Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Bears +9 vs. GB? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=129&t=97421 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Dignified Rube [ Tue Nov 24, 2015 5:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Bears +9 vs. GB? |
Surely Vegas can't be serious. Not after the Bears hung with Denver. And they get Forte back this week, probably Alshon too. Taking the money line on the Bears looks very tempting. Like the upset. |
Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Tue Nov 24, 2015 5:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
I think the Bears lose by at least 10. |
Author: | Dignified Rube [ Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
Money line odds about 4-1 for the Bears. Not bad. |
Author: | Darkside [ Tue Nov 24, 2015 6:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
Dignified Rube wrote: Money line odds about 4-1 for the Bears. Not bad. Waste of money. Bears have no chance to win. +9 is a tough call as it is. |
Author: | Peoria Matt [ Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
doug - evergreen park wrote: I think the Bears lose by at least 10. Yea....I'm kind of getting a feeling of a blowout. Lacy/Starks will probably run all over them. This is a game that might put the Packers back on track. |
Author: | Hussra [ Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
Dignified Rube wrote: Surely Vegas can't be serious. Not after the Bears hung with Brock Osweiler And they get Forte back this week, probably Alshon too. Taking the money line on the Bears looks very tempting. Like the upset. also, Green Bay is probably the most public team in the NFC, have been for years now. Vegas always makes Pack fans pay extra/accept worse odds to wager on their team. Probably should be a TD spread,the extra 2 points the Bears are getting/the Pack's giving are cuz Packer fans love to bet on their team. edit: where are you getting +9 at? Bovada has +7. Most places are right around a TD. |
Author: | Chus [ Tue Nov 24, 2015 11:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
Hussra wrote: Green Bay is probably the most public team in the NFC, have been for years now. Vegas always makes Pack fans pay extra/accept worse odds to wager on their team. I would put Dallas on the same plain. |
Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Wed Nov 25, 2015 12:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
Bovada doesn't have a line currently for Bears Packers. How the hell is Carolina only -1 vs. Dallas?!?! |
Author: | Dignified Rube [ Wed Nov 25, 2015 1:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
doug - evergreen park wrote: Bovada doesn't have a line currently for Bears Packers. Because they know the line is a disaster for them. They will wait until an hour before the game to post. footballlocks.com has the +9 line for the Bears. |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Wed Nov 25, 2015 1:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
Jay always plays really well vs the Packers during a primetime game. L O L |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Wed Nov 25, 2015 2:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
It truly is going to be a great evening tomorrow to have all of the quarterbacks that have meant so much to the Packers over the years: Starr Favre Rodgers Cutler |
Author: | Dignified Rube [ Wed Nov 25, 2015 7:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bears +9 vs. GB? |
Hawg Ass wrote: Starr Favre Rodgers Cutler Good one. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |