Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

5/23 Goff is still salty
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=112479
Page 1 of 6

Author:  FavreFan [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:29 pm ]
Post subject:  5/23 Goff is still salty


Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:

Author:  denisdman [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:


Fighting the good fight. It's not binary. Most of us are dead set against police brutality and racial injustice. But with that presumably large group, MANY feel protesting during the anthem is bad form.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

So the best metric to host a show is if you are likely to face police brutality. Let's fine the best hosts on the cell block!

Author:  Kirkwood [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

goff hate listening! :lol:

Author:  ZephMarshack [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

denisdman wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:


Fighting the good fight. It's not binary. Most of us are dead set against police brutality and racial injustice. But with that presumably large group, MANY feel protesting during the anthem is bad form.

MANY feel protesting before the anthem is played is bad form. MANY seem to feel protesting at all is bad form.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:

Discussions that start with if you’re this , that makes you ________ usually end well.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Quote:
Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
Great Show Today.
6:02 PM · May 23, 2018

Author:  Tad Queasy [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Parkins: I know people are sick of the anthem talk, but I just have to say...

Author:  denisdman [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

ZephMarshack wrote:
denisdman wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:


Fighting the good fight. It's not binary. Most of us are dead set against police brutality and racial injustice. But with that presumably large group, MANY feel protesting during the anthem is bad form.

MANY feel protesting before the anthem is played is bad form. MANY seem to feel protesting at all is bad form.


Well, those are folks against the American ideal. And we have plenty of folks on both sides that like to muzzle speech with which they disagree.

Personally, I just think the people protesting during the anthem are turning off more people than they are inspiring. But at least they are getting people to talk about their cause, so there's that.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:


You were listening. Great show today.

Author:  Hatchetman [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

already burnt all the bridges might as well burn the row boats too.

Author:  DAC [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018




Jason- You can always choose not to listen. Just like many of us did to your abomination of a show which is why you're on Twitter and not the air waves.

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

DAC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018




Jason- You can always choose not to listen. Just like many of us did to your abomination of a show which is why you're on Twitter and not the air waves.

FAKE NEWS . He has tons of offers coming n . Just ask him.

Author:  beni hanna [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Hatchetman wrote:
already burnt all the bridges might as well burn the row boats too.


At this point is there any reason Goff should not be a regular poster at the good ol CFMB?

Author:  Rod [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

ZephMarshack wrote:
denisdman wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:


Fighting the good fight. It's not binary. Most of us are dead set against police brutality and racial injustice. But with that presumably large group, MANY feel protesting during the anthem is bad form.

MANY feel protesting before the anthem is played is bad form. MANY seem to feel protesting at all is bad form.



Really? Where is your evidence of that?

Personally, I don't give a fuck if they kneel during the anthem or wipe their asses with the American flag on TV, but what Goff says is simply wrong. A person can very well be against racial injustice/police brutality and against kneeling during the anthem at the same time. That isn't really difficult to understand.

Author:  SpiralStairs [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.


I believe this is the chart you are looking for.

Image

Author:  ZephMarshack [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
denisdman wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:


Fighting the good fight. It's not binary. Most of us are dead set against police brutality and racial injustice. But with that presumably large group, MANY feel protesting during the anthem is bad form.

MANY feel protesting before the anthem is played is bad form. MANY seem to feel protesting at all is bad form.



Really? Where is your evidence of that?

Personally, I don't give a fuck if they kneel during the anthem or wipe their asses with the American flag on TV, but what Goff says is simply wrong. A person can very well be against racial injustice/police brutality and against kneeling during the anthem at the same time. That isn't really difficult to understand.

The fact that players and teams who purposefully knelt only before the anthem were still widely booed indicates to me that for MANY this has never been strictly about respect during the anthem but the audacity to express any kind of opinion at all.

Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Wed May 23, 2018 1:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Well this show thread is off to a rolling start

Author:  FavreFan [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Well this show thread is off to a rolling start

I know what moves meters around here.

Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

FavreFan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Well this show thread is off to a rolling start

I know what moves meters around here.

and that meter has moved, but souls weren't

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

ZephMarshack wrote:
The fact that players and teams who purposefully knelt only before the anthem were still widely booed indicates to me that for MANY this has never been strictly about respect during the anthem but the audacity to express any kind of opinion at all.
So your evidence is a few boos that you arbitrarily hear thru your TV?

