Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

I never root for an injury and I'm put off by those who do. My point was that if there was one pitcher in the AL Central whose injury would enhance the White Sox chances at winning the division, it would be Joe Nathan.

Mac wrote:

You were giddy.

Mac wrote:

You were giddy.

Darkside wrote:

Mac wrote:

You were giddy.

Cub fans would be happy if Pujols got hurt and had to miss the season. I mean they wouldn't be like "yes that asshole is hurt!" (most of them wouldn't anyway) It would be more of "Wow Pujols is gone, this REALLY helps the Cubs!"

Its the latter with Nathan. He's a great pitcher and by all accounts a good guy all the way around. Its terribly unfortunate for him, but it really helps my team out.

Well at least I'm listening.
And I wouldn't be happy if Pujols got hurt. I'm actually a fan. I think he could be the next to challenge the HR record. I'd like to see that. I root for the guy.

Darkside wrote:

Well at least I'm listening.
And I wouldn't be happy if Pujols got hurt. I'm actually a fan. I think he could be the next to challenge the HR record. I'd like to see that. I root for the guy.

A-Rod will challenge before Pujols.

Well at least I'm listening.
And I wouldn't be happy if Pujols got hurt. I'm actually a fan. I think he could be the next to challenge the HR record. I'd like to see that. I root for the guy.

doug - evergreen park wrote:

Darkside wrote:

Well at least I'm listening.
And I wouldn't be happy if Pujols got hurt. I'm actually a fan. I think he could be the next to challenge the HR record. I'd like to see that. I root for the guy.

A-Rod will challenge before Pujols.

I should have clarified... next clean palyer to challenge.
(Is Pujols clean?) I think he is.

Because nobody involved with the current St. Louis Cardinals staff would ever lead you to have any suspicion of their power hitters

Phil McCracken wrote:

Because nobody involved with the current St. Louis Cardinals staff would ever lead you to have any suspicion of their power hitters

You guys really think Pujols is dirty? He's not changed much in size from early on has he? He was tested in the minors when he was there right? And pretty much since what 2004? 2003?

Phil McCracken wrote:

Because nobody involved with the current St. Louis Cardinals staff would ever lead you to have any suspicion of their power hitters

You guys really think Pujols is dirty? He's not changed much in size from early on has he? He was tested in the minors when he was there right? And pretty much since what 2004? 2003?

lipidquadcab wrote:

He's clean.

Glad to hear the blood tests you ran on him came back spotless. I take back everything I said :roll:

lipid, if Pujols played for the Pirates would you say the same thing?

Darkside wrote:

Phil McCracken wrote:

Because nobody involved with the current St. Louis Cardinals staff would ever lead you to have any suspicion of their power hitters

You guys really think Pujols is dirty? He's not changed much in size from early on has he? He was tested in the minors when he was there right? And pretty much since what 2004? 2003?

All I know is where there is smoke there is usually fire and there is plenty of smoke around LaRussa....Canseco, McGwire, Ankiel, Edmonds, Rolen.....there are alot of guys on his teams that seem to have that extra edge. I am not saying 100% that he cheated but if I had to put money on it I would say that he has/is using HGH if not other suppliments.

Author:	Darkside [ Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Yeah, it's bad Karma to revel in the injuries of your rivals. No, I wouldn't wish for a division opponant to lose a star player at all. If you can't beat them at their best, you're not going to do well in the playoffs anyway. That's bad ju-ju dude. If I were you I'd make a donation to something on the way home.

Author:	IkeSouth [ Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:33 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
if mac and speigs get an injury, does it mean jason and matty a. get to fill in? im just sayin...

Author:	Mac [ Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:13 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
I never root for an injury and I'm put off by those who do. My point was that if there was one pitcher in the AL Central whose injury would enhance the White Sox chances at winning the division, it would be Joe Nathan.

Author:	Darkside [ Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Mac wrote: I never root for an injury and I'm put off by those who do. My point was that if there was one pitcher in the AL Central whose injury would enhance the White Sox chances at winning the division, it would be Joe Nathan. You were giddy.

