Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=85240 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Beardown [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
CSFMB: You replace Finfer. Shep: CSFMB: Don't fight it or reject it. Look at Finfer. Quite frankly, being Mac's bitch is your only way for you to make it. Shep: Fuck you. CSFMB: Can you lose the thick/nasally Chicago accent? Shep: No. CSFMB: Can you get Mac smokes? Shep: Yep CSFMB: That's how you're gonna make it, kid. That's your ticket. Finfer: He's right!!! Do it, Shep. Be the bitch!!! Shep: I'll do it. Marlboro Reds or Marlboro Lights, Mac? Mac: Lights, kid. I'm back to my commitment to excellence. |
Author: | bigfan [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Shep has a high bar to reach. I wish him well |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Shep embraced it years ago. You're late to this. |
Author: | Colonel Angus [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
You would think w/ all the health issues Mac has, he'd give up smoking. |
Author: | Mac [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Obviously, you've never been to a 12-step meeting! Smoking is large in the recovery community. Damage reduction? |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Mac wrote: Obviously, you've never been to a 12-step meeting! Smoking is large in the recovery community. Damage reduction? Not smoking as much as the new WGNG-The Game....amirite? |
Author: | NearWessSideHussra [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Mac wrote: Obviously, you've never been to a 12-step meeting! Smoking is large in the recovery community. Damage reduction? |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
why not chew tobacco? much less risky. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Colonel Angus wrote: You would think w/ all the health issues Mac has, he'd give up smoking. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Hatchetman wrote: why not chew tobacco? much less risky. Is this a joke? |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Curious Hair wrote: Hatchetman wrote: why not chew tobacco? much less risky. Is this a joke? No its true! I didn't say no risk. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
The cancers that come from oral tobacco are just as horrifying as the heart and lung cancer incurred by smoking. |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
outside of pot as a yout',never smoked a day in my life. My problem is pasta,pizza,burgers,hotdogs,etc. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
We are kindred spirits. My deleterious gas station purchase of utter shame is beef jerky. I slide it across the counter, knowing I'm being judged by other customers for my Bag O' Cancer. I had mostly quit, though, until a relapse last week on a long road trip. |
Author: | Zizou [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Aww, a Dan Bernstein and Caller Anne moment. |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Zizou wrote: Aww, a Dan Bernstein and Caller Anne moment. "Can I get a score?" |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
One study compared life expectancies of 35-year-old smokers with smokeless product users and nonusers. Smokers averaged a life expectancy nearly eight years lower than those who used smokeless tobacco or did not use tobacco (28.1 years versus 35.9 years in the latter two groups). Smokeless tobacco users averaged a life expectancy 15 days shorter than a nonuser. However, another study found that smokers who switched to smokeless tobacco from cigarettes had a higher rate of death from any cause than patients who stopped tobacco use. Nevermind. Maybe switch to old stogies. |
Author: | bigfan [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Mac wrote: Obviously, you've never been to a 12-step meeting! Smoking is large in the recovery community. Damage reduction? Methodone clinic in a building I managed. Put 3 ashtrays outside, a bench 30 feet from door and covered area, still couldnt keep the cigg butts off the grass. FYI, Meth clinic signed lease as a "Community center" backed by State of Illinois. Get the check every month, no fight there. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Hatchetman wrote: One study compared life expectancies of 35-year-old smokers with smokeless product users and nonusers. Smokers averaged a life expectancy nearly eight years lower than those who used smokeless tobacco or did not use tobacco (28.1 years versus 35.9 years in the latter two groups). Smokeless tobacco users averaged a life expectancy 15 days shorter than a nonuser. However, another study found that smokers who switched to smokeless tobacco from cigarettes had a higher rate of death from any cause than patients who stopped tobacco use. Nevermind. Maybe switch to old stogies. Or ... you know ... just stop it entirely. |
Author: | Beardown [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Mac to Finfer (Love the way she sang this by the way. She's probably the only women that can look hot with a crew cut, by the way. She looked good.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUiTQvT0W_0 |
Author: | good dolphin [ Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Nothing wrong with accepting mentorship, especially from a guy with a proven track record of taking care of his boys. |
Author: | Dallas Winston [ Thu Feb 20, 2014 1:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
Mac wrote: Obviously, you've never been to a 12-step meeting! Smoking is large in the recovery community. Damage reduction? Indeed. I think I'm one of the very few that don't smoke. I do however drink the mandatory 6 cups of coffee. |
Author: | sinicalypse [ Thu Feb 20, 2014 1:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Shepkoski is Mac's new bitch |
bigfan wrote: Mac wrote: Obviously, you've never been to a 12-step meeting! Smoking is large in the recovery community. Damage reduction? Methodone clinic in a building I managed. Put 3 ashtrays outside, a bench 30 feet from door and covered area, still couldnt keep the cigg butts off the grass. FYI, Meth clinic signed lease as a "Community center" backed by State of Illinois. Get the check every month, no fight there. what, you're implying that people who respect society enough to go out and get an illegal drug habit likely fortified by lies/thievery/devil-may-care-attitude are prone to not respecting other people's property/possessions? get out of town. i'll have you know that i've patronized such establishments and outside of the kids who purposely threw their car behind mine as i was backing out so they could claim that i caused their pre-existing-rear-quarter-panel-dent and thus say "if you got $150 or $200 we'll take it cash and call it a day" AREN'T upstanding people? or the gothy rag doll chick who i wanted to fuck something fierce because even tho i stopped and realize "if she's a dopehead who looks that good with a habit this bad she's prolly got some hard mileage on that cooch?" i just didnt care because sometimes the worm has to get wet? --- ahem. yeah outside of them and maybe the pedantic staff they were all GOOD UPSTANDING PEOPLE who were a proud part of any, let alone my, community! why this is stereotyping and slandering at its worst, biggie! how do you know that the other tenants of the building didn't litter all over the grass? were you there during dispensing hours, or were you (most likely) 500+yds away from those scumbags at all times? =D |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |