Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

I'm going to take Arizona with the points. Not a big move because I still don't think the Cardinals' defense is as good as it's appeared the past month. Delhomme made AZ look better than it really is and the Eagles were, well, the Eagles. I believe Roethlisberger is a bit gimpy and I don't think Ward is as ready as the Steelers say he is.

Leaning toward the over. I know the Steelers defense is excellent, but it's Warner and Fitzgerald (and a fine supporting cast).

I always play a guy from each squad on first player to score a touchdown. Usually, I pick a guy who is a medium to long shot. Hightower could be my Cardinal and I may take Holmes on the other side.

Gonna check and see if there's a prop on 50+ yard field goals. Rackers has the leg and when you couple that with Pittsburgh's ability to made big plays on 3rd down, he may get a chance or two. Longest FG in SB history: Steve Christie, Buffalo, 54-yards. Does that get broken today? Hmmmmm.

Mac wrote:

Do the complete opposite of what Mac's saying and you'll be a winner. :wink:

Slap Shot ED wrote:

Mac wrote:

Do the complete opposite of what Mac's saying and you'll be a winner. :wink:

Mac should start a website called; http://www.dothefuckingoppositeofwhatIdo.com. He'll get rich. Are you kiddin' me?

Author:	BD [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:22 pm ]
Post subject:	Super Bowl Plays
Mac - any leans on the Super Bowl?

Author:	Mac [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:17 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Super Bowl Plays
I'm going to take Arizona with the points. Not a big move because I still don't think the Cardinals' defense is as good as it's appeared the past month. Delhomme made AZ look better than it really is and the Eagles were, well, the Eagles. I believe Roethlisberger is a bit gimpy and I don't think Ward is as ready as the Steelers say he is. Leaning toward the over. I know the Steelers defense is excellent, but it's Warner and Fitzgerald (and a fine supporting cast). I always play a guy from each squad on first player to score a touchdown. Usually, I pick a guy who is a medium to long shot. Hightower could be my Cardinal and I may take Holmes on the other side. Gonna check and see if there's a prop on 50+ yard field goals. Rackers has the leg and when you couple that with Pittsburgh's ability to made big plays on 3rd down, he may get a chance or two. Longest FG in SB history: Steve Christie, Buffalo, 54-yards. Does that get broken today? Hmmmmm.

Author:	Eaglo Jeff [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:02 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Super Bowl Plays
Mac wrote: I'm going to take Arizona with the points. Not a big move because I still don't think the Cardinals' defense is as good as it's appeared the past month. Delhomme made AZ look better than it really is and the Eagles were, well, the Eagles. I believe Roethlisberger is a bit gimpy and I don't think Ward is as ready as the Steelers say he is. Leaning toward the over. I know the Steelers defense is excellent, but it's Warner and Fitzgerald (and a fine supporting cast).. Hey now! What's that supposed to mean about my Eagles Mac? Thanks, I'll be collecting my winnings by taking the Steelers and the under.

Author:	Slap Shot ED [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:08 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Super Bowl Plays
Mac wrote: I'm going to take Arizona with the points. Not a big move because I still don't think the Cardinals' defense is as good as it's appeared the past month. Delhomme made AZ look better than it really is and the Eagles were, well, the Eagles. I believe Roethlisberger is a bit gimpy and I don't think Ward is as ready as the Steelers say he is. Leaning toward the over. I know the Steelers defense is excellent, but it's Warner and Fitzgerald (and a fine supporting cast). I always play a guy from each squad on first player to score a touchdown. Usually, I pick a guy who is a medium to long shot. Hightower could be my Cardinal and I may take Holmes on the other side. Gonna check and see if there's a prop on 50+ yard field goals. Rackers has the leg and when you couple that with Pittsburgh's ability to made big plays on 3rd down, he may get a chance or two. Longest FG in SB history: Steve Christie, Buffalo, 54-yards. Does that get broken today? Hmmmmm. Do the complete opposite of what Mac's saying and you'll be a winner.

Author:	doug - evergreen park [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Super Bowl Plays
i just read this. i also like the Cards to win 29-27....so, do the exact opposite of me too cuz I never win unless Ed or Coast tell me who to put money on.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Super Bowl Plays https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=29192	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Mac [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Super Bowl Plays
Here what I'm rooting for: Cardinals +6.5 1 unit over 46.5 1 unit Warner pass yds over 265 1 unit (-170) Roethlisberger pass yds under 220 1 unit (+135) Hightower to score TD? yes, 1 unit (+160) First to score TD: Holmes 8/1 1 unit; Breaston 10/1 1 unit First sack: A. Wilson 10/1 1 unit Long FG o/u 44.5 over (-125) 2 units Good luck. Enjoy the show. Eat me, Slappy.

Author:	Mr. Reason [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:06 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Super Bowl Plays
Slap Shot ED wrote: Mac wrote: I'm going to take Arizona with the points. Not a big move because I still don't think the Cardinals' defense is as good as it's appeared the past month. Delhomme made AZ look better than it really is and the Eagles were, well, the Eagles. I believe Roethlisberger is a bit gimpy and I don't think Ward is as ready as the Steelers say he is. Leaning toward the over. I know the Steelers defense is excellent, but it's Warner and Fitzgerald (and a fine supporting cast). I always play a guy from each squad on first player to score a touchdown. Usually, I pick a guy who is a medium to long shot. Hightower could be my Cardinal and I may take Holmes on the other side. Gonna check and see if there's a prop on 50+ yard field goals. Rackers has the leg and when you couple that with Pittsburgh's ability to made big plays on 3rd down, he may get a chance or two. Longest FG in SB history: Steve Christie, Buffalo, 54-yards. Does that get broken today? Hmmmmm. Do the complete opposite of what Mac's saying and you'll be a winner. Mac should start a website called; http://www.dothefuckingoppositeofwhatIdo.com. He'll get rich. Are you kiddin' me?

Author:	Eaglo Jeff [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 7:19 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Super Bowl Plays
Mr. Reason wrote: Slap Shot ED wrote: Mac wrote: I'm going to take Arizona with the points. Not a big move because I still don't think the Cardinals' defense is as good as it's appeared the past month. Delhomme made AZ look better than it really is and the Eagles were, well, the Eagles. I believe Roethlisberger is a bit gimpy and I don't think Ward is as ready as the Steelers say he is. Leaning toward the over. I know the Steelers defense is excellent, but it's Warner and Fitzgerald (and a fine supporting cast). I always play a guy from each squad on first player to score a touchdown. Usually, I pick a guy who is a medium to long shot. Hightower could be my Cardinal and I may take Holmes on the other side. Gonna check and see if there's a prop on 50+ yard field goals. Rackers has the leg and when you couple that with Pittsburgh's ability to made big plays on 3rd down, he may get a chance or two. Longest FG in SB history: Steve Christie, Buffalo, 54-yards. Does that get broken today? Hmmmmm. Do the complete opposite of what Mac's saying and you'll be a winner. Mac should start a website called; http://www.dothefuckingoppositeofwhatIdo.com. He'll get rich. Are you kiddin' me? Would this be on the home page?

Author:	Beef Rockmore [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Super Bowl Plays
When the game was on the line, quarterbacks and playmaking WRs made the difference. The Bears have neither. Enjoy the offseason. ...and nice calls Mac.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/