Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

PATS v. GB
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=129&t=90627		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Dignified Rube [ Sat Nov 29, 2014 12:16 pm ]
Post subject:  PATS v. GB
Gotta like the PATS getting +135 straight up. They're going to kick the shit out of GB at Lambeau, IMHO.

Belichik will have an answer for Rogers and Nelson. Coaching favors the Pats over GB and McCarthy. McCathy is always good for one or two dumb calls a game, like an onside kick for no reason.
Author:  Hawg Ass [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Dignified Rube wrote:
Gotta like the PATS getting +135 straight up. They're going to kick the shit out of GB at Lambeau, IMHO.

Belichik will have an answer for Rogers and Nelson. Coaching favors the Pats over GB and McCarthy. McCathy is always good for one or two dumb calls a game, like an onside kick for no reason.

I am sorry for your loss.





:lol:
Author:  Kirkwood [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Has Dignified Rube won a bet at all this year?
Author:  Scorehead [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Stay away from the window. Farrrr away.
Author:  Chus [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Kirkwood wrote:
Has Dignified Rube won a bet at all this year?


The ones that he forgot to post, before the games started.
Author:  Hawg Ass [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Chus wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Has Dignified Rube won a bet at all this year?


The ones that he forgot to post, before the games started.

:lol:
Author:  Dignified Rube [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 5:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Look at all the cheap shots - piling on time.

PATS should have covered. Had them +3 and would have won, if the idiot kicker who had made 13 straight missed the 47 yarder.

If you took GB in the game, you got lucky.
Author:  Kirkwood [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 5:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Dignified Rube wrote:
Look at all the cheap shots - piling on time.

PATS should have covered. Had them +3 and would have won, if the idiot kicker who had made 13 straight missed the 47 yarder.

If you took GB in the game, you got lucky.

What if Davante Adams didn't drop the slant pass where he could've waltzed into the end zone?
Author:  Dignified Rube [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 6:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Kirkwood wrote:
Has Dignified Rube won a bet at all this year?


Who called Buffalo over the Bears?

Ask Big Fan.
Author:  Chus [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 6:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Dignified Rube wrote:
Look at all the cheap shots - piling on time.



Lighten up, Francis.

Asking you to post your picks before they kick, if you are going to strut around, isn't piling on. I'm assuming that you have been to one of the big gambling forums.
Author:  Dignified Rube [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 7:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
I'm happy to let people know what I'm thinking, but not the picks itself, except if I want to do that.

I have no reason to lie about my picks after the games. They are what they are. If I've sucked, I would tell you that too

Yesterday I had Cincy which lost along with my PATS. Never betting on Cincy again. They nearly lost to one of the worst teams in football to Tampa, who cost themselves the game. But I did win yesterday on BUF v. CLE. Didnt play the other games.
Author:  Hawg Ass [ Tue Dec 02, 2014 10:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: PATS v. GB
Dignified Rube wrote:
Look at all the cheap shots - piling on time.

PATS should have covered. Had them +3 and would have won, if the idiot kicker who had made 13 straight missed the 47 yarder.

If you took GB in the game, you got lucky.

If we are playing the what if game, what if the Packers would have taken advantage of any of their 4 trips to red zone?
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/