Author:	Scorehead [ Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
No one should root for a player to get injured, but I guarantee that if Brett Favre or Aaron Rodgers goes down with a bad injury, this board lights up like a Christmas tree!

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Bad Ju-Ju, Bro. https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=43755	Page 1 of 2

Author:	good dolphin [ Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:53 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
If he dies, he dies.

Author:	Frank Coztansa [ Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:13 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Darkside wrote: Mac wrote: I never root for an injury and I'm put off by those who do. My point was that if there was one pitcher in the AL Central whose injury would enhance the White Sox chances at winning the division, it would be Joe Nathan. You were giddy. Cub fans would be happy if Pujols got hurt and had to miss the season. I mean they wouldn't be like "yes that asshole is hurt!" (most of them wouldn't anyway) It would be more of "Wow Pujols is gone, this REALLY helps the Cubs!" Its the latter with Nathan. He's a great pitcher and by all accounts a good guy all the way around. Its terribly unfortunate for him, but it really helps my team out.

Author:	Elar [ Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:17 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Darkside wrote: Mac wrote: I never root for an injury and I'm put off by those who do. My point was that if there was one pitcher in the AL Central whose injury would enhance the White Sox chances at winning the division, it would be Joe Nathan. You were giddy. I understand what you're saying. But, those two are always giggling, tee heeing and laughing like 5th graders. They always sound "giddy."

Author:	Darkside [ Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:42 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Well at least I'm listening. And I wouldn't be happy if Pujols got hurt. I'm actually a fan. I think he could be the next to challenge the HR record. I'd like to see that. I root for the guy.

Author:	IkeSouth [ Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:52 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
its one thing to be OK with some opposing player being hurt and missing a lot of games... i think thats call fun. to wish it on someone kinda sucks though... unless its bret farve.

Author:	Vincent Antonelli [ Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:58 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Frank Coztansa wrote: Darkside wrote: Mac wrote: I never root for an injury and I'm put off by those who do. My point was that if there was one pitcher in the AL Central whose injury would enhance the White Sox chances at winning the division, it would be Joe Nathan. You were giddy. Cub fans would be happy if Pujols got hurt and had to miss the season. I mean they wouldn't be like "yes that asshole is hurt!" (most of them wouldn't anyway) It would be more of "Wow Pujols is gone, this REALLY helps the Cubs!" Its the latter with Nathan. He's a great pitcher and by all accounts a good guy all the way around. Its terribly unfortunate for him, but it really helps my team out. Why do you respond to every sox post with a negative about the cubs? This has nothing to do with the cubs or cubs fans. Jesus you have a fan inferiority complex.

Author:	doug - evergreen park [ Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Darkside wrote: Well at least I'm listening. And I wouldn't be happy if Pujols got hurt. I'm actually a fan. I think he could be the next to challenge the HR record. I'd like to see that. I root for the guy. A-Rod will challenge before Pujols.

Author:	Darkside [ Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
doug - evergreen park wrote: Darkside wrote: Well at least I'm listening. And I wouldn't be happy if Pujols got hurt. I'm actually a fan. I think he could be the next to challenge the HR record. I'd like to see that. I root for the guy. A-Rod will challenge before Pujols. I should have clarified... next clean palyer to challenge. (Is Pujols clean?) I think he is.

Author:	Beef Rockmore [ Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:34 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
I don't root FOR an injury to happen. But if it happens to help my team have a better chance of winning, I'm not exactly disappointed for the injured player. So let me get this straight.... if your playing fantasy football, with the playoffs or money on the line, and one of your opponents key players gets hurt and doesn't return to the game, you're not the least bit pleased that you don't have to worry about that player kickin' your team's ass?

Author:	T-Bone [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
I am a Cubs fan who respects what Pujols brings to the game. He just doesn't seem to be the type of guy that would knowingly cheat. I may find out differently years from now, but that is my opinion. I read an article from Peter King a few weeks ago who was chatting with Parcells about football. Talk turned to baseball and Parcells mentioned that he walked by the Cardinals weight room at spring training at 6:45 in the morning and Pujols is in there all by himself lifting, and apparently he had been there a while. I am only mentioning this to clarify Pujol's amazing work ethic. The guy is soft spoken and seems to play the game the right way. He is active in his community and supports many charities. Maybe this is due to his child being handicapped but I have a feeling he'd be there either way. I could be wrong about the guy, but I hope not.

