Hell, anything is better than the ultra-lib, homosexual loving...

North might be a meathead, but he and Doug together were highly entertaining. Could listen to them forever.

Hell, anything is better than the ultra-lib, homosexual loving Boers and Bernstein duo. These guys talk like they know everything, and already after the 2nd pre-season game Boers is back-peddling from his prediction just weeks earlier of the Bears going to the Superbowl. This is after he declared after midway last season that he was off the Cutler bus. So he got off the Cutler bus, but then come this football season, he had them as Superbowl Champs.

If Boers and Bernstein ever needed material for Who Ya Crappin, and they need is to play clips of themselves, because they are the biggest hypocrites and liars there ever were in radio. They are nothing but whores, kowtowing to the liberal agenda at every opportunity. Bernstein can't even say his name correctly, his says his name like Gene Wilder pronounced Frankenstein in Young Frankenstein. Leonard Bernstein is how you pronounce Bernstein. We need to go back to the penguin reference of Bernstein, cause that fits him to a tee. He's the penguin without the nose, as one legendary caller put it.

well at least you made it clear your opinion isn't worth considering.

That ship has sailed and sunk.

I think the Redskins may change their name to the Washington Homosexuals.

Would that bother you?

Go fuck yourself, your mother, your father, and your grandparents (both sides of the family).

For weeks we had to listen to how it was so great that Michael Sam was drafted by St. Louis and that this was a turning moment in sports. Honestly, there was nothing more offensive and vile for TV networks, including ESPN, to have shown Sam kissing another man after he was drafted. As I have argued to Bernstein, what were to happen to the NFL if all the players were homosexual like Sam, to say nothing of the fact that he can't play at the NFL level? There would be no interest whatsoever in watching, except for homosexuals. The league would effectively implode and all advertisers would jump ship guaranteed. Michael Sam is the poster boy for what the NFL should not be.

For weeks we had to listen to how it was so great that Michael Sam was drafted by St. Louis and that this was a turning moment in sports. Honestly, there was nothing more offensive and vile for TV networks, including ESPN, to have shown Sam kissing another man after he was drafted. As I have argued to Bernstein, what were to happen to the NFL if all the players were homosexual like Sam, to say nothing of the fact that he can't play at the NFL level? There would be no interest whatsoever in watching, except for homosexuals. The league would effectively implode and all advertisers would jump ship guaranteed. Michael Sam is the poster boy for what the NFL should not be.

...all the effeminate, capri pants wearing, Philadelphia watching whiners...

Truth hurts doesn't it. You must be Matt Abatacola or as Doug put it recently, a guy who has a name that sounds like a disease.

So if I'm reading this correctly, you're upset that it wasn't you kissing Michael Sam?

I have yet to see one intelligent response to anything I wrote , including your post.

Please tell me this is a bit! If not lose this URL.

Come on.

It's not that bad.

That's another thing you bring up with your sarcasm, this faux controversy over the Redskins. Where was the outrage before? Not when I was watching the NFL in the 70s, 80s and 90s. But when you get a liberal messianic figure in the White House, all the effeminate, capri pants wearing, Philadelphia watching whiners come out of the wood work to complain about the name, that it is somehow offensive. Ditka was right on when he said that the reason the Redskins name came into being in football was out of respect for the brave heritage of American Indians. It was never intended as a slight, and I think most intelligent people realize that. This is just another case of political correctness going to far to stir up a false controversy that doesn't exist.

That's another thing you bring up with your sarcasm, this faux controversy over the Redskins. Where was the outrage before? Not when I was watching the NFL in the 70s, 80s and 90s. But when you get a liberal messianic figure in the White House, all the effeminate, capri pants wearing, Philadelphia watching whiners come out of the wood work to complain about the name, that it is somehow offensive. Ditka was right on when he said that the reason the Redskins name came into being in football was out of respect for the brave heritage of American Indians. It was never intended as a slight, and I think most intelligent people realize that. This is just another case of political correctness going to far to stir up a false controversy that doesn't exist.

I like this guy. He's ok.

the board is at its best when it provides wildly diverging viewpoints

It's like if Jimmy Reardon actually posted about sports.

I agree. There's a great conversation in another thread with two geniuses arguing over whether 767 divided by 8 is 95.8 or 85.2. Check it out!