| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Super Bowl XLIII https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=129&t=28807 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Chus [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Super Bowl XLIII |
5-5 -0.82 units Pittsburgh -6.5 (-113) Arizona/Pitt under 47 (-117) Edgerrin James rushing yards - under 40.5 (+110) Will Larry Fitzgerald score at least one TD yes (-130) First score of the game - field goal or safety (+150) No overtime (-1200) Kurt Warner over 225.5 passing yards (-215) Pittsburgh - punt before they score (-135) Arizona - punt before they score (-175) |
|
| Author: | Bud Dude [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
I already played Pitt also. Got em at -6 -120 Sunday Nite. I think reality sets in for AZ on the 1st. |
|
| Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
I wouldnt take advice from either of your shit records. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Chris_in_joliet wrote: I wouldnt take advice from either of your shit records. Final records for the year: Bud Dude (114-96-2) Chus (177-155-11) yeah, we really suck. |
|
| Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
How is your playoff record along with Bud dudes? Exactly!!! |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Chris_in_joliet wrote: How is your playoff record along with Bad dudes? Exactly!!! Well, if you followed either one of our picks, regular season and playoffs, you would be up, so I don't know what your point is. The only picks that I have seen you make, were in the Hilton contest, and they were terrible. |
|
| Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Yes I was terrible for about 2 weeks in a row, than I got too busy, and I forgot to keep up with it. Other than that I made money all year long. And if I followed your picks for the playoffs and Bad Dudes I would be down big time. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
You and STU should start your own thread, where you guys can talk about the games you picked correctly, even though they weren't posted. Meanwhile, Bud and I will keep posting winners, year in and year out. |
|
| Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Chus wrote: You and STU should start your own thread, where you guys can talk about the games you picked correctly, even though they weren't posted. Meanwhile, Bud and I will keep posting winners, year in and year out. I think I made a few posts with my winnings a few times. I dont know about your record so much, but if someone is really going to tell me that Bud Dude had a winning record than Im going to call them out for lying. I saw his shit and I would say that guy is down more than he wins. How was his playoff record. I know at one time he was about less than 25 percent. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Chris_in_joliet wrote: Chus wrote: You and STU should start your own thread, where you guys can talk about the games you picked correctly, even though they weren't posted. Meanwhile, Bud and I will keep posting winners, year in and year out. I think I made a few posts with my winnings a few times. I dont know about your record so much, but if someone is really going to tell me that Bud Dude had a winning record than Im going to call them out for lying. I saw his shit and I would say that guy is down more than he wins. How was his playoff record. I know at one time he was about less than 25 percent. Here is Bud's record for regular season football, college and pro: Bud Dude (114-96-2) |
|
| Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Chus wrote: Chris_in_joliet wrote: Chus wrote: You and STU should start your own thread, where you guys can talk about the games you picked correctly, even though they weren't posted. Meanwhile, Bud and I will keep posting winners, year in and year out. I think I made a few posts with my winnings a few times. I dont know about your record so much, but if someone is really going to tell me that Bud Dude had a winning record than Im going to call them out for lying. I saw his shit and I would say that guy is down more than he wins. How was his playoff record. I know at one time he was about less than 25 percent. Here is Bud's record for regular season football, college and pro: Bud Dude (114-96-2) Bullshit. Where is that from |
|
| Author: | donspiracy [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Chris_in_joliet wrote: Bullshit. Where is that from Right here buddy. viewtopic.php?f=76&t=28330 Chris, you posted in the Hilton contest most of the season, but never saw the Pick Winners CFB, NFL thread? It has been running for three years. |
|
| Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Got it. I didnt even know he posted in that one. I just saw most of his individual posts when he would say he was playing such and such game and than it seemed more times than not he was losing. My bad for not checking in this thread. Im not gonna post on this one anymore. My bad. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Sat Jan 24, 2009 11:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Edgerrin James rushing yards - under 40.5 (+110) |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Will Larry Fitzgerald score at least one TD yes (-130) |
|
| Author: | Mr. Reason [ Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Better to be thought an idiot than to post and remove all doubt. |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Mr. Reason wrote: Better to be thought an idiot than to post and remove all doubt. nah...i prefer removing all doubt... |
|
| Author: | Coast2Coast [ Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
I like your first three bets Chus. I always struggle with bets calling for one guy to score. I think the "yes" is usually overpriced. I know FItzgerald is the main man, but -130 seems like an overlay for any one guy. Just my 1 cent. Good luck. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Coast2Coast wrote: I like your first three bets Chus. I always struggle with bets calling for one guy to score. I think the "yes" is usually overpriced. I know FItzgerald is the main man, but -130 seems like an overlay for any one guy. Just my 1 cent. Good luck. I always appreciate your insight. Knowing that you like three out of the four makes me like them more. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
First score of the game - field goal or safety +150 |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
No overtime (-1200) Kurt Warner over 225.5 passing yards (-215) |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Pittsburgh punt before they score (-135) Arizona punt before they score (-175) |
|
| Author: | Coast2Coast [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Greetings from Tampa. Before I head over to the game, thought I'd share my tickets for today: Pittsburgh -6.5 1.1 to win 1.0 Arizona +7.5 1.1 to win 1.0 The net effect of these two bets is to risk .1 unit to win 2.0 units if the game lands 7. I'm not going to war with either side, just playing the 20-1 middle shot. under 46.5 2.2 to win 2.0 Pittsburgh total points under 27.5 -1.1 to win 1.0 Arizona total points under 20 -1.1 to win 1.0 I am going to war with the under. Pittsburgh -1/2 Under 52.5 6 pt teaser -1.1 to win 1.0 Prop bets: Edgerrin James total rushing yards UNDER 43.5 -140 -1.4 to win 1.0 |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
i have no idea what any of that means, but good luck... |
|
| Author: | Coast2Coast [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
i don't know if this is going to post or not as the csfmb site is not coming up very well today on my pda hines ward doesn't look right to me as he jogs through pregame warmups. i wouldn't call it a limp because he's probably so shot up with painkillers he doesn't feel much. but it sure doesn't look like is running or cutting anywhere near peak performance. If he isn't running his routes crisply or running at full speed, he's not getting a lot of YAC today. Hines Ward UNDER 66.5 receiving yards -1.1 |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
10-1 on Bruce grabbing Courtney Cox from the crowd just like the video |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Cardinals +7 (I bought the half point) Over 46.5 I've also have 10 prop bets. I bet heavy on the three I posted yesterday: K. Warner Over 245.5 Yards -115 Here is how I look at it: If this game is gonna be close he'll have to be over this number. If it's a blow out, in the 2nd half, he'll do nothing but throw. If Pitt is blowing them out they'll play a soft defense in the 4th leaving Warner to rack up garbage yards to clear the total. K Warner throws 1 interception -210 It's a heavy price to take this but he is gonna throw a pick. A Boldin Over 66.5 Yards -115 I think he's healthy and I think Fitzgerald will see a lot of double teams leaving Boldin free. Fitgerald's total is 95.5. That's a little high to play the over. Although, I wouldn't feel safe playing the under either. That's a no play. Boldin clearing 66.5 is the most likely to me. |
|
| Author: | Mr. Reason [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
chaspoppcap wrote: 10-1 on Bruce grabbing Courtney Cox from the crowd just like the video It's funny. She had no boobs back in '84. And I mean zip, zero, nada. |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
For the record, I'd bang '84 and '09 Courtney Cox. Good call on her dancing with Bruce tonight. I'll bet that does happen. Dancin' in the dark will be played. I'm sure of that. |
|
| Author: | Mr. Reason [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl XLIII |
Beardown wrote: For the record, I'd bang '84 and '09 Courtney Cox. You'd probably bang '84 and '09 Joan Rivers, too. So what's your point? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|