Hawg Ass wrote:
Agreed, not even close!
Jesus, that is more like it. You had me worried for a while, Hawg.....
Come here, you!
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=77221 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Beardown [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: A summary of the latest ratings report from Larz... As impressive as WSCR-AM's numbers were in the all ages demographic, giving them all-time highs, the numbers are even more impressive in the station's target demographic of Men 25-54. The gap between this sports talker and their closest rival, WMVP-AM seems to keep widening. Overall, WSCR-AM was #1 with Men 25-54 with a 5.9 share, while WMVP-AM was #11 with a 3.1. In mornings, WSCR-AM was again #1 with a 7.3 share, while WMVP-AM was #8 with only a 3.6 share. In middays, WSCR-AM is #2 with a 5.4 share (WDRV-FM is #1), while WMVP-AM is #9 with a 3.5 share. For afternoons, WSCR-AM is again #1 with a 6.5 share, while WMVP-AM is down to #17 with a 2.6 share. If this was a boxing match between these two radio stations, the referee would have stopped the fight by now. http://chicagoradioandmedia.com/news/3113-a-look-at-chicagos-january-2013-radio-ratings-from-arbitron I refuse to give credit to Spiegel. January: Men 25-54 Dan McNeil - 5.4 share #2 Waddle/Silvy - 3.5 share # 9 |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Beardown wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: A summary of the latest ratings report from Larz... As impressive as WSCR-AM's numbers were in the all ages demographic, giving them all-time highs, the numbers are even more impressive in the station's target demographic of Men 25-54. The gap between this sports talker and their closest rival, WMVP-AM seems to keep widening. Overall, WSCR-AM was #1 with Men 25-54 with a 5.9 share, while WMVP-AM was #11 with a 3.1. In mornings, WSCR-AM was again #1 with a 7.3 share, while WMVP-AM was #8 with only a 3.6 share. In middays, WSCR-AM is #2 with a 5.4 share (WDRV-FM is #1), while WMVP-AM is #9 with a 3.5 share. For afternoons, WSCR-AM is again #1 with a 6.5 share, while WMVP-AM is down to #17 with a 2.6 share. If this was a boxing match between these two radio stations, the referee would have stopped the fight by now. http://chicagoradioandmedia.com/news/3113-a-look-at-chicagos-january-2013-radio-ratings-from-arbitron I refuse to give credit to Spiegel. January: Men 25-54 Dan McNeil - 5.4 share #2 Waddle/Silvy - 3.5 share # 9 Best sports talk show in Chicago |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Look at Mac putting another show on his back and leading it to heights never seen before. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
It's all because of Speigel. Way to go Candyman! |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Terry's Peeps wrote: It's all because of Speigel. No. He has no statistics for missing the "minimum days hosted" threshold.
Way to go Candyman! |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
SomeGuy wrote: Beardown wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: A summary of the latest ratings report from Larz... As impressive as WSCR-AM's numbers were in the all ages demographic, giving them all-time highs, the numbers are even more impressive in the station's target demographic of Men 25-54. The gap between this sports talker and their closest rival, WMVP-AM seems to keep widening. Overall, WSCR-AM was #1 with Men 25-54 with a 5.9 share, while WMVP-AM was #11 with a 3.1. In mornings, WSCR-AM was again #1 with a 7.3 share, while WMVP-AM was #8 with only a 3.6 share. In middays, WSCR-AM is #2 with a 5.4 share (WDRV-FM is #1), while WMVP-AM is #9 with a 3.5 share. For afternoons, WSCR-AM is again #1 with a 6.5 share, while WMVP-AM is down to #17 with a 2.6 share. If this was a boxing match between these two radio stations, the referee would have stopped the fight by now. http://chicagoradioandmedia.com/news/3113-a-look-at-chicagos-january-2013-radio-ratings-from-arbitron I refuse to give credit to Spiegel. January: Men 25-54 Dan McNeil - 5.4 share #2 Waddle/Silvy - 3.5 share # 9 Best sports talk show in Chicago Not even close!!! |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Hawg Ass wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Beardown wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: A summary of the latest ratings report from Larz... As impressive as WSCR-AM's numbers were in the all ages demographic, giving them all-time highs, the numbers are even more impressive in the station's target demographic of Men 25-54. The gap between this sports talker and their closest rival, WMVP-AM seems to keep widening. Overall, WSCR-AM was #1 with Men 25-54 with a 5.9 share, while WMVP-AM was #11 with a 3.1. In mornings, WSCR-AM was again #1 with a 7.3 share, while WMVP-AM was #8 with only a 3.6 share. In middays, WSCR-AM is #2 with a 5.4 share (WDRV-FM is #1), while WMVP-AM is #9 with a 3.5 share. For afternoons, WSCR-AM is again #1 with a 6.5 share, while WMVP-AM is down to #17 with a 2.6 share. If this was a boxing match between these two radio stations, the referee would have stopped the fight by now. http://chicagoradioandmedia.com/news/3113-a-look-at-chicagos-january-2013-radio-ratings-from-arbitron I refuse to give credit to Spiegel. January: Men 25-54 Dan McNeil - 5.4 share #2 Waddle/Silvy - 3.5 share # 9 Best sports talk show in Chicago Not even close!!! Find a tall building and jump off of it. Congrats |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
I don't like heights! Congrats!! |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Hawg Ass wrote: I don't like heights! Congrats!! That's not the point! Fuck You! Congrats! |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
