City of Fools wrote:
apparently I'm the only one listening.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=78200 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
we just won't tell you about them until the week's end... |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
They teased changes to the show? |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
apparently I'm the only one listening. Not sure if they specifically indicated their show or the station as a whole, but yes. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
Think it was the station not the show. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
City of Fools wrote: apparently I'm the only one listening. Not sure if they specifically indicated their show or the station as a whole, but yes. It was a vague tease by Mac. Why am I getting "Hot Arab Girls" banner ads? Every time I hear "Arab," I think of the Clayton Bigsby skit. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
pittmike wrote: Think it was the station not the show. Agreed. That's what I heard about 2 hours ago. Mac & Spiegs couldn't mention specifics...at least at this time. |
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
City of Fools wrote: apparently I'm the only one listening.
|
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
*crickets* |
|
| Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
Terry's Peeps wrote: They teased changes to the show? I wasn't paying close attention but I thought they implied an announcement regarding the signing of a new expert(s).
|
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: They teased changes to the show? I wasn't paying close attention but I thought they implied an announcement regarding the signing of a new expert(s).
|
|
| Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
At least it is the 1st week of the month and the miserable candyman will of course have cover band responsibilities and a sore throat and be off work...........thus making the show awesome and listenable!!! |
|
| Author: | A7X [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
redskingreg wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: They teased changes to the show? I wasn't paying close attention but I thought they implied an announcement regarding the signing of a new expert(s). Wow! Hey Kendall, Adam Duritz wants his hair back!
|
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: They teased changes to the show? I wasn't paying close attention but I thought they implied an announcement regarding the signing of a new expert(s).You're more than likely right but that's not quite what they intimated. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
A7X wrote: redskingreg wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: They teased changes to the show? I wasn't paying close attention but I thought they implied an announcement regarding the signing of a new expert(s). Wow! Hey Kendall, Adam Duritz wants his hair back!Adam Duritz got a legendary amount of ass with that cut. Maybe Kendall knows what he's doing... |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
Duritz didn't get women because he was attractive. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
City of Fools wrote: Duritz didn't get women because he was attractive. I thought he was once linked to Courtney Cox, long before she married David Arquette... |
|
| Author: | A7X [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
City of Fools wrote: Duritz didn't get women because he was attractive. He plays the whole tortured soul routine. I'm not faulting him, but some chicks fall for that shit. His tail list is impressive. It's now being challenged heartily by John Mayer. |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
SHARK wrote: City of Fools wrote: Duritz didn't get women because he was attractive. I thought he was once linked to Courtney Cox, long before she married David Arquette... he was linked to a lot of women. Women LOVE storyteller singers, good storytellers at least. Women love lots of words in a song (see: Matthews, Dave). Women at heart are lite Jazz fans. Throw a little musical creativity at them and watch them melt. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
City of Fools wrote: SHARK wrote: City of Fools wrote: Duritz didn't get women because he was attractive. I thought he was once linked to Courtney Cox, long before she married David Arquette... he was linked to a lot of women. Women LOVE storyteller singers, good storytellers at least. Women love lots of words in a song (see: Matthews, Dave). Women at heart are lite Jazz fans. Throw a little musical creativity at them and watch them melt. Does that also explain the appeal for John Mayer...especially among women? |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
Dallas Winston mentioned that a couple posts up. Duritz is far more lyrically complex than Mayer. But Mayer's a better musician overall. Duritz just sings. |
|
| Author: | A7X [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
Adam Levine is another well known swordsman. |
|
| Author: | Minooka Meatball [ Tue Apr 02, 2013 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4/2-You Want Changes, We Got Changes... |
SHARK wrote: City of Fools wrote: SHARK wrote: City of Fools wrote: Duritz didn't get women because he was attractive. I thought he was once linked to Courtney Cox, long before she married David Arquette... he was linked to a lot of women. Women LOVE storyteller singers, good storytellers at least. Women love lots of words in a song (see: Matthews, Dave). Women at heart are lite Jazz fans. Throw a little musical creativity at them and watch them melt. Does that also explain the appeal for John Mayer...especially among women? The reasons for Mayer's appeal to women is something else that's...legendary. Allegedly. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|