Author:	Phil McCracken [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
FYI Here is Albert in the minors.... Here he is now

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	A7X [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 11:53 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Darkside wrote: Well at least I'm listening. And I wouldn't be happy if Pujols got hurt. I'm actually a fan. I think he could be the next to challenge the HR record. I'd like to see that. I root for the guy. Ahh God bless HGH and the MLB players union.

Author:	Phil McCracken [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 11:56 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Darkside wrote: doug - evergreen park wrote: Darkside wrote: Well at least I'm listening. And I wouldn't be happy if Pujols got hurt. I'm actually a fan. I think he could be the next to challenge the HR record. I'd like to see that. I root for the guy. A-Rod will challenge before Pujols. I should have clarified... next clean palyer to challenge. (Is Pujols clean?) I think he is. Because nobody involved with the current St. Louis Cardinals staff would ever lead you to have any suspicion of their power hitters

Author:	Darkside [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:32 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Phil McCracken wrote: Because nobody involved with the current St. Louis Cardinals staff would ever lead you to have any suspicion of their power hitters You guys really think Pujols is dirty? He's not changed much in size from early on has he? He was tested in the minors when he was there right? And pretty much since what 2004? 2003?

Author:	Elar [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:45 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Darkside wrote: Phil McCracken wrote: Because nobody involved with the current St. Louis Cardinals staff would ever lead you to have any suspicion of their power hitters You guys really think Pujols is dirty? He's not changed much in size from early on has he? He was tested in the minors when he was there right? And pretty much since what 2004? 2003? HGH. I'm not sayin.....

Author:	lipidquadcab [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:58 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
He's clean.

Author:	Phil McCracken [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:36 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
lipidquadcab wrote: He's clean. Glad to hear the blood tests you ran on him came back spotless. I take back everything I said

Author:	lipidquadcab [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Phil McCracken wrote: lipidquadcab wrote: He's clean. Glad to hear the blood tests you ran on him came back spotless. I take back everything I said Just my opinion. indeed.

Author:	RFDC [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:45 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
lipid, if Pujols played for the Pirates would you say the same thing?

Author:	lipidquadcab [ Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
RFDC wrote: lipid, if Pujols played for the Pirates would you say the same thing? Yes.

Author:	Darkside [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 1:21 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
RFDC wrote: lipid, if Pujols played for the Pirates would you say the same thing? Why not? He's a goddamn cardinal and I still think he's clean. What are you getting at? What's your angle here? What are you digging for?

Author:	Elmhurst Steve [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Mac wrote: I never root for an injury and I'm put off by those who do. My point was that if there was one pitcher in the AL Central whose injury would enhance the White Sox chances at winning the division, it would be Joe Nathan. More than Justin Verlander?? I think Detroit is still the top contender with the Sox in 2010 and if they are to win, it will be Verlander leading the way. It's hard to know how the Twins will play in 2010, in the new ballpark where they will be outdoors.

Author:	Elar [ Sat Mar 13, 2010 1:43 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bad Ju-Ju, Bro.
Phil McCracken wrote: Darkside wrote: Phil McCracken wrote: Because nobody involved with the current St. Louis Cardinals staff would ever lead you to have any suspicion of their power hitters You guys really think Pujols is dirty? He's not changed much in size from early on has he? He was tested in the minors when he was there right? And pretty much since what 2004? 2003? All I know is where there is smoke there is usually fire and there is plenty of smoke around LaRussa....Canseco, McGwire, Ankiel, Edmonds, Rolen.....there are alot of guys on his teams that seem to have that extra edge. I am not saying 100% that he cheated but if I had to put money on it I would say that he has/is using HGH if not other suppliments. Tony LaRussa is a joke. You're comments are dead nuts on.