Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
4/11 Mac is back https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=78393 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:28 am ] |
Post subject: | 4/11 Mac is back |
I missed the start. Did Mac explain the absence? |
Author: | bigfan [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
Grew a third arm |
Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZC56BwU82zY |
Author: | redskingreg [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
pittmike wrote: I missed the start. Did Mac explain the absence? Not a peep, unless I missed it. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
redskingreg wrote: pittmike wrote: I missed the start. Did Mac explain the absence? Not a peep, unless I missed it. I missed you too greg. |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
Good show today, fellas! Mac is back and firing on all cylinders. |
Author: | uofiguy [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
Jesus Christ Mac, we've heard the Singletary isn't in the top 5 of '85 Bears rant countless times, such a tired spiel. Always followed up with the fact that Mac's buddies on that team didn't like Singletary. Getting stale Dan. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
uofiguy wrote: Jesus Christ Mac, we've heard the Singletary isn't in the top 5 of '85 Bears rant countless times, such a tired spiel. Always followed up with the fact that Mac's buddies on that team didn't like Singletary. Getting stale Dan. Audience changes every 10 seconds I hear ya, but Id give him a pass since their are people thinking the Bears should be asking for Singletary's blessing to use his number |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
rogers park bryan wrote: uofiguy wrote: Jesus Christ Mac, we've heard the Singletary isn't in the top 5 of '85 Bears rant countless times, such a tired spiel. Always followed up with the fact that Mac's buddies on that team didn't like Singletary. Getting stale Dan. Audience changes every 10 seconds I hear ya, but Id give him a pass since their are people thinking the Bears should be asking for Singletary's blessing to use his number Yeah, it's relevant, sure. But it does get tiresome to hear the "Singletary wasn't even top FIVE on that team! And people from that team agree!" trope from everyone on the station when #50 and the 85 team is brought up. They speak about it in such a way like it's taboo and they just uncovered a super duper seceret that no one has ever spoke about, that they should be speaking about it in hushed tones or face the Ghost of Walter haunting them at night for daring to speak truth to power! |
Author: | uofiguy [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
rogers park bryan wrote: uofiguy wrote: Jesus Christ Mac, we've heard the Singletary isn't in the top 5 of '85 Bears rant countless times, such a tired spiel. Always followed up with the fact that Mac's buddies on that team didn't like Singletary. Getting stale Dan. Audience changes every 10 seconds I hear ya, but Id give him a pass since their are people thinking the Bears should be asking for Singletary's blessing to use his number Good point. I think it's just complete '85 fatigue on my part. Seems a bit ridiculous to be calling Hampton over it. Thought I always enjoy anticipating the next farm analogy/malaprop from Hamp. |
Author: | redskingreg [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
Any word regarding the absence? |
Author: | uofiguy [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
redskingreg wrote: Any word regarding the absence? I haven't heard anything, other than Mac saying it's good to be back a couple times. Just said it again...has to make people wonder if he doesnt say anything, right? |
Author: | redskingreg [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
"Are we actually going to talk baseball?" from Len |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
redskingreg wrote: Any word regarding the absence? Not that I've heard. Steve in Elmhurst had stated that he knew what was really going on....I wonder if he could elaborate |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
where's Beardown when you really need him? Suspension? Divorce? In the slammer? |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
uofiguy wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: uofiguy wrote: Jesus Christ Mac, we've heard the Singletary isn't in the top 5 of '85 Bears rant countless times, such a tired spiel. Always followed up with the fact that Mac's buddies on that team didn't like Singletary. Getting stale Dan. Audience changes every 10 seconds I hear ya, but Id give him a pass since their are people thinking the Bears should be asking for Singletary's blessing to use his number Good point. I think it's just complete '85 fatigue on my part. Seems a bit ridiculous to be calling Hampton over it. Thought I always enjoy anticipating the next farm analogy/malaprop from Hamp. He called Hampton? I have heard that one enough |
Author: | SHARK [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
I don't know if the live read for Ritz Crackerfuls or the guys' upcoming White Sox chat with MLB.com's Scott Merkin made the guys chuckle. |
Author: | Scorehead [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
Hatchetman wrote: where's Beardown when you really need him? Suspension? Divorce? In the slammer? I hope he didn't fall off the wagon. |
Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
SomeGuy wrote: But it does get tiresome to hear the "Singletary wasn't even top FIVE on that team! And people from that team agree!" trope from everyone on the station when #50 and the 85 team is brought up. They speak about it in such a way like it's taboo and they just uncovered a super duper seceret that no one has ever spoke about, that they should be speaking about it in hushed tones or face the Ghost of Walter haunting them at night for daring to speak truth to power! |
Author: | Elmhurst Steve [ Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
SomeGuy wrote: redskingreg wrote: Any word regarding the absence? Not that I've heard. Steve in Elmhurst had stated that he knew what was really going on....I wonder if he could elaborate Unless Mac wants to say the nature of his absence, I think it's best I refrain from elaborating. I think Dan is still waiting for some results and perhaps once he has all the information, he will be more forthcoming. Suffice to say, that it was a legitimate health issue and had nothing to do with drugs or alcohol. I'm very happy he's doing better and back on the air. |
Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
Low T |
Author: | good dolphin [ Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
Magic AIDS |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 4/11 Mac is back |
Elmhurst Steve wrote: SomeGuy wrote: redskingreg wrote: Any word regarding the absence? Not that I've heard. Steve in Elmhurst had stated that he knew what was really going on....I wonder if he could elaborate Unless Mac wants to say the nature of his absence, I think it's best I refrain from elaborating. I think Dan is still waiting for some results and perhaps once he has all the information, he will be more forthcoming. Suffice to say, that it was a legitimate health issue and had nothing to do with drugs or alcohol. I'm very happy he's doing better and back on the air. Methinks you've already said too much. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |