Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So you wouldn't take drugs for one year to make 10 million dollars and know that your grandchildrens financial future is secure?
I don't think it's that simple, BR. If I could just simply take drugs for "a year" to make 10 million that's one thing, but it doens't really work like that does it? Keep your strawman, not interested.
Mac wrote:
I'm not desperate, Darkside... I'm being honest. If you watch the NFL (my favorite pro sport by a mile) on a big screen.... it's obvious steroids and other performance enhancing drugs are a part of the game. Good nutrition and the weight room don't produce THOSE results alone.
I love the BIG SCREEN comment, well done. No, I watch on a 36 inch Sanyo. Maybe I'll understand better when I save up enough for that 60 inch 1080p jobber. I could use the Credit card but I hate debt.
One, dude, I doubt you really believe that. Not that I haven't heard you say that before, but come one man. You think they SHOULD allow it in the NFL? you think they should encourage people taking steroids that is KNOWN to have serious long term health effects so we can be entertained by bulkier bodies? That's ridiculous. Football is hard enough on the body as it is, former football player die younger than other pro athletes already.
If your life is nutrition and working out, you can achieve the results you see on some of these players. Some are enhanced to be sure, but legalizing will cost some lives. Entertainment ain't worth that.
frank wrote:
You could easily say the same thing about those who smoke pot and booze to excess on occasion
You sure could say that. If you were a simpleton.
Drinking to excess
on occasion has no negative health effects, at least in terms of dying young and or in a rage leaving dead family members behind. Unless of course you're mental to begin with and you drunk rage but then the underlying mental problems would be the root cause wouldn't they?
And weed, dude, I don't think that people are dying young because of weed. Your argument is silly to me.
syanky wrote:
Holy crap. Best post in the thread. I............agree [with Franks post quoted above].
That's because you don't know what you're talking about either.
I believe everything I'm told in the media Spanky wrote:
Excessive alocohol or smoking pot ain't good for you.
Perhaps alcohol, but pot ain't gonna hurt you unless you smoke an ounce a day for 60 years. Excessive use of pot is nearly impossible. It would also be unrelated to the actual topic we were trying to discuss, whether Mac's claim that he would encourage use of steroids in sports is genuine, or just a strong opinion voiced for the purpose of getting posters and the lsiteners riled up. We should also mention Mac's big screen(s) again. high def big screens that is.
Frank's Morality wrote:
So, if somebody is going to get all high and mighty about players jeopardizing thier family's future by doing steriods, they need to look in the mirror.
Once again, there is SIGNIFICANT degree of difference between taking steroids long enought to get big, get the job, stay good long enough to get that big contract is different from smoking some pot on weekends. You don't take steroids for "a year to get the big contract". contracts are payment in the future for achievements in the past. You need to be roided for a little longer than a year.
_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.