...which then leads to videos of lancing cow abscesses.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

You guys are gross. Loving cow abscesses = sticking your dick in a bunghole.

Admit you're abscess loving assfuckers.

Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.

HOLD UP! That's my thing.

The forbidden cottage cheese. That stuff is nasty. Not fetotomy nasty but nasty nonetheless.

No. I think it just goes directly in the ass.

I didn't hate the pope but I didn't like him. I think many of his views are progressive that are or could have a fundamental if not existential effect on the Catholic Church itself. He has also surrounded himself with some pretty awful people such as McCarrick and another whose name I can 't remember, that guy who embezzled money, and Fernandez who has some pretty odd views and I don't believe it's all coincidental. And as CH just said his heart was in the right place...maybe (I'm not so sure that is the case) but let's say that it was...the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Whether this is deliberate or not doesn't matter if the end result is negative.

I think many who profess their love of Jesus would love him very much if he returned provided they had a clear understanding of Jesus and believe in him. There is a second part to the parable of the adulterous woman that people seem to forget. There is much more to the golden rule and loving thy neighbor as stated and interpreted. While Catholics are called to forgive, and seek non retaliatory non personal means of justice, we are also expected to seek and spread truth and justice. We do not have to accept abuse and we are suppose to protect and care for the weak. Jesus ain't no progressive liberal and I'm not sure it's the job of the Catholic Church to be inclusive in the ways modern society wants it to be.

Is he hitting preview instead of submit? And then just closing out?

Sounds like when Spaulding escapes the misery of whatever affluent Chicago suburb she drinks wine in, she won’t find happiness in Vatican City. Shame, great vintages in St. Peter’s Square.

The Catholic Church doesn't usually condemn people publicly.

The leave that up to you, and The Doctor of Style.

I responded to this post by Crest and by golly, it disappeared also among a couple of others. Could it be that someone only wants his opinion to be seen? Wonder why? I like a good debate on topical things. Seeing another's opinion and debating things make life interesting, does it not? Unfortunately your options get limited when part of the discussion gets removed.

I don't care for the cheap shot that Crest took at me and further pissed me off with the comment about condemning people. In a related post which also got erased, I told Crest that I have had a solid Catholic education and know that some of his statements regarding church doctrine was not true.

It was a statement of fact, not a cheap shot.

Below is a good example of it. There is not a single judgement in the post that is factually correct. You, and millions of others in the US should get a refund for the Catholic "education" that you received.

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

Opus DEI

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

Then Vatican and Rome look beautiful as always

I don’t know what savages are clapping at a funeral. Don’t clap for me when you attend mine

Love, as understood by humans, is overrated. I'm not arguing it's not the best of emotions and can cure many ails, but it is not the answer for peace and harmony...not in this world. What I saw from the pope was lazy love. Live and let live love. Undisciplined love.

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.