I hope you realize that it is least plausible- if not likely- that some of those boos are directed at the player(s) simply because he is not wearing the uniform of the home team.

Author:  ZephMarshack [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Frank Coztansa wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
The fact that players and teams who purposefully knelt only before the anthem were still widely booed indicates to me that for MANY this has never been strictly about respect during the anthem but the audacity to express any kind of opinion at all.
So your evidence is a few boos that you arbitrarily hear thru your TV? It is also possible that some of those boos are directed at the player(s) simply because he is not wearing the uniform of the home team.

The Ravens, Jaguars, and Cowboys were all widely booed by their home fans when they took knees before the anthem. This wasn't just my subjective opinion, it was widely reported on. But you're right, maybe it was the visiting fans booing them!

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Then based on what you said earlier, you believe that everybody who booed in Jacksonville, Baltimore, and Dallas is against any protest at all at any time or any where.

Nobody is gonna buy that, so don't try selling it.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
TIL saying "black people constitute a higher percentage of the prison population than the at-large population because they commit more crimes" is a bigoted statement.

Are you open to the possibility that it may be a little more complex than that?


The statement isn't concerned with the "why" of the criminal behavior. Unless you are prepared to argue that there are a HUGE amount of false convictions, the statement is true and is not in need of further context.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
denisdman wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:


Fighting the good fight. It's not binary. Most of us are dead set against police brutality and racial injustice. But with that presumably large group, MANY feel protesting during the anthem is bad form.

MANY feel protesting before the anthem is played is bad form. MANY seem to feel protesting at all is bad form.



Really? Where is your evidence of that?

Personally, I don't give a fuck if they kneel during the anthem or wipe their asses with the American flag on TV, but what Goff says is simply wrong. A person can very well be against racial injustice/police brutality and against kneeling during the anthem at the same time. That isn't really difficult to understand.

Agreed. It would be like saying if you think Jane Fonda spitting in veterans faces was wrong, you support the Vietnam war.


There are definitely people that think protesting of any kind is wrong. A guy I work with calls em "troublemakers"

Author:  ZephMarshack [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Then based on what you said earlier, you believe that everybody who booed in Jacksonville, Baltimore, and Dallas is against any protest at all at any time or any where.

Nobody is gonna buy that, so don't try selling it.

My view of their being against a protest any time anywhere wasn't entirely derived from that, but I think it's definitely circumstantial evidence IMO. And of course it's direct evidence that this wasn't strictly about the flag or anthem for MANY of the booers.

I'll happily amend my statement though and say the people who booed even when those players did end up standing for the anthem are not opposed to all protests, but only those that they happen to be exposed to. They're likely totally in favor of all protests that are totally out of sight and out of mind.

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
TIL saying "black people constitute a higher percentage of the prison population than the at-large population because they commit more crimes" is a bigoted statement.

Are you open to the possibility that it may be a little more complex than that?


The statement isn't concerned with the "why" of the criminal behavior. Unless you are prepared to argue that there are a HUGE amount of false convictions, the statement is true and is not in need of further context.


What exactly do you think is the logical inconsistency here?

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

ZephMarshack wrote:
And of course it's direct evidence that this wasn't strictly about the flag or anthem for MANY of the booers.
You don't know this to be true.

ZephMarshack wrote:
They're likely totally in favor of all protests that are totally out of sight and out of mind.
You don't know this to be true.

Author:  ZephMarshack [ Wed May 23, 2018 2:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 5/23 Goff is still salty

Frank Coztansa wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And of course it's direct evidence that this wasn't strictly about the flag or anthem for MANY of the booers.
You don't know this to be true.
What reason is there to boo the players who are totally respecting the flag and anthem according to the standards of those who talk the most about disrespect for the flag and anthem?

Quote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
They're likely totally in favor of all protests that are totally out of sight and out of mind.
You don't know this to be true.
Agreed, I don't know if they're opposed to all protests in general or just the ones they happen to see. You didn't seem to care for the former takeaway.

Page 1 of 6 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/