good dolphin wrote:
I think he'd be great on a station like 890 although he would have to betray his political ideologies. On the other hand, he might be even more popular if he was on that station as the raging liberal.
Bernstein seems to be liberal the way NPR is liberal: "whatever keeps my friends and I busy is good policy" met with support for liberal concepts if not their practices and practitioners, plus, of course, the requisite bohemian-bourgeois cultural elitism. No one who says something as let-them-eat-cake as "try occupying
a job" is a raging liberal. Raging dickhead, you can make an argument for; liberal, not so much.
Incidentally, this is much less a commentary on what may or may not be Bernsie's political leanings than it is a springboard for one on the real editorial biases of so-called "SOCIALIST~! bastion" NPR. I get peals of laughter from the O'HanniRush contingent that thinks sweet old
Morning Edition is the Pravda of the airwaves when their interests
really lie in a vigorous public-private combine that Democrats and Republicans alike seem perfectly amenable to. A news bureau funded by giant corporations, headquartered in Washington, wants big companies to do business with the government? I know, right?
Disclosure: I like Dan Bernstein and NPR way more than genuine leftism

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.