ah good to have mac backEddie Lacey being out would hurt the Packers more than Rodgers being out this week vs. the Bears.
Runaway MEATBALL!
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| meatball mac https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=84026 |
Page 1 of 5 |
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | meatball mac |
| ah good to have mac back Eddie Lacey being out would hurt the Packers more than Rodgers being out this week vs. the Bears. Runaway MEATBALL! |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Given the Bears run defense, this is not that outlandish of a statement. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Given the Bears run defense, this is not that outlandish of a statement. The Bears run defense being so bad is what makes this a meatball thought. You could get 150 yds Sunday vs the Bears run D. That with Flynn under center is beatable. That with Rodgers under center is a loss for the beloved. |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
I can see the logic in that statement, but we are talking a good running back versus an All-Pro caliber quarterback... ...also, I think the Rams proved you can stick pretty much any running back against that defense and get a 100 yards, so you really don't need anything special at that position to succeed. edit: fuck I just agreed with RFDC...
|
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
lipidquadcab wrote: I can see the logic in that statement, but we are talking a good running back versus an All-Pro caliber quarterback... ...also, I think the Rams proved you can stick pretty much any running back against that defense and get a 100 yards, so you really don't need anything special at that position to succeed. edit: fuck I just agreed with RFDC... Merry Christmas Lipid! 
|
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
RFDC wrote: lipidquadcab wrote: I can see the logic in that statement, but we are talking a good running back versus an All-Pro caliber quarterback... ...also, I think the Rams proved you can stick pretty much any running back against that defense and get a 100 yards, so you really don't need anything special at that position to succeed. edit: fuck I just agreed with RFDC... Merry Christmas Lipid! Merry Christmas to you as well...hope it is a good one. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Rodgers would be at least a little rusty if he played on Sun. Temps dipping into the single digits by halftime would not help. I could not get 150 yards against the Bears defense. Bernsteen could though. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Rodgers won't matter. After 15 games, it's pretty clear that you don't need to do much to beat a Mel Tucker coached defense. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Rodgers would be at least a little rusty if he played on Sun. Temps dipping into the single digits by halftime would not help. I could not get 150 yards against the Bears defense. Bernsteen could though. Oh Bernsie would go off for 250 on the ground and another 100 recieving. I don't buy the Rodgers rusty thing. He might be rusty for a series, but then same ole Rodgers would show up and shreds the secondary. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
RFDC wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Rodgers would be at least a little rusty if he played on Sun. Temps dipping into the single digits by halftime would not help. I could not get 150 yards against the Bears defense. Bernsteen could though. Oh Bernsie would go off for 250 on the ground and another 100 recieving. I don't buy the Rodgers rusty thing. He might be rusty for a series, but then same ole Rodgers would show up and shreds the secondary. Flynn could do that too. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
veganfan21 wrote: RFDC wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Rodgers would be at least a little rusty if he played on Sun. Temps dipping into the single digits by halftime would not help. I could not get 150 yards against the Bears defense. Bernsteen could though. Oh Bernsie would go off for 250 on the ground and another 100 recieving. I don't buy the Rodgers rusty thing. He might be rusty for a series, but then same ole Rodgers would show up and shreds the secondary. Flynn could do that too. No doubt he could. Rodgers would. Flynn could. I will take my chances with could. |
|
| Author: | billypootons [ Wed Dec 25, 2013 2:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
starks will have no problem running the ball if lacy can't play. if rodgers is announced as starter watch the line move 7-8 points towards the pack |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Thu Dec 26, 2013 1:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
the only person who has stopped a RB against the Bear defense since October is Rob Chudzinski |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Dec 26, 2013 1:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Given the Bears run defense, this is not that outlandish of a statement. Yes it is. As dolphin loves to point out, there's not a significant dropoff between Lacy and Starks. Compare that to the dropoff of the best QB in the league vs a QB that is struggling to stay in the league. It's a terrible thought. Im glad Mac is back as well though. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Thu Dec 26, 2013 5:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
good dolphin wrote: the only person who has stopped a RB against the Bear defense since October is Rob Chudzinski That is so true. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
| Love how mac says now that the Bears have lost that he does not claim to be a Bears fan, but an NFL fan. So when the bears win he is a Bears fan. But when they lose he is an NFL fan. how convenient |
|
| Author: | Mac [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
have i struck ANYBODY as a dyed-in-the-wool Bears fan in recent years? i cover the team.... find them fascinating. love it that so many people in this town are so passionate about them. for me, it's difficult to be a fan. i know too much about how they've done business. when you fuck over my friends, i'm done with you. the bears are product to me.... nothing more. the blackhawks are the only pro team in town i truly love. i'm fond of the sox, but it'll never ever be better than it was in '05 for a handful of reasons. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Mac wrote: have i struck ANYBODY as a dyed-in-the-wool Bears fan in recent years? i cover the team.... find them fascinating. love it that so many people in this town are so passionate about them. for me, it's difficult to be a fan. i know too much about how they've done business. when you fuck over my friends, i'm done with you. the bears are product to me.... nothing more. the blackhawks are the only pro team in town i truly love. i'm fond of the sox, but it'll never ever be better than it was in '05 for a handful of reasons. Sounds fair to me. Fair weather. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Weak. Bring back North. He seems to be the only host in town that still actually likes the Bears. Guess it's not cool to be a fan any longer. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Yep fair weather. So the Blackhawks have not fucked over anyone? Give me a break. When the Bears win it is all victory chicken and meatball mac running wild. When they lose it is "I am an NFL fan" |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
|
|
| Author: | Mac [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
you have the luxury of not knowing what i know. |
|
| Author: | Mac [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
why do you need "a fan" to moderate discussion? talk about meatball. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Mac wrote: why do you need "a fan" to moderate discussion? talk about meatball. Just makes me feel good. What's wrong with being a meatball? The Score was built on meatballs. |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
what the hell could Mac possibly be talking about? Virginia is a mass murderer? Short of that who fucking cares what the McClaskeys have done? Bill Wirtz was the slimiest fucking scumball who ever owned a sports team. Root for the JERSEY!! Did somebody hack into Mac's account?? Yes YOU DUMBSHIT. We are ALL meatballs. That why we listen to your stupid fucking show you MORON! |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Mac wrote: why do you need "a fan" to moderate discussion? talk about meatball. I could care less whether you are a fan or not a fan, I do not need either to moderate a discussion. I just want you to pick a side. Be a fan all the time or put on your damn cheese hat "NFL fan" all the time. Don't be whatever is convenient based on the last game |
|
| Author: | Mac [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
that comment was for dr. ken, who misses north because he was a true bears fan. by the way... "I COULDN'T care less...." not "I COULD care less.." |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Mac wrote: that comment was for dr. ken, who misses north because he was a true bears fan. by the way... "I COULDN'T care less...." not "I COULD care less.." Thanks for the correction. Now fire Meatpants and all will be forgiven. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
I'm tired of the Score position of hating people that really love the team and marginalizing them. That's what makes being a fan fun. I always loved that Mac was the exception to that groupthink. I don't like this turn of events. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: meatball mac |
Danny Green and Gold! Finger and Meat on tomorrow with special inside info from Zzz and Larry! |
|
| Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|