Martin wrote:
Why do I get the feeling that many of the posters here who can't stand him, yet would regularly listen to his morning show anyways, are going to step right up and listen to his NorthtoNorth.com webcast?
And then afterwards, they will come here, and talk about it being a trainwreck, that he is a horrible person and they are glad he is off the Score. Then when he has his second webcast, those same people are going to listen again... and again, and again.
If Mike North had serious offers that truly appealed to him, then why is he doing an Internet show?
Same thing to the listeners of North's interviews: there to listen to the lies and decry them. I listened to yesterday's MJH interview; I was interested in seeing how the architect of a several-year train wreck explained himself.
Actually, I have a take on it. To North's mind, the MNMS (and through extension, solo midday and Wiseguy afternoon) shows were successful because they got him out there, in the form of the latter show, it got him to doing non-sports stuff for awhile, and it allowed him to prove he can carry a show solo. All the while, making 1.5M, not getting suspended, not getting fired.That's successful to him. As to what the show is/was, that's a matter of contention, but he didn't get fired doing it, so it was good enough. What more is there?
(Aside: I don't completely agree with the POV, as I take betterment of the the station's position & my team mates to be of higher import. (Or since I'm not a radio guy, my place of employment.) But I'm aware of many, many "me, me, me" people out there, and he's one of them. People who pursue own agendas as opposed to lining theirs up with that of the company. If the company goes belly-up, gee that's too bad, but the company was there to pay them salary while they step up the ladder, and it dies when it dies...)
As to Jiggs, he was there to team with North long enough for people to get the idea that he can carry the show solo. Whilst doing that, Jiggs got the benefit of valuable employment. Mike appreciates the benefit of Jiggs as someone who legitimized North to the point where folks thought he could do a solid act. Hence, this stupid comment yesterday about the "Jiggs temple; I appreciate what he done for me; he better have a temple for me for all I did for him"...
(I guess Annie couldn't carry him anywhere, vis-a-vis legitimizing his ability to argue politics. In turn, he couldn't carry her as a legit pol commentator, either. No temples for Annie.)
Streaming internet: why not? That's "current-y". Put on the resume, next to "talks other subjects than sports" and "solo hosted morning show for x years without getting fired".
Can you spot lies, glossing-overs, misrepresentations? You're probably grounded in there here-and-now. Engaging in arguments with your type brings him down the ground level, and away from the up, up, up POV he has.
And that is my book report from yesterday's fun. A streaming internet show with fritzi, knuckles, bebe and the dog doesn't seem worth it. I heard his morning show before, and I had the chance to figure out this POV theory. I got what I needed out of him.