Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic - 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?

No. Gambling is glorious

Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest.

Gambling is relevant as ultimately you are talking about what the expected outcome of the game is and why you think it will or won't be that way. It's a gateway into deep analysis of the game without boring sabermetrics.

donspiracy wrote:

Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest.

NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week.

denisdman wrote:

donspiracy wrote:

Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest.

NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week.

The Masters turns every well-off white sportswriter into an enormous raging shithead. "Even liberals?" Especially liberals!

Now it's just baseball. Nobody gambles on baseball that much. So they will tone that down.

Curious Hair wrote:

denisdman wrote:

donspiracy wrote:

Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest.

NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week.

The Masters turns every well-off white sportswriter into an enormous raging shithead. "Even liberals?" Especially liberals!

First it was the blacks. Now you are attacking the whites.

Is there anyone you won't slander?!

Kirkwood wrote:

No. Gambling is glorious

Inadvertent period.

No gambling is glorious.

denisdman wrote:

donspiracy wrote:

Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest.

NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week.

The Masters turns every well-off white sportswriter into an enormous raging shithead. "Even liberals?" Especially liberals!

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Kirkwood wrote:

No. Gambling is glorious

Inadvertent period.

No gambling is glorious.

You guys that don't like gambling posts are all racist bigots. Get the hell out of here.

I like my own gambling.

I don't care about your gambling.

Caller Bob wrote:

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Kirkwood wrote:

No. Gambling is glorious

Inadvertent period.

No gambling is glorious.

You guys that don't like gambling posts are all racist bigots. Get the hell out of here.

I like my own gambling.

I don't care about your gambling.

Shouted out to the board again today during the segment on the Twitter/Is it newsworthy segment.

Curious Hair wrote:

denisdman wrote:

donspiracy wrote:

Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest.

NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week.

The Masters turns every well-off white sportswriter into an enormous raging shithead. "Even liberals?" Especially liberals!

The only event that group maaaaybe gets more excited about is a Bruce Springsteen concert.

For the shit Mac gets for not caring about certain sports, it sure seems Parkins may suffer from the same thing if he didn't put action on games to get him to watch.

KDdidit wrote:

For the shit Mac gets for not caring about certain sports, it sure seems Parkins may suffer from the same thing if he didn't put action on games to get him to watch.

I wouldn't watch half the sports I watch if I didn't gamble on it. Maybe more.

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Kirkwood wrote:

No. Gambling is glorious

Inadvertent period.

No gambling is glorious.

You guys that don't like gambling posts are all racist bigots. Get the hell out of here.

Author:	Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 11:57 am ]
Post subject:	4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
College basketball is over, so that excuse for the incessant gambling talk on this show will no longer suffice. Even yesterday, Parkins asked Len Kasper if he should bet the under because of the weather in Cincinnati. Stop. Talking. About. Gambling. So. Much. Freaking degenerates.

Author:	denisdman [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:00 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Gambling is mostly about predicting scores and winners/losers, so it is not far afield from the actual games. Gambling chatter fits in nicely with talking about sports. In your example, Parkins is essentially asking how the weather will factor into the outcome of the game.

Author:	Kirkwood [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:01 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
No. Gambling is glorious

Author:	Ogie Oglethorpe [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
They should talk about gambling as those who took their advice would've made bank. They had the 2 National Championship contenders. Gambling is relevant as ultimately you are talking about what the expected outcome of the game is and why you think it will or won't be that way. It's a gateway into deep analysis of the game without boring sabermetrics.

Author:	Terry's Peeps [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Kirkwood wrote: No. Gambling is glorious Inadvertent period. No gambling is glorious.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

4/3: How will they talk about gambling today? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=111782	Page 1 of 2

Author:	Brick [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:08 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Keep clutching those pearls JLN!

Author:	KDdidit [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
I've said before that I enjoy shows when they have Vegas "insiders" on talking about what they see and and how Vegas thinks. You're giving Parkins and Mac too much credit that their gambling content is in any way insightful. It's usually nothing but meatball gambling talk. For the shit Mac gets for not caring about certain sports, it sure seems Parkins may suffer from the same thing if he didn't put action on games to get him to watch.

Author:	GoldenJet [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
JLN's obsession with Mac&P's gambling talk is worse than Mac's obsession with people who switch seats at games.

Author:	donspiracy [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest. Odds to win Stanley Cup or NBA Finals. Kentucky Derby is in a month. The show pot is blooming, no way they stop this train.

Author:	denisdman [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:20 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
donspiracy wrote: Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest. NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week.

Author:	Jaw Breaker [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:29 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: Gambling is relevant as ultimately you are talking about what the expected outcome of the game is and why you think it will or won't be that way. It's a gateway into deep analysis of the game without boring sabermetrics. Yes, it's kind of like the argument of fundamental analysis vs technical analysis in guessing the direction of the stock market or other events. You can study the scientific fundamentals to try to figure out when Old Faithful will erupt next or you can simply observe when it does and use the historical patterns to predict the future. Some people swear by the former and insist it's the only way to truly understand what is happening, but the latter can be just as accurate in many cases.

