Gooch - I could not agree with you more on your point about North making a completely "shite" analogy - he seems to have no concept of real world events, politics, geography, or really just plain facts. However, I could not disagree with you more in terms of comparing the death tolls in Somalia to that of Iraq . . . to say you are comparing apples to oranges would be an understatement.
Truth be told, the fact that even one soldier died in the "Black Hawk Down" event is one of the worst examples of military management by a President in modern history. The fact that they died is horrible enough, but the scene of that muslim-extremist scum dragging our soldiers' bodies through their un-paved streets to this day brings huge amounts of bile to the tip of my tongue.
I'm not going to try and make this a pro-Bush, pro-Iraq war thread, and I don't think you were trying to do the opposite, but saying anything positive about Bill Clinton's use of the military (sans, MAYBE, Serbia/Kosovo) is a non-starter in my book.
Gooch wrote:
This has to be the stupidest thing Ive ever heard him say. He says it happens to all presidents that they get involved in conflict without enough
troops or an exit strategy so that the same thing happening to Bush in Iraq is exactly the same as Clinton in the black hawk down events. Unfortunately 2000 plus of our guys and counting are dying in Iraq while Somalia was a handful of troops. If you're going to defend Bush at least make an analogy that isnt complete shite