Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

MAC v CJH
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=72081
Page 1 of 1

Author:  bigfan [ Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:  MAC v CJH

Tuned into some CJH today for a few and got the "Who are the best athletes argument" which turned into are swimmers athletes? Are Gymnast better athletes than Jordan......ughhhhhhh

And I just pictured Mac in this discussion, which would have been ended in seconds with a 'Are we really gonna talk about who is the best athlete????".....and then there is Harry who thinks he is bringing in the ultimate Curveball with Ali..."Huh huh???"

Even Jurko and carmen realized they hit Max boredom...as No response was aired.,,,,but that is the difference without Mac...the bullshit gets onto the air without being called out.

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Well, Mac spent a few different segments today raving about the British Men's Gymnastics team.

Author:  Ed_from_Lisle [ Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Yeah, there are no dumb segments on Mac's show. Shep-ordy is always compelling radio.

:roll:

Author:  Spaulding [ Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

I don't listen to either much but you want to start a list of bullshit that gets on air on Mac's show? His current partner has shat more than Harry ever has.

Author:  Mr. Belvidere [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

I think Spiegs does a great job. I have never understood why so many dont like Matt. On the number one sports station in Chicago I cant say who is a better TWO guy.

Author:  good dolphin [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Spaulding wrote:
I don't listen to either much but you want to start a list of bullshit that gets on air on Mac's show? His current partner has shat more than Harry ever has.


Stop with your hyperbole. Harry entire radio existence is spent either setting up a bad joke or telling a bad joke.

Author:  crosscheck [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Mr. Belvidere wrote:
I think Spiegs does a great job. I have never understood why so many dont like Matt. On the number one sports station in Chicago I cant say who is a better TWO guy.

I don't understand it either...

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Mr. Belvidere wrote:
I think Spiegs does a great job. I have never understood why so many dont like Matt. On the number one sports station in Chicago I cant say who is a better TWO guy.


פּלוס איינער

Author:  Mr. Hernandez [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

good dolphin wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
I don't listen to either much but you want to start a list of bullshit that gets on air on Mac's show? His current partner has shat more than Harry ever has.


Stop with your hyperbole. Harry entire radio existence is spent either setting up a bad joke or telling a bad joke.


Agreed. Harry is by far the worst host in Chicago sports radio these days. His jokes are never funny his jokes when interviewing someone always end up with awkward silence. Since Mac left he's been free to run wild with his schtick. There was nothing better than listening to Mac put the smackdown on Harry

Spiegs is terrible too btw

Author:  SHARK [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

I was surprised that ESPN decided to keep Harry Teinowitz on its payroll following his DUI arrest a few months ago. I was under the impression that the folks in Bristol, CT had a zero tolerance policy toward its employees. Since his return, I've rarely listened, if it all, to that show. I thought Carmen DeFalco & John Jurkovic would be better off as a two-man show without Harry's bad jokes and one-liners. Harry simply isn't funny and adds little to that show.

Author:  RFDC [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Spaulding wrote:
I don't listen to either much but you want to start a list of bullshit that gets on air on Mac's show? His current partner has shat more than Harry ever has.


So you don't listen, but you know enough to make this statement?

Try again.

Author:  SHARK [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Ed_from_Lisle wrote:
Yeah, there are no dumb segments on Mac's show. Shep-ordy is always compelling radio.

:roll:

I thought it was called "Sports Jeopardy" before Mac recently re-named it for Nick Shepkowski, Ed, but it's better than "Jurko vs. Harry"...

Author:  denisdman [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

SHARK wrote:
I was surprised that ESPN decided to keep Harry Teinowitz on its payroll following his DUI arrest a few months ago. I was under the impression that the folks in Bristol, CT had a zero tolerance policy toward its employees. Since his return, I've rarely listened, if it all, to that show. I thought Carmen DeFalco & John Jurkovic would be better off as a two-man show without Harry's bad jokes and one-liners. Harry simply isn't funny and adds little to that show.


His DUI arrest a few months ago...it was March 2011. You need to do your job a lot better.