SomeGuy wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: I don't like heights! Congrats!! That's not the point! Fuck You! Congrats! Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you....who's next? Congrats! |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Keeping Score wrote: I can't believe Hawg finally turned on his guy Mackeyfish. He is nothing but a slimy, disgusting and backstabbing sellout. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
SomeGuy wrote: Keeping Score wrote: I can't believe Hawg finally turned on his guy Mackeyfish. He is nothing but a slimy, disgusting and backstabbing sellout. I would love for one of you to show me where I turned my allegiances, Mac is God and he has a LOT of heavy lifting to do. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Hawg Ass wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Keeping Score wrote: I can't believe Hawg finally turned on his guy Mackeyfish. He is nothing but a slimy, disgusting and backstabbing sellout. I would love for one of you to show me where I turned my allegiances, Mac is God and he has a LOT of heavy lifting to do. I see what you did there. And, you know, with all the board tensions between The Apologists and those who live in reality I guess I don't know who to trust anymore. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
SomeGuy wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Keeping Score wrote: I can't believe Hawg finally turned on his guy Mackeyfish. He is nothing but a slimy, disgusting and backstabbing sellout. I would love for one of you to show me where I turned my allegiances, Mac is God and he has a LOT of heavy lifting to do. I see what you did there. And, you know, with all the board tensions between The Apologists and those who live in reality I guess I don't know who to trust anymore. I am with you, I am a part of you, I am well um yeah that is all. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
hiram wrote: Another win for the good guys! Congratulation Mac! Yep. Another big win for the best sports talk show in Chicago. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Agreed, not even close! |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Hawg Ass wrote: Agreed, not even close! Jesus, that is more like it. You had me worried for a while, Hawg..... Come here, you!
|
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
SomeGuy wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: Agreed, not even close! Jesus, that is more like it. You had me worried for a while, Hawg..... Come here, you! They can't win!! |
|
| Author: | K Effective [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
You guys must not really listen to Mac- he told me to PTFB, that's what I did. Silvy&Waddle FTW |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
K Effective wrote: You guys must not really listen to Mac- he told me to PTFB, that's what I did. Silvy&Waddle FTW I also enjoy that show, although I liked Carmen and Silvy a bit more. |
|
| Author: | Mr. Hernandez [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Mac and Spiegs is terrible. I love Mac but id like to hear him with someone else and put in the afternoon spot. W&S is a far better show in every aspect imo. I think they have much better sports talk |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Mr. Hernandez wrote: Mac and Spiegs is terrible. I love Mac but id like to hear him with someone else and put in the afternoon spot. W&S is a far better show in every aspect imo. I think they have much better sports talk Ya but Waddle cant carry a tune |
|
| Author: | Mr. Hernandez [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
rogers park bryan wrote: Mr. Hernandez wrote: Mac and Spiegs is terrible. I love Mac but id like to hear him with someone else and put in the afternoon spot. W&S is a far better show in every aspect imo. I think they have much better sports talk Ya but Waddle cant carry a tune The King can be annoying at times but Spiegs is almost Harry-like |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Mr. Hernandez wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Mr. Hernandez wrote: Mac and Spiegs is terrible. I love Mac but id like to hear him with someone else and put in the afternoon spot. W&S is a far better show in every aspect imo. I think they have much better sports talk Ya but Waddle cant carry a tune The King can be annoying at times but Spiegs is almost Harry-like I was kidding, I dont care for either of them. And Spiegs is now "Candyman" |
|
| Author: | ZephMarshack [ Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Good to see the best and most intelligent show on sports radio is able to recover some of the share and the #1 rating the Mac show squanders once it comes on after the funniest show on sports radio. |
|
| Author: | Tall Midget [ Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
SomeGuy wrote: K Effective wrote: You guys must not really listen to Mac- he told me to PTFB, that's what I did. Silvy&Waddle FTW I also enjoy that show, although I liked Carmen and Silvy a bit more. Carmen and Silvy was a great show. Waddle is unlistenable. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Silvy and Jurko, could be a run for ESPN...Delevitt should know it's better to come close to winning in one time slot, then gettin killed in 2! Silvy would do better alone! |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
Tall Midget wrote: SomeGuy wrote: K Effective wrote: You guys must not really listen to Mac- he told me to PTFB, that's what I did. Silvy&Waddle FTW I also enjoy that show, although I liked Carmen and Silvy a bit more. Carmen and Silvy was a great show. Waddle is unlistenable. Waddle is too wishy-washy and guarded with what he says....that's death by boredom. If he didn't have his TV gigs I bet he would sound different. |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan McNeil wang whips Waddle and Silvy |
hiram wrote: We put a hurting on W&S and will continue to do so. Mac is ratings gold. He always wins in the end. We? We? What role did you play in Mac's victory? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|