Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic - 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool

How many times have they used the word "whore?"

How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"?

Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now.

Tad Queasy wrote:

How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"?

Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now.

The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

Tad Queasy wrote:

How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"?

Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now.

The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant.

Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

Tad Queasy wrote:

How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"?

Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now.

The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant.

Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

Tad Queasy wrote:

How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"?

Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now.

The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant.

Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now.

pittmike wrote:

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

Tad Queasy wrote:

How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"?

Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now.

The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant.

Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now.

Founder called Sam Ponder a slut and Caller Bob a few years ago. She brought it back up the day before the show aired. Founder said he wished he didn't call her a Caller Bob but doesn't take back the sentiment.

Terry's Peeps wrote:

pittmike wrote:

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

Tad Queasy wrote:

How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"?

Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now.

The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant.

Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now.

"In hindsight I wish I just called her a jerk so she couldn’t use this against us, but it’s vintage Barstool and that’s the problem we’re running into it. ".

The "so she couldn't use this against us" makes it seems like he doesn't think it was a problem besides getting caught.

So he said this stuff a few years ago and Espn still hired barstool knowing that was out there ?

Banging the QB at FSU and working college football games? I mean is the guy wrong in his assessment?

Urlacher's missing neck wrote:

Banging the QB at FSU and working college football games? I mean is the guy wrong in his assessment?

Terry Boers called Cheryl Scott a "pin cushion" (That's the 1950s word for slut) and there was no outrage from SCORE people. Larry didn't get mad even though he claimed that Cheryl was like a sister to him.

Tad Queasy wrote:

Is she a slut?

Sam Ponder I'm not sure, but Sarah Spain is.

Author:	Tad Queasy [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:05 am ]
Post subject:	10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Started at about 11:00. Parkins seems to like them, or at least a good part of what they do.

Author:	Terry's Peeps [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:11 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Probably about as productive as us discussing Julie DiCaro.

Author:	Tad Queasy [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:18 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"? Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now.

Author:	KDdidit [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:19 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
How many times have they used the word "whore?"

Author:	Terry's Peeps [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:25 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
KDdidit wrote: How many times have they used the word "whore?" 83!

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=109167	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Brick [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:26 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Tad Queasy wrote: How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"? Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now. The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant.

Author:	pittmike [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:29 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"? Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now. The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant. Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now.

Author:	rogers park bryan [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:33 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
pittmike wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"? Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now. The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant. Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now. Called ESPN reporter a slut, refused to apologize even when ESPN brought them on.

Author:	Brick [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:37 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
pittmike wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"? Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now. The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant. Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now. The guy who started Barstool has a long history of saying dumb stuff about women at ESPN. He said something about Sam Ponder and she complained on twitter about it(though she thought that Big Cat did). He then wrote a long rant post that only said "I wish I had said jerk simply because this was hurting us" instead of just apologizing for it being out of line. He then pretty much acted like a dbag for a few days while also outing a hypocrite from another site on things he said. ESPN decided that a guy who literally is the face of Barstool couldn't be doing this while a Barstool branded show was on their airwaves.

Author:	Brick [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:39 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Terry's Peeps wrote: pittmike wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"? Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now. The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant. Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now. Founder called Sam Ponder a slut and Caller Bob a few years ago. She brought it back up the day before the show aired. Founder said he wished he didn't call her a Caller Bob but doesn't take back the sentiment. "In hindsight I wish I just called her a jerk so she couldn’t use this against us, but it’s vintage Barstool and that’s the problem we’re running into it. ". The "so she couldn't use this against us" makes it seems like he doesn't think it was a problem besides getting caught.

Author:	Tad Queasy [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:56 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Is she a slut?

Author:	badrogue17 [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:59 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: pittmike wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: How is Barstool any different than WSCR was before it "evolved"? Spiegel kind of brought that up now, saying they've all said things in the past that would not look good now. The difference is that the guy who started the site wasn't willing to admit it was a mistake and even doubled down on it. He really screwed over the two guys that made his site relevant. Can someone whiteboard this? This is two threads where I am confused now. Founder called Sam Ponder a slut and Caller Bob a few years ago. She brought it back up the day before the show aired. Founder said he wished he didn't call her a Caller Bob but doesn't take back the sentiment. "In hindsight I wish I just called her a jerk so she couldn’t use this against us, but it’s vintage Barstool and that’s the problem we’re running into it. ". The "so she couldn't use this against us" makes it seems like he doesn't think it was a problem besides getting caught. So he said this stuff a few years ago and Espn still hired barstool knowing that was out there ?

Author:	Brick [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
badrogue17 wrote: So he said this stuff a few years ago and Espn still hired barstool knowing that was out there ? Well, they may not have known but Sam Ponder clearly remembered and he confirmed it. However, if he had just said that it was wrong to do and that he apologized the show is probably still going.

Author:	Urlacher's missing neck [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Banging the QB at FSU and working college football games? I mean is the guy wrong in his assessment?

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Beardown [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:00 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Urlacher's missing neck wrote: Banging the QB at FSU and working college football games? I mean is the guy wrong in his assessment? Terry Boers called Cheryl Scott a "pin cushion" (That's the 1950s word for slut) and there was no outrage from SCORE people. Larry didn't get mad even though he claimed that Cheryl was like a sister to him.

Author:	SuperNintendoHjalmarsson [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
he sure spent some valuable hallway time thinking about it though.

Author:	Baby McNown [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 4:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Tad Queasy wrote: Is she a slut? Sam Ponder I'm not sure, but Sarah Spain is.

Author:	312player [ Tue Oct 24, 2017 5:27 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Beardown wrote: Urlacher's missing neck wrote: Banging the QB at FSU and working college football games? I mean is the guy wrong in his assessment? Terry Boers called Cheryl Scott a "pin cushion" (That's the 1950s word for slut) and there was no outrage from SCORE people. Larry didn't get mad even though he claimed that Cheryl was like a sister to him. When Larry says sister, he means a woman who will never. sleep with him.

Author:	Sarge [ Fri Oct 27, 2017 9:16 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Baby McNown wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: Is she a slut? Sam Ponder I'm not sure, but Sarah Spain is. She kind of admits to it here...? https://youtu.be/ynjGm2h_5wY

Author:	pittmike [ Fri Oct 27, 2017 9:21 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Wasn't there a different hot CSN girl that got fired for making dumb videos with her BFF?

Author:	KDdidit [ Fri Oct 27, 2017 9:35 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 10/24: Spiegel and Parkins Discuss Barstool
Susanna Collins from the horribly named "Sports Nutz" videos.