Author:  SHARK [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

denisdman wrote:
SHARK wrote:
I was surprised that ESPN decided to keep Harry Teinowitz on its payroll following his DUI arrest a few months ago. I was under the impression that the folks in Bristol, CT had a zero tolerance policy toward its employees. Since his return, I've rarely listened, if it all, to that show. I thought Carmen DeFalco & John Jurkovic would be better off as a two-man show without Harry's bad jokes and one-liners. Harry simply isn't funny and adds little to that show.


His DUI arrest a few months ago...it was March 2011. You need to do your job a lot better.

Thank you, Jim Rome... :lol:

Author:  Douchebag [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Who has the biggest dongs, gymnasts or swimmers?

Light'em up Chicago!

Author:  Spaulding [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

good dolphin wrote:
Stop with your hyperbole. Harry entire radio existence is spent either setting up a bad joke or telling a bad joke.


I can hyperbolize all I want. I know you love spiegel but I think he is terrible. You can argue Harry didn't add much to MJH but the number of times I punched the button because of Harry was small. Everytime I listen to M&S I listen for about 5-10 minutes and then I'm done. Spiegel is about 10 times as smarmy as Harry and I don't think he is a good fit as a partner with Mac. I don't even know what Speigel's radio existence could be. He's not funny. Doesn't seem too bright. Is his entire radio existence just waiting to get the chance to sing?

Author:  312player [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

It is not even close. Harry is by far the absolute worst radio personality in the region.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

312player wrote:
It is not even close. Harry is by far the absolute worst radio personality in the region.

I can say with confidence that you can extend that beyond region, he is just awful.

Author:  Spaulding [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

It's Speigel's delivery I can't get past. He pontifies everything he says. And then sings. He did it twice in 5 minutes before going to break. He makes Mac worse too.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Spaulding wrote:
It's Speigel's delivery I can't get past. He pontifies everything he says. And then sings. He did it twice in 5 minutes before going to break. He makes Mac worse too.

Agreed.

He tempers Mac's enthusiasm

Author:  City of Fools [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

what Score host would fit better with Mac, in your opinion spaulding?

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

rogers park bryan wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
It's Speigel's delivery I can't get past. He pontifies everything he says. And then sings. He did it twice in 5 minutes before going to break. He makes Mac worse too.

Agreed.

He tempers Mac's enthusiasm


That works both ways. Especially when it comes to the Sox.

Matt is 100x better than Teinowitz.

Author:  Urlacher's missing neck [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

The Princess pissypants routine that all to often occurs with Meat is a deal breaker.
The talk of his home life is revolting radio to listen to.
The making sure everyone knows he is a host and the producers are producers and below him act is petty.
Berating the production staff on air is unnecessary power tripping.
His parody songs are awful and annoying and way to frequent. The only chance parody songs have of working, which is still not all the time, is if its obvious the singers are just fucking around. He takes them 100 percent seriously.

All of those reasons over power the good baseball talk he can produce.

Give him hit and run and put him on every show doing baseball guest spots periodically.

Author:  Douchebag [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

City of Fools wrote:
what Score host would fit better with Mac, in your opinion spaulding?

Vandy

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
The Princess pissypants routine that all to often occurs with Meat is a deal breaker.
The talk of his home life is revolting radio to listen to.
The making sure everyone knows he is a host and the producers are producers and below him act is petty.
Berating the production staff on air is unnecessary power tripping.
His parody songs are awful and annoying and way to frequent. The only chance parody songs have of working, which is still not all the time, is if its obvious the singers are just fucking around. He takes them 100 percent seriously.

All of those reasons over power the good baseball talk he can produce.

Give him hit and run and put him on every show doing baseball guest spots periodically.


Your hatred has blinded you.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

Douchebag wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
what Score host would fit better with Mac, in your opinion spaulding?

Vandy


:lol:

Thank God that guy doesn't sit in anymore.

Author:  Spaulding [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

City of Fools wrote:
what Score host would fit better with Mac, in your opinion spaulding?


Don't know, not a lot of options there. Not a huge fan of the Score staff. At one time I thought he and drinky would do a good show. I've liked days when Mac has been on with Boers but didn't listen the first time around. May not be able to go home again so to speak. He did a good job picking Jurko but missed on Meatpants imo.

UMN, you know who he reminds me a lot of? The OG! Blech!

Author:  A7X [ Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MAC v CJH

SHARK wrote:
"Jurko vs. Harry"...


The only way I'd want to see that would be a Texas Death Match.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/