I am hoping they lose the show pot, they are clueless. If you want to turn a profit you cherry pick 1-2 games a month n play heavy, nickel @ least.

I am hoping they lose the show pot, they are clueless. If you want to turn a profit you cherry pick 1-2 games a month n play heavy, nickel @ least.

While I do not want them to lose the show pot, I agree with you about their betting. If you learn anything about betting over the years, it's that the more wagers you make, the more likely you are to give back whatever you may win. Better to make stronger plays on fewer games in my opinion. Mac is best with NFL games or even colloge football. Best to wager on what you know best. This betting on college basketball, when none of the guys really know the teams....bad idea.

Meat already said he's off for the next week.

No, that's very wrong. Bankroll management is probably the most important thing when sports gambling.

Kirkwood has it right. The bets should be dictated by the value available. Whether there are many or none at all is dependent solely upon the lines.

Are you kiddin' me?

Spiegs is a moron, Mac should do all the picking.

Kirkwood is not right, "manage bankroll" ? How so ... only managing to lose it slowly by betting on so many games.

You think if your goal is to win say 2k in 5 weeks .. you are more likely to go 22-4 or 2-0? I used to bet like these guys when I was much younger and wanted some interest in a game, it don't work in the long run.

You clearly don't know the first fucking thing about managing a gambling bankroll. I have no intention of teaching you either.

Spiegs is a moron, Mac should do all the picking.

Kwood, u know why Mac has 3 winning seasons over 20?







Because he is betting on 3-5 NFL games a week. If he would bet one a week or even 2 a month his luck would change.

Kwood, u know why Mac has 3 winning seasons over 20?







Because he is betting on 3-5 NFL games a week. If he would bet one a week or even 2 a month his luck would change.

They really have no clue. Maybe they will get lucky and win or tread water for a period of time but it likely won't last.
They get the worst of the line almost every time and if you play the "grind it out style" that will eventually eat you alive at the book they play at.
Mac saying " the Hawks were only -110"
When they bet the Hawks they could have had them as high as +105 at other books.
That's a huge difference.
They are not even close to being skilled enough to overcome that.

They really have no clue. Maybe they will get lucky and win or tread water for a period of time but it likely won't last.
They get the worst of the line almost every time and if you play the "grind it out style" that will eventually eat you alive at the book they play at.
Mac saying " the Hawks were only -110"
When they bet the Hawks they could have had them as high as +105 at other books.
That's a huge difference.
They are not even close to being skilled enough to overcome that.