Author:	Curious Hair [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:31 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
denisdman wrote: donspiracy wrote: Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest. NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week. The Masters turns every well-off white sportswriter into an enormous raging shithead. "Even liberals?" Especially liberals!

Author:	Beardown [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:33 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Gambling talk is fine. It was the NCAA tourney. So it was appropriate. Now it's just baseball. Nobody gambles on baseball that much. So they will tone that down. I want more HOOKERS and DRUGS talk.

Author:	Brick [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:35 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Also, you have to enjoy JLN complaining about too much talking about a specific topic.

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Jaw Breaker [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Beardown wrote: Now it's just baseball. Nobody gambles on baseball that much. So they will tone that down. I've bet on every Cubs game so far...they've been heavy favorites in each one

Author:	denisdman [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Terry's Peeps wrote: Curious Hair wrote: denisdman wrote: donspiracy wrote: Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest. NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week. The Masters turns every well-off white sportswriter into an enormous raging shithead. "Even liberals?" Especially liberals! First it was the blacks. Now you are attacking the whites. Is there anyone you won't slander?! Well, it rhymes with slanders....

Author:	Caller Bob [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Terry's Peeps wrote: Kirkwood wrote: No. Gambling is glorious Inadvertent period. No gambling is glorious. You guys that don't like gambling posts are all racist bigots. Get the hell out of here.

Author:	sjboyd0137 [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Gambling > Fantasy Sports > SJW Radio

Author:	Kirkwood [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Curious Hair wrote: denisdman wrote: donspiracy wrote: Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest. NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week. The Masters turns every well-off white sportswriter into an enormous raging shithead. "Even liberals?" Especially liberals! The only event that group maaaaybe gets more excited about is a Bruce Springsteen concert.

Author:	Terry's Peeps [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:04 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Caller Bob wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Kirkwood wrote: No. Gambling is glorious Inadvertent period. No gambling is glorious. You guys that don't like gambling posts are all racist bigots. Get the hell out of here. I like my own gambling. I don't care about your gambling.

Author:	denisdman [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:09 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Terry's Peeps wrote: I like my own gambling. I don't care about your gambling. I'd agree if we're talking about someone else's fantasy team. But I enjoy hearing about great covers or just miss parlays. Plus much of the chatter is prospective, so they are just laying money on the outcome of a game that most of us care about.

Author:	Daniel Plainview [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Terry's Peeps wrote: Caller Bob wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Kirkwood wrote: No. Gambling is glorious Inadvertent period. No gambling is glorious. You guys that don't like gambling posts are all racist bigots. Get the hell out of here. I like my own gambling. I don't care about your gambling. Exactly. Listening to someone else talk about gambling is just plain boring. Immediate zone out time.

Author:	pittmike [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 2:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Shouted out to the board again today during the segment on the Twitter/Is it newsworthy segment.

Author:	beni hanna [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
pittmike wrote: Shouted out to the board again today during the segment on the Twitter/Is it newsworthy segment. This is always well and good, and the pub helps invigorate the bored and the Wisemen's pockets and whatnot...so it's all good. I would love to eavesdrop on the noob that fires up the google machine and locates this place for the first time. I wish all were as gung ho as my guy Lipidquadcab/Home5licE was when he first posted on the Bikerboard way back when.

Author:	Tad Queasy [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 2:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Shepkowski doesn't believe people when they say DePaul used to be a huge story in Chicago.

Author:	Curious Hair [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 3:17 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Kirkwood wrote: Curious Hair wrote: denisdman wrote: donspiracy wrote: Masters wagers. Is Tiger worth laying down some sawbucks for?? Maybe they put Rozner on as a segment guest. NO!!!!! He is more insufferable than normal during Master's week. The Masters turns every well-off white sportswriter into an enormous raging shithead. "Even liberals?" Especially liberals! The only event that group maaaaybe gets more excited about is a Bruce Springsteen concert. If a Springsteen concert served that most perfect delicacy, the pimiento sandwich, they'd be set.

Author:	McDude [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:34 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
KDdidit wrote: For the shit Mac gets for not caring about certain sports, it sure seems Parkins may suffer from the same thing if he didn't put action on games to get him to watch. I wouldn't watch half the sports I watch if I didn't gamble on it. Maybe more.

Author:	Dreadnaught847 [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:40 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
McDude wrote: KDdidit wrote: For the shit Mac gets for not caring about certain sports, it sure seems Parkins may suffer from the same thing if he didn't put action on games to get him to watch. I wouldn't watch half the sports I watch if I didn't gamble on it. Maybe more. Besides the Sox and Bears if I didn’t gamble I’d barely watch any of the other sports

Author:	long time guy [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/3: How will they talk about gambling today?
Caller Bob wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Kirkwood wrote: No. Gambling is glorious Inadvertent period. No gambling is glorious. You guys that don't like gambling posts are all racist bigots. Get the hell out of here. Big Tent Politically!