Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

well....
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=35022
Page 1 of 1

Author:  kujoe_7 [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:33 am ]
Post subject:  well....

the link mac ??

Author:  Jalapenos and More [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

It's been largely eliminated from the internet, but you can still find it if you do a little Google searching. Actually, there's been a big debate on Deadspin about whether it was the right thing to do to link to it when the story broke.

Author:  TheSerb [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

The obviuos ? is who is incharge of drilling the "peep hole" at Score to check out Kerry Sayers????????

Author:  Don Tiny [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

My question is where was Sean Salisbury that night?

Author:  Jalapenos and More [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

I can't believe Mac think that Andrews' sex appeal in any way legitimizes an unforgivable invasion of her privacy. You can't put a price on piece of mind, and it's been stolen from her.

I know an admirable trait like empathy, amazingly, is under attack these days. Bear with me. Depending on your age, imagine Andrews is your little sister, daughter or wife and this happened to her. And you know—despite her attractiveness and its role in her popularity—she would never reveal herself naked publicly, and now's it happened against her will and the images are forever public and widely proliferated. How would you feel about that? Would you think she'll ever have recourse that is commensurate to this violation?

Author:  doug - evergreen park [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

torrent it.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

Miss a little, miss a lot apparently ...

Did Mac outright say that she shouldn't be surpirsed and/or upset about the vid?

Author:  Krazy Ivan [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

Jalapenos and More wrote:
I can't believe Mac think that Andrews' sex appeal in any way legitimizes an unforgivable invasion of her privacy. You can't put a price on piece of mind, and it's been stolen from her.

I know an admirable trait like empathy, amazingly, is under attack these days. Bear with me. Depending on your age, imagine Andrews is your little sister, daughter or wife and this happened to her. And you know—despite her attractiveness and its role in her popularity—she would never reveal herself naked publicly, and now's it happened against her will and the images are forever public and widely proliferated. How would you feel about that? Would you think she'll ever have recourse that is commensurate to this violation?



doug - evergreen park wrote:
torrent it.



:lol: :lol: :lol: It's day's like this that remind me why I love this place...

Author:  Don Tiny [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

Jalapenos and More wrote:
I know an admirable trait like empathy, amazingly, is under attack these days. Bear with me. Depending on your age, imagine Andrews is your little sister, daughter or wife and this happened to her. And you know—despite her attractiveness and its role in her popularity—she would never reveal herself naked publicly, and now's it happened against her will and the images are forever public and widely proliferated. How would you feel about that? Would you think she'll ever have recourse that is commensurate to this violation?


I suppose it would depend on how hot she was and how incestuous one felt.

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

Jalapenos and More wrote:
imagine Andrews is your little sister, daughter


I'm going to choose not to do that.

Otherwise, I agree with everything you wrote.

Author:  Jalapenos and More [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Jalapenos and More wrote:
imagine Andrews is your little sister, daughter


I'm going to choose not to do that.

Otherwise, I agree with everything you wrote.

At least I didn't say mother.

Author:  doug - evergreen park [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

she's not my famous sister or famous daughter or famous mother...
so, I don't know how I would feel about it.

If it was my mom, then I be a little concerned seeing how she is 60. If it was my daughter, then I'd be really surprised b/c that would likely be kiddie porn and I don't have any kids that I am aware of.
If it was my sister well...wait...I have a famous sister who is on ESPN!!! sweet.

Author:  good dolphin [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

I'd sure hate for someone to have a peephole cam in my hotel room as I stand in front of my mirror doing my Buffalo Bill impression.

Author:  Eaglo Jeff [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

good dolphin wrote:
I'd sure hate for someone to have a peephole cam in my hotel room as I stand in front of my mirror doing my Buffalo Bill impression.

Wayne Larrivee wrote:
Good god!!!!

Author:  shirtless driver [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

good dolphin wrote:
I'd sure hate for someone to have a peephole cam in my hotel room as I stand in front of my mirror doing my Buffalo Bill impression.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I7IdcJDacg

Author:  Eaglo Jeff [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79Jt4Q5u ... re=related

Author:  Jalapenos and More [ Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: well....

I will not be clicking either of those links. Best wishes, J&M, LLC.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/